Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 05:58 am (UTC)We aim to please!
Date: 2009-10-16 06:53 am (UTC)Re: We aim to please!
Date: 2009-10-16 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:04 am (UTC)oh but look, Mia and Lian...that makes it better? right?.....
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:56 am (UTC)Also I MUST KNOW THE SOURCE OF YOUR ICON.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:05 am (UTC)The situation is a win, though! COOKIES.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:05 am (UTC)Also I don't think Mia looks like Mia.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 08:07 am (UTC)Or new plots badly handled?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 10:50 am (UTC)The whole thing is just awful.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 12:18 pm (UTC)Can we just *quit* with rapes and sexual violence in comics altogether?
Or at least, can we have a total ban for a few months on, "We can take turns with Supergirl!" or "I've been retconned into being a rapist!" or "I want to fight Power Girl just so I can do her!" and similar?
Can the whole industry just *stop* for a little whole? Yeah, I get it, villains are evil and that bleeds into their sex lives as well. But after a point, it's just tacky.
Note to DC and Marvel -- you passed that point several Crises ago.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 01:39 pm (UTC)But it's so mature. Everyone knows that comics should tackle Deep Adult Issues like killin', rape, rapey killin', and sympathetic characters introduced for the sole purpose of having them raped, killed, and/or eaten, not necessarily in that order.
(Hey, whaddaya know, the Font of Sarcasm works here, too.)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 03:52 pm (UTC)(as wacky as the guy is, that is the reason I'll never not like him)
And it's just so tiring. It's done for shock value, but when it's shoved down your throat for so long, all it does is desensitize people. Which is the antithesis of shocking people into giving you their attention (and money).
I'm enjoying Blackest Night (even with all the gore, which I'm not normally keen on, even though yes, I knew this was a zombie story going in), but honestly? I'm at the point where, once that story wraps up, I'm out. Come and get me when the funny books have *stopped* trying to be cool and hip and adult and mature?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 05:50 am (UTC)Over on Fanficrants every couple of weeks or so we get a rant pointing out that just because someone is a villain it doesn't make him evil about everything, such as sex. Bad guy X might be evil, but that doesn't mean he'll have his way with the hero/heroine at the first convenient opportunity. So its amusing that so-called professionals fall for the dubious idea of making everyone and his brother a rapist just like bad fanfic writers do.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 07:52 am (UTC)Actually? No. You barely look human.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 08:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 01:01 pm (UTC)I've been tuned out of this comic for a while now, and quite frankly I'm astonished that she is still in it. That's just tedious.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 01:57 pm (UTC)Boo, I wanted to support a Canary title
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 02:01 pm (UTC)Maybe there's a new creative team lined up...but on the other hand, if there isn't...outlook not so good.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 03:53 pm (UTC)Then again, fire probably doesn't even want it.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 09:06 pm (UTC)But really, that would be awesome. So. Much. Awesome.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-17 03:30 am (UTC)Or maybe "unmeasurable"?
. . .
bad place!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 06:13 pm (UTC)Which is SAYING SOMETHING.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-16 09:30 pm (UTC)