Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 06:16 pm (UTC)Bad writing: Batman throwing down a smoke bomb and having one of the gangsters explain it. This isn't the Silver Age anymore, folks. Not everything needs to be explains with text.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 06:18 pm (UTC)But the rest of the story? Jumbled and very rough. And I was very surprised to see this addition.
As well, when was the last time we actually saw Selina steal jewels? Just seems to be very random.
Daniel should really stick with the art. PLEASE, DC?!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 07:35 pm (UTC)Perhaps because he has a good track record of being on time with his work, had expressed an interest in writing, is intimately familiar with the Batclan. Plus perhaps a deliberate effort to have a NEW writer's take on Batman since it IS a new Batman.
A risky strategy, but I'll see how it goes.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 07:50 pm (UTC)Yes, but the kind of people you mention usually gets mini-series or 2-3 issue arcs not event books like BftC.
Anyway, I choose to believe in more ridiculous theories even if it is for the laughs.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:43 pm (UTC)(I'm still very ticked off at him for what he did to Jason)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:04 pm (UTC)Basically, Batman will sell if written by a pair of chimps. Better put the good writers to work on more obscure titles where people might be tempted to go there for the writer's sake.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:01 pm (UTC)But, agreed, why would DC put someone inexperienced at writing on one of their biggest books?
Sometimes I just think it's b/c DC hates us. Yep. That's it.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:20 pm (UTC)And they express their hate by bringing in a newer writer who's a bit mediocre but steadily improving? No, if they really hate us they would have given the writing gig to Chuck Austin and had art by Rob Liefeld.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 07:21 pm (UTC)So naturally, since "inspiring" superhero comics rely entirely on no one being able to reform ever, he's back now. And this is like what? 15 years later?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:07 pm (UTC)As for Daniel, I think he got a lot of brownie points because of Battle for the Cowl from Didio. Remember Geoff Johns got thrust into DC's big-wigs eyes (away from the Star and S.T.R.I.P.E series he created) because he was almost the only writer they could find who was willing to do "Day of Judgement" according to Geoff himself (this is the story in which Hal becomes Spectre). Geoff was basically handed the plotline (just as Daniel was with BfTC) and told to work from there. Years later, Johns had enough power bring Hal back as GL, ret-con Emerald Twilight and make Green Lantern one of DC's highest-selling books with Hal as the lead (something readers were told couldn't be done during the Emerald Twilight period).
DC has a bunch of go-to writers who are willing to do basically dialogue for whatever Editorial piece Didio has already mapped out (think Will Pfeiffer with Amazons Attack, Adam Beechan with the Batgirl fiasco and Countdown, Gray and Palmiotti also with Countdown, Sean McKeever with the slutty Ms. Martian and Wonder Twins mauled Teen Titans era and, again, also with Countdown). And then in return these guys will usually get rewarded with some leeway of their own (for instance, Gray and Palmiotti's PowerGirl book might as well exist in its own universe).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:11 pm (UTC)Where did he say this?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-03 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:04 pm (UTC)Sniff, sniff. We need to talk, Hef. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-02 10:54 pm (UTC)Granted, Winick can be hit or miss, but I thought his Jason was great. I like the idea as well that while he took the Red Hood mask and re-invented it, he was against the idea of playing "dress up" -- another thumbing of the nose to his father figure.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-03 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-03 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-03 07:00 pm (UTC)