JLA/Planetary & a question
Dec. 27th, 2009 05:42 pmHi everyone
This is my first post to the community - other than the occasional comment on v1.0 and v2.0. I am curious to know whether you might have any good ideas as to what I ought to do with a couple of long boxes worth of old comics.

Some of my comics date back to the early 80s, but most are more recent ones - with a DC bias. Most of them I also now have in TPB format.
To be honest, some of them probably have some value (eg some variants and sought after runs) - and some I will keep for sentimental reasons (incl. the lack of TPB availability - eg Linda Danvers Supergirl) - but I am currently cash rich time-poor (and storage-poor!) and just want rid of them.
Now, the kicker is that I am based in Scotland, so comics are even less popular here than in North America. I was thinking of just freecycling them on a box-by-box basis, but if I can think of anything more sensible to do with them - that I can do relatively quickly and painlessly - that would be great.
Bonus - a couple of Planetary scans. I have an ambivalent feeling towards the end of this story. It seems to me to imply that Bruce & Diana will be just as maniacal in this reality as the Planetary team were.
This is my first post to the community - other than the occasional comment on v1.0 and v2.0. I am curious to know whether you might have any good ideas as to what I ought to do with a couple of long boxes worth of old comics.

Some of my comics date back to the early 80s, but most are more recent ones - with a DC bias. Most of them I also now have in TPB format.
To be honest, some of them probably have some value (eg some variants and sought after runs) - and some I will keep for sentimental reasons (incl. the lack of TPB availability - eg Linda Danvers Supergirl) - but I am currently cash rich time-poor (and storage-poor!) and just want rid of them.
Now, the kicker is that I am based in Scotland, so comics are even less popular here than in North America. I was thinking of just freecycling them on a box-by-box basis, but if I can think of anything more sensible to do with them - that I can do relatively quickly and painlessly - that would be great.
Bonus - a couple of Planetary scans. I have an ambivalent feeling towards the end of this story. It seems to me to imply that Bruce & Diana will be just as maniacal in this reality as the Planetary team were.
I am really really hoping I have not screwed anything up in this post. I checked and rechecked the code and the rules. Please be gentle with me if I have made a boo-boo.
PS - in case tags are still switched off: char: elijah snow, char: wonder woman/diana of themyscira, char: batman/bruce wayne, creator: jerry ordway, creator: warren ellis



no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 06:11 pm (UTC)Babies, babies, babies, babies,
no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 01:49 am (UTC)Admittly it was the DCAU that gave me the Bats/WW idea.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 12:05 am (UTC)Icon adds a double punch.
Date: 2009-12-28 12:31 am (UTC)Re: Icon adds a double punch.
Date: 2009-12-28 02:18 am (UTC)Re: Icon adds a double punch.
Date: 2009-12-28 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 06:43 pm (UTC)(there is one; atleast I think one was visualized during Bruce's " THESE FOUR " bit)
Drummer
Date: 2009-12-27 08:36 pm (UTC)Not sure how much of a threat Drums would pose without more people like Elijah to keep him focused though.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 01:33 am (UTC)Only people with more 'complex' tax affairs have to do an annual self assessment and file this with HMRC For example, those that are self employed would have to do a self assessment as a matter of course, and if you have various different income streams you might find it a good idea.
We don't really have the same concept of a lot of ordinary expenditure being tax-deductible in the UK, unless it is spend in the course of running a business - so, mortgage interest, sales taxes, and lots of other things I seem to remember that you can get deductions for in the US/Canada, are just taxed here, and that is that!
Charity donations can be made gross of tax, but the way it works for us is that the charity claims the tax element of your donation on your behalf as long as you have confirmed to them you are a UK taxpayer. So, for example, if I am a basic rate taxpayer (20%) and I donate £80 to a charity, they will actually receive £100 as they will get £80 directly from me and £20 from the government. The obvious flaw is in regards to non-monetary donations - such as goods that you give to a charity shop - no tax deduction available.
So, the short version is, on the whole we probably pay more tax than you, but we don't have to fill out those horrible forms every year, and worry as much about potentially being audited. After filling in tax returns for both Canada and Australia in the last 10 years, I think on the whole I prefer the UK system.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 01:44 am (UTC)Anyway, I'm glad I live in a State without a state income tax, because you're right: the forms are ridiculous. Even more ridiculous is that the IRS here actually calculates exactly what you owe, they just don't *tell* you what their figure is. (i.e. the government knows what you owe, but they won't give an option to just pay that without doing your own assessment.) It's kind of goofy.
My state taxes are just property and sales, and sales tax is still pretty low around here (8.5% in my city, 7.5% base IIRC.)
no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 12:50 pm (UTC)Thanks
Date: 2009-12-27 08:32 pm (UTC)However, I am of the opinion that a lot of this isn't really the kind of stuff I would be keen to see 5-7 year olds reading (pyscho pirate eye gouging anyone?).
I haven't lived in this area long enough to know any local schools/shelters etc. I'll maybe ask at the local Oxfam Books store to see if they would take them - or have good alternative ideas.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 09:21 pm (UTC)My suggestion is to separate them by age range and give them to a local hospital.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 11:44 pm (UTC)The idea of people taking scissors to these once-prized possessions makes me feel a bit sick.
On the other hand, I just don't have the time or inclination to put the effort in to sell them. If only I had been so keen to get rid of them back when I was a student and had time to mess about on ebay.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-29 03:07 am (UTC)Still have 5 longboxes I'm slowly selling off.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-27 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 07:09 am (UTC)I do think Ordway's art here has something to do with it. Again, I don't understand that either as I usually like him.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-28 10:00 pm (UTC)