Well, my last post seems to be well-received as a novelty post of sorts, so now seems like the perfect time to follow it up two more pieces of fluff-interest.
First up is a 1974 Electric Company tie-in, showing Spider-man teaming up with... The Reader? But what villainy could possibly necessitate these two forces for good coming together in a tale like no other?

Like yesterday's, this too comes by way of The Retroist, whose old comic scans I promise to stop grabbing so much after this. Speaking of which, I rather like his analysis:
The main reason I'm posting, however, is this next scan. But since I wasn't sure if it was sufficient on its own, I opted to piggyback it on the above, since they come from the same source. I guess you can sort of call this an endorsement of the site:

I always wondered what Jim Shooter looked like, but never actually cared enough to look. I was content to just think of him as a mysterious man behind the curtain. I never imagined that he was one of the Beatles.
--LBD "Nytetrayn"
First up is a 1974 Electric Company tie-in, showing Spider-man teaming up with... The Reader? But what villainy could possibly necessitate these two forces for good coming together in a tale like no other?

Like yesterday's, this too comes by way of The Retroist, whose old comic scans I promise to stop grabbing so much after this. Speaking of which, I rather like his analysis:
The Reader seems to have the ability to force people to prance, almost mince, merrily down the street reading whatever they lay their eyes on.
Lucky for Spidey he had passed this way, because a motorcycle driving scofflaw, who cannot read, happens by at the same time and runs the very Stop sign that the Reader was pointing out. Spider-man, who has no other crimes to fight in early 1970s New York, shoots a web at guy, pulls him from his seat and shatters his spine. It might seem like an inappropriate response, but I’ll have you know that guy enrolled in an adult learning classes at the hospital. 8 months later, when he got out, he could read! He couldn’t walk anymore, but 6 of one. Out of sight!
All in a days work for the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man.
The main reason I'm posting, however, is this next scan. But since I wasn't sure if it was sufficient on its own, I opted to piggyback it on the above, since they come from the same source. I guess you can sort of call this an endorsement of the site:

I always wondered what Jim Shooter looked like, but never actually cared enough to look. I was content to just think of him as a mysterious man behind the curtain. I never imagined that he was one of the Beatles.
--LBD "Nytetrayn"

no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:43 am (UTC)... Okay, so he's standing on a cinder block, but still ...
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 03:51 pm (UTC)Rise and. Shine.
He also kinda looksk like Antonio Banderas.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 04:13 am (UTC)And when is he going to be a superhero? He's only been a sidekick and a supplier!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:37 am (UTC)Mark Bagley was one of two pencillers chosen from the Marvel Try-Out Contest.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 11:18 am (UTC)He's Morgan Freeman, of course he does...
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 11:51 am (UTC)Jim Shooter in the year 2008:
This is when he was younger.
This is from Wiki:
"While Marvel editor-in-chief in 1982, Shooter detailed what he considered the necessary qualities for a good comic book story:
* The characters must be introduced.
* Their situation must be established.
* The conflict must be introduced.
* Suspense must be built.
* A climax must be reached.
* A resolution must be achieved.
. . . When I evaluate a story, should one of the essential elements listed above be missing — say, the characters are not introduced properly when they are brought onstage — I immediately suspect that the author of the "story" knoweth not what he ith [sic] doing.
Second, I look for how well the story is told. Is the conflict worthwhile? Is the climax exciting? Is the resolution satisfying? Is the plot good? Are there interesting twists and turns? Is there a theme? Is there character development? Is it dramatic? Is it entertaining? This is the really important stuff. It should go without saying that a writer or a prospective writer should know enough to meet the fundamental requirements of a story. It's the power and the passion and drama and characterization that I really look for.[32]"
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 12:10 pm (UTC)Ever see the piece Charles Burns did in RAW using pages from that as his layout?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 12:24 pm (UTC)Writer-- Chuck Duffie
Penciller-- Mark Bagley
Inker-- Doug Hazlewood
Colorist-- P. Jeanine Pasda
Letterer-- Robin Riggs
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 04:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 03:16 am (UTC)