going undercover
Jan. 3rd, 2010 03:49 pmThanks to Comics Alliance, I found the blog Covered. It does with comics covers what musicians do with other people's song songs - redo them with their own interpretation.
Some of these new covers are very good. Some of them bring in completely new style, some are just different techniques, some rework the cover completely, using a different image to tell the same story. Some look like the artist thought to themselves "What would this cover look like if it was drawn on a train?" and some are just very straightforward re-hashes with little imagination.
With all of these, the original cover is on the left.
Fantastic Four 4
Original cover by Mike Sekowsky and Murphy Anderson; DC 1966, cover by Bill Galvan (who you will of course recognise from one of the Age of the Sentry stories)

Justice League of America 45
Original cover by Mike Sekowsky and Murphy Anderson; DC 1966. Cover by Mark Grambau

Avengers 217
Original cover by Bob Hall and Dan Green; Marvel 1982. Cover by Matt Layzell

This is clearly, The Best cover
Captain America 137
Original cover by Sal Buscema; Marvel 1971. Cover by Mark Grambau

Much less dynamic than the original
Some of these new covers are very good. Some of them bring in completely new style, some are just different techniques, some rework the cover completely, using a different image to tell the same story. Some look like the artist thought to themselves "What would this cover look like if it was drawn on a train?" and some are just very straightforward re-hashes with little imagination.
With all of these, the original cover is on the left.
Fantastic Four 4
Original cover by Mike Sekowsky and Murphy Anderson; DC 1966, cover by Bill Galvan (who you will of course recognise from one of the Age of the Sentry stories)
Justice League of America 45
Original cover by Mike Sekowsky and Murphy Anderson; DC 1966. Cover by Mark Grambau
Avengers 217
Original cover by Bob Hall and Dan Green; Marvel 1982. Cover by Matt Layzell
This is clearly, The Best cover
Captain America 137
Original cover by Sal Buscema; Marvel 1971. Cover by Mark Grambau
Much less dynamic than the original

no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 12:10 am (UTC)Some of them make it look like the reimagining that the artist is aiming for is "What if this was shit?"
The Donald Duck ones are gems though, and I think that we can all agree that the Avengers cover is great.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 05:19 pm (UTC)The Avengers cover looks very intimidating.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:13 pm (UTC)I smell a love triangle! :D
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:02 pm (UTC)The only negative aspect is marketing, I guess, since the title is hard to read.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 12:13 am (UTC)Now, look in the bottom left corner. There's still a Spider-man, but he's been incorporated organically into the cover, instead of just being a logo slapped on to it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 12:22 am (UTC)Isn't that it?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:49 pm (UTC)On topic, I really like the Captain America and Falcon redesign - less for the image (which is nicely done) as the titles and sidebar. The Avengers one is quite nice, too.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 10:23 pm (UTC)I'm curious, why were Cap and the Falcon going to fight Spidey?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 10:23 pm (UTC)That was one that stood out to me as being a good re-doing.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 02:25 am (UTC)