Re: AU Gwen

Date: 2010-01-18 01:13 am (UTC)
Anyone could retcon it. They looked exactly like Gwen and Peter, which means they had no genetic input from Norman Osborn, the supposed father, and there is genetic input from Peter, who never had sex with Gwen. Either someone was really sloppy in planning the story and forgot about the resemblance when they decided that Peter wouldn't be the father, or they were putting down the groundwork for a future story where it would be revealed that they were actually clones that Osborn created to mess with Peter.
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of scans_daily.
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

July 2014

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags