... some pages from Blackest Night Wondy #3 that don't make me want to vomit.
Cool moment as Diana muses over the feel of wearing a ring:

The idea of Diana seeing Ares as Rage!Guy's patron, and being completely sanguine about that (pun intended, sorry), really tickles me.
Also, best reaction ever to getting blood barfed on one's face:

And my favorite, a two-page spread, with dialog so good it almost starts to make up for having to see that abhorrent costume:

And then she neatly cocoons him, shatters him and moves on, and that's all there is to it. I think it's a seriously wasted opportunity that we didn't see any of Diana's dead in this mini - Myndi would have been awesome - but I like how Max only mattered in the first one and is really just an afterthought in this ish.
... not that I can say I care for what he's an afterthought to, but again. Won't get into it. Fightin' off that red ring.
Oh, and as per
ravenous_raven's suggestions here, a modified Wondersapphire uniform:

Feel free to mentally insert in the scene above to assist your sanity.
Cool moment as Diana muses over the feel of wearing a ring:

The idea of Diana seeing Ares as Rage!Guy's patron, and being completely sanguine about that (pun intended, sorry), really tickles me.
Also, best reaction ever to getting blood barfed on one's face:

And my favorite, a two-page spread, with dialog so good it almost starts to make up for having to see that abhorrent costume:

And then she neatly cocoons him, shatters him and moves on, and that's all there is to it. I think it's a seriously wasted opportunity that we didn't see any of Diana's dead in this mini - Myndi would have been awesome - but I like how Max only mattered in the first one and is really just an afterthought in this ish.
... not that I can say I care for what he's an afterthought to, but again. Won't get into it. Fightin' off that red ring.
Oh, and as per

Feel free to mentally insert in the scene above to assist your sanity.

no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 05:19 am (UTC)I said it was a testament to Nicola Scott's work that I'm not cringing as much as I should. I never said that fixes it or meant to imply that it downplays the problem.
That was just my reaction to it. I admire Scott's pencilling skills, is all I'm saying, really. I have actually been wondering lately about how much control someone in Scott's position might have over this sort of thing.
I fully realize what a crappy thing this Star Sapphire business is with Wonder Woman. Not just the costume, but the entire idea of her being a Star Sapphire when she would've been much better suited to something like Indigo (compassion). And then there's the fact that there seem to be no male Star Sapphires, which is another ridiculous aspect to this whole thing.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 05:31 am (UTC)Of course WW would have been much better suited to Indigo. It's in her history, it's in the issues off BN:WW where they made her all about loving everybody, but actually getting all turned by sexually loving Batman. It's right there. The sexism is extreme in this. Extreme.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 07:10 am (UTC)I like Nicola Scott's pencils. I also think the WW Star Sapphire costume is ridiculous and sexist. The two opinions are not mutually exclusive, and having the former one does not negate the latter.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 07:26 am (UTC)Because I think her position does play a part. Just as any writer or artist plays a part. She drew this. But she is a good artist.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 07:39 am (UTC)(At any rate, in the post I linked to, part of what I'm wondering is how much real-world sexism might prevent a feminist writer or artist or editor from questioning or altering something they think is sexist within the comics they're making. I don't know for sure whether Nicola Scott considers herself a feminist, but I think it's important to consider that there may be other factors had hand than just "this comic artist draw a sexist costume", you know? The costume doesn't come down to just one person's decisions in this sort of thing.)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 08:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 08:45 am (UTC)That is not what I mean at all. Perhaps I'm not being particularly articulate tonight, but if you read the post that I linked to, there is more context for what I'm asking.
What I'm wondering is that if sexist factors in the industry might prevent feminists (women or men) involved in making a comic from saying to DC, "hey, how about we don't give her a skimpy costume?" or "wouldn't Wonder Woman be more suited to compassion?" or "how about we have a guy become a Star Sapphire instead?".
There's research that suggests that women tend to not get ahead in the workplace as much if they speak up or negotiate about things–they're seen as difficult and less preferable to work with, where as that behaviour in men is more likely to be rewarded and viewed positively. Essentially, I'm wondering how that sort of thing plays out in the comics industry specifically.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 05:04 pm (UTC)I guess I'm just not getting why Helena's belly-suit is an affront to everyone, but this, and Wonder Woman's extreme marginalization, is more acceptable.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 06:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-04 03:14 pm (UTC)Though the off chance always exists that it was Scott's brainchild from the start - outside our little S_D haven, the "what the fuck" attitude toward the thing is a distinctly minority opinion, even among female fans AFAICT, and Amanda Conner is the one who turned Peej's window into a windshield, after all... You never do know who you can trust.
As Rucka has just thoroughly proved for us. ;_;