scans_daily: Eddie scenes in Gotham City Sirens 9

benicio127 (

benicio127) wrote in

scans_daily,
@ 2010-02-27 02:51 pm UTC

Entry tags:

char: batman/dick grayson, char: catwoman/selina kyle, char: harley quinn/harleen quinzel, char: poison ivy/pamela isley, char: wildcat/ted grant, creator: guillem march, creator: paul dini, creator: tony daniel, publisher: dc comics, title: batman, title: gotham city sirens

Eddie scenes in Gotham City Sirens 9

Ted Grant, personal trainer to sexy vigilante women!

I just had to add this. My only wish is that Wildcat would have walked away saying .... "Darn whippersnappers...!" XDDD

I love the way Dini writes Eddie's inner monologue here. Eddie, you sneaky, narcissistic bastard.

I read this and I was like... That was good. I'm liking this Eddie --- OH SNAP.

From Tony Daniel's blog http://tonydaniel.blogspot.com/

Preview for Batman 699....

Eddie! Oh Eddie! What happened to your lips! And that's Dick, posing on a pile of garbage or something....

Tags: Char: Catwoman/Selina Kyle, char: wildcat/ted grant, char: poison ivy/pamela isley, char: harley quinn/harleen quinzel, title: Batman, title: Gotham City Sirens, creator: Guillem March, creator: Paul Dini, creator: Tony Daniel, char: Batman/Dick Grayson

(Read 35 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

	no subject ravenous_raven 2010-03-01 12:58 am UTC (link)
	Never trust the covers, period, for exactly that reason. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 5 comments) (Show 5 comments)

	no subject psychopathicus_rex 2010-03-01 03:30 am UTC (link)
	Precisely. It's VERY rare to find a cover that portrays exactly what's going on - if it did, what would be the point of buying the comic? That's what the covers are for - to give you a tantalizing taste of what may or may not be the real thing. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 4 comments) (Show 4 comments)

	no subject ravenous_raven 2010-03-01 06:39 pm UTC (link)
	It's like covers are their own, random AU...-_-' (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

no subject

psychopathicus_rex
2010-03-01 11:13 pm UTC (link)

Well, you COULD come up with a very different version of the DCU if you went solely by the covers. In the cover version, for example, the villains always win, Superman has died and come back to life about a million times, and the JLA goes through bizarre transformations at the drop of a hat. (Of course, this is going by today's covers - if you went by the covers of, say, the Golden or Silver Age, you'd get a far different - and substantially more bizarre - version.)

(Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

no subject

neuhallidae
2010-03-01 10:21 pm UTC (link)

Wasn't it already confirmed in interviews that he was going back to straight up villainy, though? Or maybe I'm confusing him with someone else. Turning reformed villains back into baby-eating psychos (even when they weren't baby-eating psychos while they were villains) seems to be a popular thing with both of the big two lately.

(Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

no subject

psychopathicus_rex
2010-03-01 11:19 pm UTC (link)

Well, yes, it may have been, but even at his absolute looniest, Eddie has never approached the level of Joker-esque insanity that seems to be portrayed on that cover. His shtick has always been 'riddle me this - I'm FINALLY gonna outwit Batman!' rather than 'Nyahahaha, you all shall DIEEEEEEEE!' I mean, yes, as you say, making villains uncharacteristically psychotic HAS been a bit of a trend lately, but still, I doubt it would make much sense to do that to Eddie. We'll have to wait and see.

(Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

(Read 35 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

Account name:	Log in with OpenID?
Password:	Forget your password?
	Remember me