scans_daily: ...wait, WHAT?

queenanthai (

queenanthai) wrote in

scans_daily,
@ 2010-04-15 08:31 pm UTC

Entry tags:

char: mary jane watson, char: spider-man/peter parker, creator: david michelinie, creator: todd mcfarlane, publisher: marvel comics, title: amazing spider-man

...wait, WHAT?

Ummm...good thing there wasn't Google in 1988?

(39 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

	no subject punishermax 2010-04-16 01:58 am UTC (link)
	And then MJ fucked him with a strap on. ZIS EES ZE END Wow I just noticed the wiki entry. Jesus, that's a pretty blue reference for a mainstream comic. (Reply to this)

	no subject falseaesop 2010-04-16 02:01 am UTC (link)
	Wonder if she's going to keep those fishnets on for this. (Reply to this)

	no subject jlroberson 2010-04-16 02:04 am UTC (link)
	Ah, the meme from LA LAW. (and that I had to imagine Jill Eikenberry and Michael Tucker having sex is something I'll never forgive) I remember such a huge amount of speculation as to what exactly it was at the time. At the time it was made up. Now it's not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_butterfly (Reply to this)

	no subject zordboy 2010-04-16 02:33 am UTC (link)
	Wow. For a mainstream comic, that's a pretty racy thing to say. I... really can't look at Peter and MJ in the same way I used to, to be honest <_<. I mean, wow. Holy crap. (Reply to this) (Thread) (Hide 4 comments) (Show 4 comments)

	no subject aaron_bourque 2010-04-16 02:44 am UTC (link)
	Really? Because I always imagined they had a pretty healthy sex life. But I've been called weird. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 3 comments) (Show 3 comments)

	no subject zordboy 2010-04-16 03:02 am UTC (link)
	Well, yeah, but this isn't imagined so much as waaaaay too much information. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 2 comments) (Show 2 comments)

	no subject punishermax 2010-04-16 03:07 am UTC (link)
	Yeah same. It's way DeviantArt stuff about Spider-Man and other marvel characters kinda skeevs me (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject zordboy 2010-04-16 03:14 am UTC (link)
	Yeah, like, it's fine they're a married couple who love each other, they should have a healthy sex life. But I don't need to know explicitly what they're doing to each other in their alone time. I have porn for that, dang it. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject scenesaroundjackson.wordpress.com 2010-04-16 02:41 am UTC (link)
	heh, i actually own this issue awesome (Reply to this)

	no subject daningram.insanejournal.com 2010-04-16 02:50 am UTC (link)
	Man, the things you overlook as a kid. It reminds me oif the Indiania Jones movie, when they're talking about the female nazi. Indy asks his Dad how he knew. "She talks in her sleep." As a kid, I thought that meant he overheard her from his room or somethin'. Now that I'm older... (Reply to this) (Thread) (Hide 13 comments) (Show 13 comments)

	no subject bluefall 2010-04-16 02:56 am UTC (link)
	Haha, me too. I remember spending half an hour trying to figure out what Connery had meant by that, like... what could she possibly have said in her sleep that he would have heard either through the wall or in the five seconds when he walked past her door at night to go to the bathroom or whatever that would have clued him in? (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject zordboy 2010-04-16 03:03 am UTC (link)
	"Man, the things you overlook as a kid." This is so true. There's so much you just don't think twice about as a kid, but is a lot less innocent later on. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject freezer 2010-04-17 12:54 am UTC (link)
	Hell, I was in my mid-20s before I realized Rick James' "Mary Jane" wasn't about a woman and Kool & The Gang's "Tonight" was about the singer getting his V-Card punched. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	Totally over my head! 01d55 2010-04-16 03:31 am UTC (link)
	From Who Framed Roger Rabbit?: "Nice booby trap." (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 2 comments) (Show 2 comments)

	no subject neuhallidae 2010-04-16 05:15 am UTC (link)
	Or "Hey, that don't rhyme with walls!" "No, but this does!" ::crotch kick:: (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject kirke_novak 2010-04-16 11:56 am UTC (link)
	Since we are sharing - I used to wonder a lot why would Zephyr and Apollo fight for Hyacinth. Couldn't he be friends with both of them? And what the hell Zeus needed Ganymede for? I blame the way I turned out for the countless hours I'd spent wondering about this. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject ninjapeps 2010-04-16 04:37 am UTC (link)
	the things you learn when you get older. I used to be so confused about the song "I Touch Myself" way back when. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 4 comments) (Show 4 comments)

	no subject sir_razorback 2010-04-16 06:17 am UTC (link)
	That one and Turning Japanese. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 3 comments) (Show 3 comments)

	no subject ninjapeps 2010-04-16 06:24 am UTC (link)
	that just made me realize that I don't know any of its lyrics outside of "I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so" so I looked them up and wtf. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject wizardru 2010-04-16 12:03 pm UTC (link)
	That whole concept was applied retroactively after the fact. The band has stated multiple times that it wasn't about masturbation, but just being an outsider. People invented a different meaning and an urban legend/meme was born in the times since. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject halloweenjack 2010-04-16 04:33 pm UTC (link)
	Or "She-Bop", or "Darling Nikki." The 80s: All about the masturbation songs. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject kamino_neko 2010-04-16 03:29 pm UTC (link)
	... I am left with the inescapable conclusion that I was an unusual kid. As I've never had a problem properly grasping at least the generalities of that sort of thing, at least as far back as I can remember. The specifics, certainly, but the general concept, I got. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject kingrockwell 2010-04-16 10:46 pm UTC (link)
	I don't even know what I thought was going on in City Slickers when I first saw it as a kid, but it sure wasn't the whole story! (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject seriousfic 2010-04-16 03:41 am UTC (link)
	PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN. (Reply to this)

	no subject psychopathicus_rex 2010-04-16 04:25 am UTC (link)
	I'm guessing that this particular issue is not going to be reprinted anytime soon. (Reply to this)

	no subject tanetris 2010-04-16 04:26 am UTC (link)
	If loving 80s-hair MJ (using at-the-time-ill-defined sexual techniques) is wrong, I don't wanna be right. (Reply to this)

	no subject skalja 2010-04-16 11:26 am UTC (link)
	I cannot believe you posted this and not the earlier parts of the issue with Peter dressed in nothing more than underwear, a bow tie, and a really bad French accent. (Reply to this) (Thread) (Hide 8 comments) (Show 8 comments)

	no subject grazzt 2010-04-16 01:10 pm UTC (link)
	Seconded. That was the most awesome part. Or has that already been posted to the new community? (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject skalja 2010-04-16 03:10 pm UTC (link)
	To the best of my knowledge, no. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	By popular demand queenanthai 2010-04-16 06:18 pm UTC (link)
	Ha, okay, okay! (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Hide 5 comments) (Show 5 comments)

	Re: By popular demand kingrockwell 2010-04-16 10:44 pm UTC (link)
	See, if That Parker Luck worked out like this more often, I could still be a Spider-Fan! (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	Re: By popular demand skalja 2010-04-17 12:52 am UTC (link)
	wild cheering (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	Re: By popular demand zordboy 2010-04-17 04:44 am UTC (link)
	Should've been something skimpier. ... What? (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	Re: By popular demand person4 2010-04-17 12:44 pm UTC (link)
	Oh, Pete, Chicken McNuggests aren't the right choice for a romantic dinner no matter how much she likes them. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	Re: By popular demand greenmask 2010-04-17 07:27 pm UTC (link)
	Cutest evs! (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject une_croix 2010-04-16 02:57 pm UTC (link)
	This is Todd McFarlane, right? (Reply to this) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject kingrockwell 2010-04-16 10:43 pm UTC (link)
	Yes. (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

	no subject sandoz_iscariot 2010-04-16 06:18 pm UTC (link)
	This is why Peter/MJ is my OTP. (Reply to this) (Thread) (Hide 1 comment) (Show 1 comment)

	no subject aaron_bourque 2010-04-17 04:46 pm UTC (link)
	NO PETER SHOULD NEVER HAVE ONE TRUE PAIRING HE SHOULD BE A SWINGING BACHELOR AND HAVE LOTS OF GIRLFRIENDS BECAUSE THAT REFLECTS HOW YOUNG PEOPLE ARE TODAY, BECAUSE NONE OF THEM ARE LOOKING FOR THAT ONE RELATIONSHIP THAT WILL LAST A LIFETIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! (Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent)

(39 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)