Wonder Woman #43 Preview
Apr. 26th, 2010 02:01 pmSource.
PG's boob window? It's empowering or a symbol placeholder or something.
Helena's bare abs? She worked out a lot.
Wonder Woman's whole ensemble?


It has been explained before with the Diana Trevor story, though I guess a tip of the hat to a woman who gave her life to aid them wasn't good enough. Really drilling that in with Hippolyta wearing the flag in the scene right before this yet dropping the connection in favor of some coincidental weather and a few stars that might be Cassiopeia.
For a moment there I almost thought this was closer to the present day, ignoring the sudden break in the story, and they might actually be trashing the swim suit in favor of something less ridiculous.
Silly, optimism. Sensible clothing is for kids* (and men).
*If you know of something that contradicts this, please don't tell me. I don't want to know.
PG's boob window? It's empowering or a symbol placeholder or something.
Helena's bare abs? She worked out a lot.
Wonder Woman's whole ensemble?


It has been explained before with the Diana Trevor story, though I guess a tip of the hat to a woman who gave her life to aid them wasn't good enough. Really drilling that in with Hippolyta wearing the flag in the scene right before this yet dropping the connection in favor of some coincidental weather and a few stars that might be Cassiopeia.
For a moment there I almost thought this was closer to the present day, ignoring the sudden break in the story, and they might actually be trashing the swim suit in favor of something less ridiculous.
Silly, optimism. Sensible clothing is for kids* (and men).
*If you know of something that contradicts this, please don't tell me. I don't want to know.

no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:11 pm (UTC)*If you know of something that contradicts this, please don't tell me. I don't want to know."
Sorry, but this is just too obvious:
Dick Grayson as Robin.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:39 pm (UTC)Also also, I was trying to be good, but that line is just too facile to let it go: if a woman who looks like she "wants" to fight surely will, is it not also true that a woman who looks like she wants to sell her body surely will as well? I mean, if we're using modern Western standards and all.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) Thread Freeze!
From:(frozen) Re: Thread Freeze!
From:Re: Thread Freeze!
From:Re: Thread Freeze!
From:Re: Thread Freeze!
From:Re: Thread Freeze!
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:39 pm (UTC)Wait.
What?
So that's where the colors come from, but why a bikini?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:43 pm (UTC)Of course, there's the minor problem that the letter W was invented in England after the Norman Conquest...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:57 pm (UTC)*squee*
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:00 pm (UTC)Or, god forbid, DC just finally settles on making her a new costume and making fans just deal with it.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 10:59 pm (UTC)I think the readers who do care about this stuff deserve an explanation that
makes some sense.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:03 pm (UTC)I need an 'awful pun' icon.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 08:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:Re: Isn't she....?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:27 pm (UTC)And I guess this is Simone's way of defending the bathing suit. It's still a bathing suit, though. And looking at the thing Pallas designed there and what the others are wearing makes it even harder to believe the bathing suit could've come out of Themyscira.
The suit might make more sense if we pretend Hippolyta left Themyscira for WW2 and assume she based it on the heroes she met then? I mean, so long as we're retconning stuff.
(I have been pretending this for like a year.)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 07:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Project Runway: Superhero Edition
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Yeah, no.
Date: 2010-04-26 07:54 pm (UTC)Besides that, though, this is some very good writing. I especially like Diana's last line; "I am politely and diplomatically informing you that I am about to kick your ass."
Re: Yeah, no.
Date: 2010-04-26 10:38 pm (UTC)Their costumes make no more sense than Diana's.
Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:Re: Yeah, no.
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:08 pm (UTC)I don't know why that's the plot hole that most jumps out at me, but there you go.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:13 pm (UTC)that has never been explained before at all, really.
People can still follow the Diana Trevor origin of the costume if they like, Hippolyta is clearly
holding a flag in her hands and she definitely got that somewhere. But try explaining
WW's costume with that story to a new reader and you'd be amazed how fast their eyes
glaze over. ;)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Off topic
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 10:29 pm (UTC)biker shortswith white stars now. But I imagine it could have started out as white stars on a black field, but Polly said, no, let's make the stars so bright they shine on well into the new morning.The thing that enrages me is when the costume shrinks so that her cheeks are hanging out, or you can see that she must have had a waxing a few hours earlier. I seem to notice especially when Benes does the art for the Justice League and Diana is featured. I think I can say that none of the artists for Gail's run have had Diana hanging out of the suit, and for that I'm very grateful.
Another thing that bugs me to no end is when home cities are destroyed. Never happens to Metropolis or Gotham, but it's coming up at the start of Straczynski's run for Themiscyra. To me it's like someone decided to blow up the 2500-year-old Parthenon a hundred times over. So dropping this after 600.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 10:45 pm (UTC)Agreed. Though the problem is typically limited to artists outside of her title.
Never happens to Metropolis or Gotham, but it's coming up at the start of Straczynski's run for Themiscyra.
To be fair, Gotham had No Man's Land and I'm pretty sure Metropolis has had its share of damage in the past as well. Though I agree with the sentiment. Themyscira's been through enough. Assuming the solicits aren't hiding some fake out, and possibly even if they are, I'm not so sure I care to continue when JMS takes over.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:04 pm (UTC)(First, what the fuck is Hippolyta wearing in that first bit? A more modern-day nightgown I have seldom seen.)
If you want to send a warrior, dress her in FULL ACTUAL ARMOR THAT WORKS. Not a titsplate (as distinct from a breastplate in that the latter covers the entire chest, while the former stops just in time for the cleavage). If you want to send a diplomat, then you doll her up in the most damn imposing peplos and himation you've got, jewelry to taste. (That's the time for the tiara.) If you want to fuse the two, then you make some effort at fusing the two -- say, with a nice himation to go over the armor, whatever warriors wear at formal non-military functions, the cultural equivalent of dress blues and ceremonial sword, that kind of thing.
You do NOT under any circumstances decide on a)a breastplate that leaves the whole upper chest bare and stabbable, b)panties that...have no reason to exist whatsoever, and c)neither any other armor pieces nor any other distinctively Greek/Amazon garments. It doesn't make any SENSE. What are the Amazons trying to say with this outfit? No other Amazon ever wears anything like it, so there's no sense that she's presenting an image of their culture.
It doesn't say anything, in fact, as an Amazon. And since the only possible justification for, say, the flagrant lack of either a proper chiton or some pants if you want to stretch a point, would be that there was some cultural tradition or message attached, there's no justification for the star-spangled swimsuit either. (When your woman warrior looks weirder and more designed for mocking than the actual Greek images of Amazons, you've got problems. Peplos + breastplate, people! Not that hard!)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 01:20 am (UTC)At a guess, a fairly standard ancient Greek chiton, a slightly fancy one, but she is queen.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:45 pm (UTC)~dramatic flourish to sky~
Utter silence
"..yes? I mean...the fuck is that supposed to give us? I mean..respectfully?"
"The stars! We must create a bikini bottom with stars on the crotch!"
"God..why do we even try? First the fucking bee weapon.."
"BEES ARE FEARSOME!"
"Then we take fashion advice from a nebula. Jesus Christ what next, are we going to invade the United States?"
"......I...I think that will be all..."
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 11:57 pm (UTC)And if only her costume had some BEES on it!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 12:05 am (UTC)On the flip side, for those more imaginative than I, how would you explain the costume? Without changing it, unfortunately (see above about iconical outfit).
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 12:12 am (UTC)Unfortunately it was a sex shop with a really patriotic owner.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 04:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 01:53 am (UTC)I can see the argument - if you're looking at it from a solely meta perspective, a choice between pteyrges and bathing suit is a choice between "Western audience reads her as warlike and, possibly, primitive" and "Western audience reads her as a dismissible sex object," and if you're already completely used to tuning out "sex object" (and it's comics, how could you not be), going from that to "warlike and primitive" will definitely seem like a step down and a danger to the character, and something that will encourage her to be written (and read) in a way that's ever further from the effervescent ambassador of truth and peace she's supposed to be.
I fail to see how that's an argument against a pair of pants or a loincloth or some shoulder straps, though. There are a lot of simple ways to make it light years better, none of which would deviate any more from "obvious and iconic" than changing the colors and ovals of Bruce's uniform or the dozen variations of "headlining Green Lantern."
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 02:37 am (UTC)...oh wait
Well the more civilised romans...
well maybe Marvel shows more sensibility with their ancient Greeks.
Guess I don't see the big deal of an Ancient Greek style hero with some what "Spartan" dress sence
....pun intended.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 03:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 05:51 am (UTC)to newer readers. People ask, why is Diana dressed in the American flag?
And if you have to trot out the Diana Trevor story, believe me, you've already
lost them. It only works in full context--even in truncated flashback it's
extremely ornate and confusing. More importantly, I think there's some
poetry in saying that Diana is a creature of the heavens, and her
outfit represents it the way a frieze represents a culture. It's kind
of something that can't easily be unheard...once you think of the
eagle and the stars and Cassiopeia in that context, I think a lot
of baggage is removed pretty painlessly. It doesn't take away
the Trevor story...but it also makes Diana less exclusively
American, which has been a storytelling problem since before the
Perez issues. An ambassador to the world should not favor only
one nation. If she'd been wearing the hammer and crescent, or
a Muslim flag, how would the rest of the world see her, and could she
really do her mission of peace wearing those colors?
Since I am not, and and cannot imagine ever being a Wonder Woman fan, take this only for what it's worth: I think the above comment is wrong-headed. Trying to explain Wonder Woman's costume as being something other than that she's wearing a stylized American flag will not and can not ever work. As I understand it, the original explanation that Marston offered was that she wore an American flag because she had adopted America as her country, and wanted to be an American hero. That's the only explanation that makes any real sense and doesn't feel forced and contrived.
If you don't want Wonder Woman to do that, if you want her to be a globalist, internationalist hero, so be it, but the classic costume is never going to work with that interpretation of the character. On top of which, it will always come across as obnoxious to some Americans. For a hero who identifies with America and America's cause, to wear our banner honors it. From a character who does not identify with our country and our cause, it comes across as mockery. No rationalization will help that situation.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 06:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: