Brightest Day and Racism
May. 7th, 2010 05:50 pmBrightest Day #1 is out this week, and while the jokes have already been made about the White Power rings supposedly shipped with it, the book itself displays some very troubling racial politics.
This is about four pages out of thirty.
Writers are Geoff Johns and Peter J. Tomasi.
These scenes are, I think, penciled by Ivan Reis and Patrick Gleason (they don't really credit any of the beats individually).
The second beat picks up off the coast of Somalia, where Deadman's found himself on a boat of slavers herding abducted children. But let's take a look here.

Now isn't that nice? The slavers are all black while every one of their captives is white. What is that supposed to say?
The children are saved by the mighty-whitey team of Aquaman and Mera, as has been posted already, but a scene from the aftermath is also worth examining.

Can you guess who this guy is?

If you hadn't figured it out yet, this guy returns to the ocean to resume his criminal career as Black Manta at the end of the issue. Now, the Aquaman/Black Manta relationship is problematic on its own, but Black Manta's history only makes it moreso (especially given that he doesn't even get a real name). Bringing him back in a book called Brightest Day that already has a mark against it is just...inadvisable.
Also, note the black woman among the victims. So far, if you're black in this comic, you can only be a villain or a victim. And what if you try to be a hero?
Well, dear readers, that's where Jason Rusch comes in.
If you'll recall, in Brightest Day #0, Jason tried punching Ronnie Raymond (who's apparently a complete tool now, thanks Geoff Johns!), only to have the two of them merge into Firestorm.
I don't even have to tell you which one's the floating head.

"Someone like you"? And just what is that supposed to mean, Ronnie?

So, Jason's not only had his role stolen by the white guy who used to have it (which is already a disturbing trend throughout the DCU, especially in Johns' work, as Chris Sims at Comics Alliance has also observed), but now he's trapped in that guy's head? Classy!
Any one of these would be problematic in itself, but all three together in the same issue adds up to a tone deaf and racist mess. A kick-off like this does not bode well for where Brightest Day is going.
Ookay, technically there was one black guy who got to be the hero in BD 1.
...The guy in the Colgate ad. He aced it!
This is about four pages out of thirty.
Writers are Geoff Johns and Peter J. Tomasi.
These scenes are, I think, penciled by Ivan Reis and Patrick Gleason (they don't really credit any of the beats individually).
The second beat picks up off the coast of Somalia, where Deadman's found himself on a boat of slavers herding abducted children. But let's take a look here.

Now isn't that nice? The slavers are all black while every one of their captives is white. What is that supposed to say?
The children are saved by the mighty-whitey team of Aquaman and Mera, as has been posted already, but a scene from the aftermath is also worth examining.

Can you guess who this guy is?

If you hadn't figured it out yet, this guy returns to the ocean to resume his criminal career as Black Manta at the end of the issue. Now, the Aquaman/Black Manta relationship is problematic on its own, but Black Manta's history only makes it moreso (especially given that he doesn't even get a real name). Bringing him back in a book called Brightest Day that already has a mark against it is just...inadvisable.
Also, note the black woman among the victims. So far, if you're black in this comic, you can only be a villain or a victim. And what if you try to be a hero?
Well, dear readers, that's where Jason Rusch comes in.
If you'll recall, in Brightest Day #0, Jason tried punching Ronnie Raymond (who's apparently a complete tool now, thanks Geoff Johns!), only to have the two of them merge into Firestorm.
I don't even have to tell you which one's the floating head.

"Someone like you"? And just what is that supposed to mean, Ronnie?

So, Jason's not only had his role stolen by the white guy who used to have it (which is already a disturbing trend throughout the DCU, especially in Johns' work, as Chris Sims at Comics Alliance has also observed), but now he's trapped in that guy's head? Classy!
Any one of these would be problematic in itself, but all three together in the same issue adds up to a tone deaf and racist mess. A kick-off like this does not bode well for where Brightest Day is going.
Ookay, technically there was one black guy who got to be the hero in BD 1.
...The guy in the Colgate ad. He aced it!

no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 04:33 pm (UTC)That leaves Hawkeye, who's a normal human, Wiccan and Speed, who are the children of Scarlet Witch, Hulkling, who's the son of Captain Marvel, and the Vision, who's a robot. Why would anyone else need to take the drug?
And it's not like was snorting crack; he was taking something to give him powers so he could fight crime.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 04:40 pm (UTC)Yeah, you do realise he never claimed that? He said he got them from a blood tranfusion. Which he then really got after the drugs storyline. So the original story of how he got his powers was fine and did not need to be replaced with 'drugs'.
And why did it have to be power-feigning drugs? Why not Kate abusing painkillers to cope with injuries? Billy using amphetamines to cope with all the things going on in his life, or to aid the concentration that makes his magic?
And Young Avengers isn't the only story he's written; he could have decided to save writing a drugs storyline for a different character that wouldn't have been Yet Another Black Character Involved In Drugs/Gangs/Pimping.
He chose to give a black character a drugs storyline. He was not forced to do so.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 04:59 pm (UTC)Or do you mean that is the only heartwarming scene Heinberg is capable of writing? IF ELI HAD NOT TAKEN DRUGS THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO HEARTWARMING, PEOPLE!
"But it allowed for a heartwarming moment" is really not sufficient to justify "making yet another black character a druggie/gang member/pimp".
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 06:39 pm (UTC)And are you really suggesting that the writer is so limited he couldn't have come up with a different heartwarming scene?
And again, a "heartwarming scene" doesn't make it absolutely fine to have yet another black character fall into problematic stereotypes!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:24 pm (UTC)Either one would have been a fantastic rebuttal to the "what you really want is for NO BAD THINGS to happen to minorities EVER!" strawman, too.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:32 pm (UTC)ahaha
Yeah, people don't seem to get that non-stereotypical writing is usually better writing. Less lazy.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:54 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQYckuyW
http://www.amazon.com/Politics-Crys
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 09:55 pm (UTC)ETA: Okay, fair enough about the crystal meth stereotype. I wasn't really aware of that.
Sorry, Kate, guess it's down to you! Or alternately, as another poster pointed out, Heinberg could have saved that story for another title.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-09 11:39 pm (UTC)Tommy is another option. I mean he was in JAIL at one point, so drugs aren't that much of a stretch.
O.o
Date: 2010-05-09 05:14 pm (UTC)But Eli could have gotten the transfusion any other way. He could have been involved in a car accident, etc. The problem is, the story is pretty much a lazy trope told by a white person - black kid, must have drug problems - despite the fact that growing up with a granddad who pretty much lost his mind over the US sanctioned drug stuff might have pushed Eli to go another way.
The problem with this aspect of Eli's character is that the white writer couldn't see the story as any different from teh stereotypes that are put out there with regards to people who aren't white.
Re: O.o
Date: 2010-05-09 06:14 pm (UTC)Re: O.o
Date: 2010-05-09 06:21 pm (UTC)And again, you're missing the point.