Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:49 am (UTC)"Thanos of Titan, you are NOT the Father."
Thanos: Yes! Thank You, now can you PLEASE take that shotgun out of my back?
Galactus:.... Okay.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:19 am (UTC)Ah well, now to see if she'll keep it. I'm interested in seeing Grandpa Galactus change cosmic diapers.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 08:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:20 am (UTC)http://twitter.com/Gali_girl
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:54 am (UTC)...
Yeah, makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:58 am (UTC)Do you know what Stark does in that thing?
And give me back that Ultimate Nullifier!"
Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 04:05 am (UTC)So Galacta's baby could techincally be the same thing. So there is no father, just...cosmic biology?
Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 04:10 am (UTC)Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 04:19 am (UTC)Thankfully, cause my mind was purposely trying to avoid that particular train of thought.
Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 04:34 am (UTC)Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 05:33 am (UTC)Check out The Trial of Reed Richards sometime. Good stuff.
Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 09:17 am (UTC)Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 03:46 pm (UTC)Runaways always has something to say.
Date: 2010-06-10 05:23 pm (UTC)Victor: Don't you dare finish that sentence.
Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 05:00 am (UTC)Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 09:38 am (UTC)Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-16 08:08 pm (UTC)Re: Technically no hanky panky would have to be involved
Date: 2010-06-10 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 04:36 am (UTC)Can't stand the art. Writing's okay, but the art just leaves me cold.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:04 am (UTC)And we have no idea how old Gali is, so no idea how old before breeding happens.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:21 pm (UTC)It'll make up for picking up "Xenogenesis."
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:29 pm (UTC)