We all know Lex Luthor, evil manipulative powermad monster, mostly because we see him through the eyes of Superman and the other heroes where he drops his mask, but to the rest of the DCU, and Metropolis in particular he's a brilliant man, Metropolis' single largest employer, and a well know public figure, a celebrity with an eye for the ladies and (with a bit of bad boy about him) and philanthropist. Sort of like a pro-active Bruce Wayne, with SMARTS!
And how does he retain the common touch? Because he knows people, he really, really does. Okay, he knows them the way a biologist knows the Paramecium he's looking at down a microscope, but he still knows them.
This is from issue 1 of "Lex Luthor: Man of Steel", Brian Azzarello and Lee Bermejo. I was tempted to post a rather fun discourse about TV remotes, but I decided I like this better.... (Actually I could post much of the whole issue because it's just that good.
Luthor is in his office, looking out at a magnificent new building under construction on Gotham, and pondering the nature of humanity and the spirit of creativity and achievment...



"...Lex"
His current amanuensis, Mona, comes in and starts a conversation, including the aforementioned discussion about TV remotes. Mona reminds Lex that that night he is due to attend the Von Rauch Academy Benefit Ball, to hand over his usual VERY generous donation.

Now why would Lex go so far out of his way to help a kid he's never met? Is it part of a long game? Or, as seems more likely, a mercurial whim because he can, because he just... <i>likes</i> Stan? Does it matter? It's just nice to see a little more of Lex than the usual EEEVIIIIILLLLL side.
And how does he retain the common touch? Because he knows people, he really, really does. Okay, he knows them the way a biologist knows the Paramecium he's looking at down a microscope, but he still knows them.
This is from issue 1 of "Lex Luthor: Man of Steel", Brian Azzarello and Lee Bermejo. I was tempted to post a rather fun discourse about TV remotes, but I decided I like this better.... (Actually I could post much of the whole issue because it's just that good.
Luthor is in his office, looking out at a magnificent new building under construction on Gotham, and pondering the nature of humanity and the spirit of creativity and achievment...
"...Lex"
His current amanuensis, Mona, comes in and starts a conversation, including the aforementioned discussion about TV remotes. Mona reminds Lex that that night he is due to attend the Von Rauch Academy Benefit Ball, to hand over his usual VERY generous donation.
Now why would Lex go so far out of his way to help a kid he's never met? Is it part of a long game? Or, as seems more likely, a mercurial whim because he can, because he just... <i>likes</i> Stan? Does it matter? It's just nice to see a little more of Lex than the usual EEEVIIIIILLLLL side.

no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 08:41 pm (UTC)Ah, Lex. You were never better.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 09:16 pm (UTC)Lex in Justice was great and I would love to see more of this man in the main DCU.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 10:01 pm (UTC)I loved this moment too, but the GN as a whole (finally got around to reading my copy) left me slightly confused. What exactly was Lex's game? I mean, I get the whole "Man is the measure of all things" part, but what exactly did destroying his masterpiece achieve?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 11:32 pm (UTC)I don't have the time to go into it but I really loved this scene because it set up that--even though Lex isn't a complete monster the way some writers make him out to be--he's still miles away from understanding Superman's ethical codes because even when he's doing a favor he still sees the world as dog eat dog and that one should never play a long game of chess when you can checkmate in five moves.
There's a ruthless logic to his strategies, yet at the same time its unscrupulous, views the world in terms of finite resources, and shows little empathy to anything that threatens his--however brief--moral high ground.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 11:45 pm (UTC)Just... no Superman. Everything else? Essentially the same. Lex as the protector of the city. He'd be more heroic, without the mirror to reflect. Barely. But Lois... Lois has an attraction to power as much as anything. And they did date. Once upon a time...
no subject
Date: 2010-07-27 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 12:45 am (UTC)If he were truely written as truely wanting the best for humanity then I would like him. But mostly he's just a male Libby.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 01:47 am (UTC)BTW, were you the person who posted scans that traced the history of Luthor's family-- Oh, about a year ago here?
I'm asking, because they'd be helpful to me right now, fanfic-wise, but the tags don't seem to lead to the post in question anymore. Damnit.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 05:21 am (UTC)Well, he is a rich white corporate overlord... it doesn't take that much skill to avoid consequences of his actions.
"Mr. President, I spent all my employees' 401(k)s to build a giant anti-Superman laser. It didn't work. Yeah, bail-out."no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 07:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 08:43 pm (UTC)no hairMoney!"no subject
Date: 2010-07-28 09:02 pm (UTC)