Greetings all! Reading through some old issues of Conan the Barbarian, Spider-Man and Batman pencilled by Gil Kane, I've picked up a trend in his artwork, and I'd like to share it with you guys to get an idea of how well-known this trend is.
Now, what is that trend? The long and short of it is this:

This particular shot, drawn from a low angle and highlighting the bottom of people's noses.
Here's a slightly bigger pic of the above cover (Conan the Barbarian Pocket Book #13, Roy Thomas writing and John Buscema on interior art):

Here's another example from the Conan pocket books (#7, Roy Thomas writing, Gil Kane interior art). Note how there's one larger figure drawn in the upshot with foreground events detailing the present - we'll be seeing more of this soon.

Yet another from the same issue, this time a 3/4-page spread. Take a close look at the bat-creature: Gil Kane even designed his nose to be ideal for the dramatic upshot.

And here's a closeup on the bat-creature itself!

This is far from an isolated incident either. I don't doubt this consideration was on Kane's mind when he designed Morbius in his debut in Spider-Man (The Amazing Spider-Man #101, Roy Thomas writing):

As opposed to an uncostumed vampire? (Never mind, let's not go there)
Once again, dramatic nasal upshot in the back, "action" in the foreground:

(Amazing Spider-Man #104, Roy Thomas writing)
Horrifying as it is, it isn't limited to men and beasts either! Never has Gwen Stacy looked so unappealing. Ugggrgghgh.

(Amazing Spider-Man #97, written by Stan Lee)
And now he tops himself, with a cover comprised purely of that one dramatic angle! Well, there's Spider-Man too.

Now we take a break from nasal upshots and nostrils, to show a self-portrait of the man himself, and his own oddly bulbous nose (and Roy Thomas):

(Conan the Barbarian pocket book #6, Roy Thomas once again)
In fact, nostril shots aside, the way Gil Kane drew noses in general just kept getting weirder and weirder:

Seriously, it's like a couple of rutabagas crawled up their faces and died. Also, relevant cultural references FTW! (Detective Comics #520, Bob Rozakis writing)
Overall, one has to wonder why Gil Kane was so prone to this particular angle and noses in general. Was he a rather short fellow? Was it the main view he saw of people when he sat down drawing? Did he keep a mirror on his desk to reference that angle? Will we ever know?
DISCLAIMER: I have nothing against Gil Kane and his art (I wouldn't have put effort into scanning and cropping these if I really disliked it), just intrigued by the prevalence of this particular shot and focus on the nose in general.
Now, what is that trend? The long and short of it is this:

This particular shot, drawn from a low angle and highlighting the bottom of people's noses.
Here's a slightly bigger pic of the above cover (Conan the Barbarian Pocket Book #13, Roy Thomas writing and John Buscema on interior art):

Here's another example from the Conan pocket books (#7, Roy Thomas writing, Gil Kane interior art). Note how there's one larger figure drawn in the upshot with foreground events detailing the present - we'll be seeing more of this soon.

Yet another from the same issue, this time a 3/4-page spread. Take a close look at the bat-creature: Gil Kane even designed his nose to be ideal for the dramatic upshot.

And here's a closeup on the bat-creature itself!

This is far from an isolated incident either. I don't doubt this consideration was on Kane's mind when he designed Morbius in his debut in Spider-Man (The Amazing Spider-Man #101, Roy Thomas writing):

As opposed to an uncostumed vampire? (Never mind, let's not go there)
Once again, dramatic nasal upshot in the back, "action" in the foreground:

(Amazing Spider-Man #104, Roy Thomas writing)
Horrifying as it is, it isn't limited to men and beasts either! Never has Gwen Stacy looked so unappealing. Ugggrgghgh.

(Amazing Spider-Man #97, written by Stan Lee)
And now he tops himself, with a cover comprised purely of that one dramatic angle! Well, there's Spider-Man too.

Now we take a break from nasal upshots and nostrils, to show a self-portrait of the man himself, and his own oddly bulbous nose (and Roy Thomas):

(Conan the Barbarian pocket book #6, Roy Thomas once again)
In fact, nostril shots aside, the way Gil Kane drew noses in general just kept getting weirder and weirder:

Seriously, it's like a couple of rutabagas crawled up their faces and died. Also, relevant cultural references FTW! (Detective Comics #520, Bob Rozakis writing)
Overall, one has to wonder why Gil Kane was so prone to this particular angle and noses in general. Was he a rather short fellow? Was it the main view he saw of people when he sat down drawing? Did he keep a mirror on his desk to reference that angle? Will we ever know?
DISCLAIMER: I have nothing against Gil Kane and his art (I wouldn't have put effort into scanning and cropping these if I really disliked it), just intrigued by the prevalence of this particular shot and focus on the nose in general.

no subject
Date: 2010-09-25 06:27 am (UTC)