KILLJOY CANUCK (
mad) wrote in
scans_daily2010-10-29 14:40
Entry tags:
Gabby's Playhouse: Discussing Sexism on the Internet
So, recently Kate Beaton made some comments on Twitter about how sometimes guys that like her work will respond with comments she finds creepy/uncomfortable/offensive.
Gabby's Playhouse then did a webcomic entitled "How Every Single Discussion About Sexism and Woman-Type Stuff on the Internet (and real life) Has Ever Happened And Ever Will Happen, Always, Forever, Until the Earth Finally Falls Into The Sun. (Or until the patriarchy is finally dismantled.)"

[Source.]
I don't quite get that last panel, but the rest of it is kinda recognizable.
Gabby's Playhouse then did a webcomic entitled "How Every Single Discussion About Sexism and Woman-Type Stuff on the Internet (and real life) Has Ever Happened And Ever Will Happen, Always, Forever, Until the Earth Finally Falls Into The Sun. (Or until the patriarchy is finally dismantled.)"

[Source.]
I don't quite get that last panel, but the rest of it is kinda recognizable.
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
I said "so-called feminists" because these people are nothing of the sort, and what they want is entirely contradictory to what actually *is* essential to women's rights.
(frozen comment) no subject
Also, isn't Rachel Maddow pretty visible?
(frozen comment) no subject
I said so-called for a reason. She's too much of a fundamentalist to be a feminist and is simply a right-wing Fringe politician, but wraps any and all criticism of herself in the "Sexist pigs" rhetoric that actually *could* be said by say, Rachel Maddow.
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) D'oh:
(frozen comment) Re: D'oh:
(frozen comment) Re: D'oh:
(frozen comment) Mod Note
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
Also: that is a pretty icon.
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
And thank you! I'm actually very bad at using drawing programs on my computer, because I only have a mouse, and while Mac mouses are wonderful for internet use and the other programs I generally use, such as Office, they suck for Gimp (and my cordless usb mouse isn't much better for that purpose). I wound up sketching this on paper, and taking a digital photograph with my webcam to "ink" and color. Because I haven't figured out how to scan with my printer yet. *grin* My stylization form may not always match my anatomy textbook, but at least it is recognizable as a stylized human being, unlike some of the cases of art-fail that tried to be super-realistic and just dropped into the Uncanny Valley. Not saying it's fantastic (even though I'll never complain about getting a compliment, LOL), but I've actually seen worse get published, so I figure that's a pretty good accomplishment for a semester of drawing and painting in high school and overall not quite ten years of independent study between before and after that, largely without many reference books. (I have a love-hate relationship with art-fail posts. I love to poke at where they go wrong. I hate that they made it into publishing. I once re-drew an image of She-Hulk. It was still vaguely pin-up considering the amount of cleavage, but at least the anatomy wasn't as messed up, and her clothes actually looked like they were held up with more than Spirit Gum and the Comics Code, so I called it a win.)
(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) no subject
The thing that ticks me off about "feminism" are that people use the term who want many, many different things - to the exclusion of what others who lose the term want (people who just want to ensure gender equality, people who believe in female supremacy, people who like current gender roles and think they're great for women, just plain nutsos who I wouldn't trust to define fricking anything...). Me, I'd just love to see a day where people in general openly acknowledge that not everyone has the same reproductive organs, but then proceed to not allow what someone does or does not have between their legs dictate their opinion about what that person has between their ears. Is it really that hard for some people to figure out the whole "don't judge a book by its cover" thing in general (with regards to sex, race, etc etc etc)? *dramatic sigh* Again, WTF is Sarah Palin standing for? All I really know about this person is that she is stupid and annoying, and that one of the numerous factors playing into account with regards to my election decisions was the possibility of ending up with her as President if John McCain was elected and (heaven forbid) something happened to him. I admit, it would be nice to have a female President, but I want it to happen because she happens to be the best candidate running for the office that term, not when it is a person like Palin. Ew.
(frozen comment) no subject
In any case, the original comment is actually quite close to derailing this particular discussion and I'm hoping someone locks it before too long. Gonna see if I can find a comic that could actually serve as a basis for this discussion, a comic of this sort is not germane to this.
(frozen comment) no subject
lolz
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) Another bit of fail on my part:
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) Double-D'Oh:
(frozen comment) Re: Double-D'Oh:
(frozen comment) Re: Double-D'Oh:
(frozen comment) Re: Double-D'Oh: