So, recently Kate Beaton made some comments on Twitter about how sometimes guys that like her work will respond with comments she finds creepy/uncomfortable/offensive.
Gabby's Playhouse then did a webcomic entitled "How Every Single Discussion About Sexism and Woman-Type Stuff on the Internet (and real life) Has Ever Happened And Ever Will Happen, Always, Forever, Until the Earth Finally Falls Into The Sun. (Or until the patriarchy is finally dismantled.)"

[Source.]
I don't quite get that last panel, but the rest of it is kinda recognizable.
Gabby's Playhouse then did a webcomic entitled "How Every Single Discussion About Sexism and Woman-Type Stuff on the Internet (and real life) Has Ever Happened And Ever Will Happen, Always, Forever, Until the Earth Finally Falls Into The Sun. (Or until the patriarchy is finally dismantled.)"

[Source.]
I don't quite get that last panel, but the rest of it is kinda recognizable.

Re: Ahem:
Date: 2010-10-30 12:43 am (UTC)I was attempting to apologize for starting unnecessary wank and had figured that my statement that I wished the thread closed having realized that I'd started that had something to do with the closing. I do not consider it a laudatory thing. What I meant by "has been validated" is that it made a point that men tend to defend indefensible sexist statements and then I went ahead and defended an indefensible sexist statement in a knee-jerk reaction. I meant that my reaction helped actually prove the point that men do not react well to being called out.
Essentially it made a point about how men react poorly to being called out and then I went and reacted poorly based on a superficial reading and started an unnecessary brouhaha, showing that the comic was in fact correct as a predictor of how men reacted to these discussions.
Re: Ahem:
Date: 2010-10-30 01:16 am (UTC)Re: Ahem:
Date: 2010-10-30 01:17 am (UTC)