So, recently Kate Beaton made some comments on Twitter about how sometimes guys that like her work will respond with comments she finds creepy/uncomfortable/offensive.
Gabby's Playhouse then did a webcomic entitled "How Every Single Discussion About Sexism and Woman-Type Stuff on the Internet (and real life) Has Ever Happened And Ever Will Happen, Always, Forever, Until the Earth Finally Falls Into The Sun. (Or until the patriarchy is finally dismantled.)"

[Source.]
I don't quite get that last panel, but the rest of it is kinda recognizable.
Gabby's Playhouse then did a webcomic entitled "How Every Single Discussion About Sexism and Woman-Type Stuff on the Internet (and real life) Has Ever Happened And Ever Will Happen, Always, Forever, Until the Earth Finally Falls Into The Sun. (Or until the patriarchy is finally dismantled.)"

[Source.]
I don't quite get that last panel, but the rest of it is kinda recognizable.

no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:14 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) D'oh:
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) Another bit of fail on my part:
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:(frozen) ...
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:17 pm (UTC)A useful rule of thumb when discussing the work of a woman artist, positively or negatively, is to ask yourself if what you’re about to say would apply to identical work that just so happened to have been created by a man. If the answer is “no,” then you’re not talking about the work at all.
I'm a man, and I've used the "have a million of X's babies" line in reference to all kinds of things, male, female, and sexless. Plain and simple, for me and most people who use it, the sex of the target and the actual *act* of procreation do not enter into it.
But...
Kate has the right to be upset by what upsets her, regardless of Intent (it's fucking magic!). If she doesn't like it, she doesn't like it, and people who are aware of it should find other ways to express their squee towards her.
And while I've said such a thing to other posters in various forums about something witty they've said, I know how they'll interpret it because, even if it's virtual, I do have *some* relationship with them. I would never go up to - virtually or physically - Kate, or Ron Moore, or Mark Waid, or Nicole Kidman, who don't know me from Adam and use this line on them. THAT is kind of weird, to me.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:18 pm (UTC)gay men more often than not side with women, or in the very least provide a lense for both sides to relate to :)
then again it mighgt still not get through the logic force field :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:26 pm (UTC)Also kate beaton comics are so great.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:32 pm (UTC)Men are from Mars, women are from Venus ... and it ain't any easier over here on Saturn, let me tell ya.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:Ahem:
From:Re: Ahem:
From:Re: Ahem:
From:Re: Ahem:
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) Counterpoint
Date: 2010-10-29 07:34 pm (UTC)Fangirls: Your performance is so good I want to fuck you.
Maybe we should just call a moratorium on all fucking-based compliments?
(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:(frozen) Re: Counterpoint
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 07:49 pm (UTC)I know saying you wanna have someone's babies somewhat implies that you'll need to have sex with them, but I think the point is not that you find them sexually attractive, but that you think their DNA is awesome and it'd only upgrade your family's genepool if his or her DNA were somehow incorporated into it. The sex part doesn't really factor in.
I'm a straight male, and I've often said I'd want a male comic writer or artist's man-babies.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:This straight white male is not amused by these shenanigans
Date: 2010-10-29 08:00 pm (UTC)If a woman thinks you are being creepy, you are being creepy. This isn't about some objective truth, it is about a person's feeling, which are innately subjective. So, to anybody who gets offended that their comments creeped someone out - don't. Apologize and move on.
Re: This straight white male is not amused by these shenanigans
From:Re: This straight white male is not amused by these shenanigans
From:And I applaud nor non-amusement
From:Re: This straight white male is not amused by these shenanigans
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:22 pm (UTC)Re: PS
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:PS
Date: 2010-10-29 08:25 pm (UTC)Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:Re: PS
From:Re: PS
From:...
From:Re: PS
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:31 pm (UTC)And by 'love', I mean 'what the hell...'
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:33 pm (UTC)But the fact that it's all so familiar is just dispiriting. Is the needle on the bigmassivehuge internet harddisk at CERN just skipping every couple of months?
I have to keep reminding myself "better than a hundred years ago", because the internet is not offering any sense of progress, of forward momentum, of learning.
Bleargh.
More kittens please.
(no subject)
From:Me too!
From:(no subject)
From:Re: Me too!
From:Re: Me too!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:37 pm (UTC)As to the issues involved, I have to agree with what some other folks have said: If someone says "That compliment actually creeps me out", the thing to do is not tell them they're wrong. I think most of us, at some point, have said something that the person we said it to has found inappropriate. And I think that most of us, like courteous individuals, generally apologize and either retract the statement, or rephrase it in a more appropriate way.
Also, WOW at the derailing above. That is textbook. What's frustrating for me is that I can see how the point-missing fellas might get that impression; it's a very easy mindset to fall into. It's badly wrong, of course, but it's also popular; the entire Teabagger movement is based on similar thinking. What startles me is how one can fail to notice that one is perfectly reenacting the cartoonish parable one has JUST READ.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 08:42 pm (UTC)Kate Beaton has WEBCOMICS.
Kate Beaton has an LJ.
Kate Beaton has A LOT OF INTERACTION WITH FANS.
Kate Beaton has had fans, many or most of them male from her personal experience, say something to her that she feels is demeaning to her work, not how she wants to be seen or represented, and is just plain offended by it.
In said quote, Kate Beaton says "DEAR INTERNET", not just "DEAR MEN."
However, MEN all over the internet flip their shit, from her fanboys on various chans to angry rebuttals reblogged and retweeted.
As a lesbosaurus, I will say that it bothers me when girls, particularly straight girls, say things like "Get in my pants now" and "I want to have your babies" when I say something they agree with. Mostly because I am like "dude no way, you'd freak out and get homopanic most likely if I hit on you directly, and P.S. why do you think that's the only kind of validation I want from you? Because I like girls?" Kate, as a heterosexual (ID'd? I'm pretty sure) woman, must face this with men.
Is it any less creepy when fangirls repeat memetic ideas and behavior about RL movie stars or whatever when their response to someone saying something intelligent (which is different than, let's say, displaying yourself for your looks like in modeling or w/e, and even then we can get into nuances about talent and art), with "GET INSIDE ME NOW" and whatnot. But they do not have the similar consistent communication with the object of their affection as Kate Beaton's fans have with her. Men who have this kind of interaction with their fans also might feel creeped out like Kate does by some comments, or just plain annoyed.
Similarly, this comic shows that the systemic response of repeated ideas and parking lot mentality is an IMBALANCED structure in the sexes. It does not mean that it does not exist in the reverse.
Easy squeazy lemon peezy, right?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 09:06 pm (UTC)(Although I was just reading this interview with her at Comics Alliance, and now I feel bad that my first reaction upon loading the link was "Hey, she's really cute.")
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-29 09:19 pm (UTC)