cyberghostface: (Spidey & MJ)cyberghostface ([personal profile] cyberghostface) wrote in [community profile] scans_daily,
@ 2010-12-17 11:47 pm UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Entry tags:char: black cat/felicia hardy, char: carlie cooper, char: mary jane watson, char: spider-man/peter parker, creator: dan slott, creator: humberto ramos, title: amazing spider-man
I might be posting more later, but until then, here are two panels from the latest issue of ASM. 

I'll just let the fail speak for itself here.





(To clarify, the exchange is from MJ's POV. It's to show stupid she is in comparison to Carlie, who "gets" Peter)

If you wanted an additional slice of Spidey!fail...



(Read 190 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

greenmask: (lollerskates?)

Re: Really?


[personal profile] greenmask
2010-12-20 05:08 pm UTC (link)
The 185 comments aren't about the name's provenance, though. They're about the poor character work. Which, as mentioned many times over, is quite evidential without needing to note who the name is shared by.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


Re: Really?


[personal profile] pervymax
2010-12-20 05:37 pm UTC (link)
The comments are about the Mary sue nature of the character, of which the origination of the character's name is not immaterial.

Slightly off topic, but what's happening with Peter reminds me a lot of what happened with suoergirl a while back: Anybody else get that vibe?

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


greenmask: (grr)

Re: Really?


[personal profile] greenmask
2010-12-20 05:41 pm UTC (link)
It is potentially not immaterial but the mary sueishness, again, does not hinge upon this point. It is not necessary for Carlie Cooper Is A Mary Sue to be proven on scans _daily.

Let's let this topic end, OK? Mod line is, please don't mention the daughter. Thank you.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(Read 190 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)