Spider-Man #652 Preview: "Hey Guys, Remember That Character We Made Who No-One Likes?"
Jan. 14th, 2011 08:02 am"I just saw this really cool film we could use to maybe buff her up a little possibly!"
...And A Writing Team Who Couldn't Let Things Lie.
From Ign's Preview Pages:

"My girl. The girl who is mine. We totally bang. Every single night".
Only Dan Slott and Peter could think Flash getting together with Betty is a good idea. Their last relationship was sparked by her helping him to get out of his depression and alcoholism (he promptly dumped her off-panel when this was over). He's recently suffered MORE depression from his paraplegia. Meanwhile she is ludicrously attempting to write a newsblog based only on the bleary sleep-mutterings of her roommate. And in the above panel, she looks like the drunk one.

...Actually, MJ...cover up that rictus grin, and what you get is a man who looks horribly sad...and not just put-off, seriously depressed. Just looking at him makes me imagine the man bashing his skull against a brick wall out of the sheer frustration of how rotten his life is. Perhaps the artist sympathises with us more than Slott does.
So...Mary-Jane Watson - bitter, self-obsessed, or...

...a dull mouthpiece for Slott's antagonism against anyone who questions his will?
Also: that second panel is just SCREAMING the word 'Threesome'. Look at the douche! That is no warm smile of amusement...his head is filled with visions of girl-on-girl or I'll fry my bowler!
...And A Writing Team Who Couldn't Let Things Lie.
From Ign's Preview Pages:

"My girl. The girl who is mine. We totally bang. Every single night".
Only Dan Slott and Peter could think Flash getting together with Betty is a good idea. Their last relationship was sparked by her helping him to get out of his depression and alcoholism (he promptly dumped her off-panel when this was over). He's recently suffered MORE depression from his paraplegia. Meanwhile she is ludicrously attempting to write a newsblog based only on the bleary sleep-mutterings of her roommate. And in the above panel, she looks like the drunk one.

...Actually, MJ...cover up that rictus grin, and what you get is a man who looks horribly sad...and not just put-off, seriously depressed. Just looking at him makes me imagine the man bashing his skull against a brick wall out of the sheer frustration of how rotten his life is. Perhaps the artist sympathises with us more than Slott does.
So...Mary-Jane Watson - bitter, self-obsessed, or...

...a dull mouthpiece for Slott's antagonism against anyone who questions his will?
Also: that second panel is just SCREAMING the word 'Threesome'. Look at the douche! That is no warm smile of amusement...his head is filled with visions of girl-on-girl or I'll fry my bowler!

Dear Team Spider-Man;
Date: 2011-01-14 08:14 am (UTC)Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
Date: 2011-01-14 12:02 pm (UTC)Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
From:Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
From:Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
From:Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
From:Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
From:Re: Dear Team Spider-Man;
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:22 am (UTC)Also, oh my god, ROLLER DERBY? REALLY? I just...it's so...twee and trying too hard to be cool. This really isn't an issue with it being in Spiderman, I'd feel the same about it no matter what comic it was in shoe-horned into.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:31 am (UTC)Corroborating evidence for this hypothesis: the Roller Derby episode of Psych was basically ass.
And Psych is fantastic the overwhelming majority of the time!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:41 am (UTC)Otherwise I might forget the difference between those characters and these alternate universe author's-mouthpiece doppelgangers long enough to do something totally crazy like pay actual money for one of these comics! A dreadful happenstance which Mr. Slott is clearly working just as hard to avoid as I am.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 08:57 am (UTC)You know what if they are so insistent on Carlie sticking around, then they need to stop the stupid shit and stop with making it feel so forced. No way in hell you can tell me that it's not forced.
Also..seriously I usually love Betty but woooow this is the first time I've seen her drawn so horribly that I'm just turned off from her. She looks like someone who needs to lay off the alcohol and needs to catch more z's.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 09:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 09:23 am (UTC)Honestly, it would be better if they'd stop having people like MJ and Peter go on about how great Carlie really his and instead actually show us why she is great/so perfect for Peter/the best girlfriend ever/whatevs. Seriously, out of all the stuff I've read with Carlie in it, all I've really learned is that she's really into forensic stuff, she's nerdy, and aside from that, she really doesn't have much of a personality and is boring. Oh, and she does roller derby. Yay, I guess. :/ I know I'll probably tick some people of with this, but this is pretty much the same reason why I never liked Gwen and Peter. I just never found Gwen interesting enough to get invested in her character and that's basically what I feel for Carlie. Which is sad since Carlie is a new character and they could do ANYTHING they wanted with her to make her original and exciting.
You know what makes me really sad about this whole Spider-Man thing now? I just realized it recently. After BND started, I was (and still am) very upset about the MJ and Peter thing, but I still bought the new comics, hoping the story would at least be good. I stopped buying monthly around the time the whole Peter/Black Cat sex friends thing started and after that would browse through the new issues in the store and would only buy new issues if I thought the storyline looked interesting. The sad part is, I realized that after OMD, that every issue of Spider-Man that I enjoyed, I liked them not because of Peter, but because of other characters in the story. I find it really sad that I don't actually like Peter when I read Spider-Man comics now. :(
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 09:34 am (UTC)They've spent so much time showing how perfect Carlie is.
It is inevitable she is going to die. Or become a villain..
OR BOTH.
Get your tickets now folks.
PS: oh peters happy for once just not with me WTF? How many d'aww moments did those two have? None of their great history was erased, they just never got married. Peter still goes with MJ like Dark Self Depreciating Chocolate and Peanut butter.
Also anyone notice Peter totally flirting with MJ there?
"Lady, you are one class act".
Notice how even though Carlie is skating around in a sports bra and short shorts, the chemistry REMAINS with MJ, only now the focus of this Chemistry is "I LOVE CARLIE SO MUCH AND TOTALLY NOT THIS REDHEAD I AM APPRECIATING OVER AND OVER AGAIN IN A TOTALLY NON SEXUAL WAY EVEN THOUGH SHE ROCKS THAT AWESOME HAT"
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 09:38 am (UTC)It didn't take and we got MJ back (eventually), and Jill, as well as her father and brother, dissipated into mist.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:And Marvel KEEPS DOING THIS
From:Re: And Marvel KEEPS DOING THIS
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 10:05 am (UTC)Why o why can't we just have Peter Parker and Mary Jane?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 10:24 am (UTC)That said, the art is... Ew. It's kind of Pseudo-Ramos-y but without the energy and fun.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 11:24 am (UTC)Art's kinda nice though, not like that Ramos crap we've been getting. Some young artist who hasn't had the joy drained out of him yet I guess.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:14 pm (UTC)The weird thing is, the art makes it look like a lot of what the characters are saying/narrating is sarcastic or covering up dissatisfaction. Peter totally doesn't look like he's enjoying any of this, and comes off as someone who doesn't like Derby at all but is faking it for Carlie's sake.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:30 pm (UTC)Well, actually, speedball would be even better but since they started with 'roller'...
<-- nerd. Like there was any doubt.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 12:48 pm (UTC)Dear Marvel:
STOP SUCKING.
Can we get ONE BLOODY ISSUE where you don't bring up the stupid "Parker Luck" thing? You asshats don't get the friggin' point: Peter isn't unlucky, he's unlucky BECAUSE HE'S SPIDER-MAN. The recurring theme when this "Parker Luck" thing came about was that Peter Parker would have the best life in the world if it wasn't for his responsibilities as Spider-Man. Since you guys have decided that he shouldn't be responsible, then stop bringing up his stupid bad luck. And for chirssakes, stop mentioning every time something goes right for him that he's finally beat that darned "Parker Luck." YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT. AGAIN.
And yes, I know you desperately want to relive your childhood by using all the old clichés that used to be around when you were kids, but Mary Jane does not have to say, "Go get 'em, Tiger," in EVERY APPEARANCE. Hell, just keep her out of the damned book entirely if her only purpose is going to be constantly telling the audience that they should like your newest Mary Sue love interest. Newsflash: NO ONE LIKES CARLIE. Stop shoving her down people's throats.
I don't even care about Spider-Man 99% of the time and even I see how much of a bleeding crime it is to write your most recognizable character this badly. It's not even a matter of bad plotting. All you guys have to do to suck less is to stop spouting stupid irrelevant clichés and to actually SHOW CARLIE DOING SOMETHING COOL OR INTERESTING if you want to make the readers like her.
Just stop it. Stop writing the book like this. Stop doing this to Spider-Man. STOP SUCKING.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 01:54 pm (UTC)But instead it's told from MJ POV which makes her seem like a much more important character.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:39 pm (UTC)SHOW, DON'T TELL DAMNIT!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:43 pm (UTC)Also hadn't MJ moved on from the relationship with Peter - with the actor douche Bobby "Steroidhead" Carr (in a story written by Slott himself IIRC). She was even quasi-living with the guy before she came back to NYC. Now she's back and she's basically written as thinking all the time about Peter's love life. It doesn't compute.
It's funny except for the Spidey books I never get the feeling from Marvel that they're trying to give a "FU" to the old readers. But with everything post-Mephisto it's like you can't open a Spidey book without seeing it (probably not actually the case but it just seems that way to me).
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 03:29 pm (UTC)Anyway, Aunt May with her hair down is one of the most unsettling things I'Ve ever seen.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 06:04 pm (UTC)Rollerskates? And safe violence?
Little hearts in my eyes.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 03:42 pm (UTC)I will continue to read Ultimate Spider-Man where I still like these characters.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 05:08 pm (UTC):p
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 04:00 pm (UTC)On top of that weren't they trying to set up Charlie as a smart nerdy girl to be "perfect" for Peter? Roller Derby is just about the wrongest sport one could possibly find to do that.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-14 05:25 pm (UTC)If the parallel continues, I'm going to end up shipping MJ/Carlie and pairing Peter up with his blond BFF, Johnny.I think that they're doing Carlie a big disservice by trying to push her as The One, endorsed by all and sundry. Like others have said, maybe if they actually showed things from Carlie's perspective, instead of having others wax rhapsodic while she remains a cipher, she might be more accepted.If I never have to hear/read the phrase "Parker Luck" again, it'll be all too soon.
I...don't think I like this art very much. Everybody has a weird case of putty lips going on. :/