With Palin still in the news, Blue water Comics made a sequel comic for her... remember the first one, with the "Not Jiminy Cricket" narrating about her life. Well, the preview for it included something that I never expected from comics... they actual talk about how Obama isn't such a great president.


I am not posting this out of political reasons, as I am a republican myself, but that's not the case here. I cam posting because we all experiance the Obama-Hype in comics. Savage Dragon, Youngblood, Spider-Man, Athena, and other company and characters tried to milk the people's love of Obama... though I am sure the majority who bought the Obama issue of Spider-Man were trying to get rich via 90s promotional schemes (hologram foil covers and such BS). But still, I didn't expect to find this in a comic..... your thoughts?


I am not posting this out of political reasons, as I am a republican myself, but that's not the case here. I cam posting because we all experiance the Obama-Hype in comics. Savage Dragon, Youngblood, Spider-Man, Athena, and other company and characters tried to milk the people's love of Obama... though I am sure the majority who bought the Obama issue of Spider-Man were trying to get rich via 90s promotional schemes (hologram foil covers and such BS). But still, I didn't expect to find this in a comic..... your thoughts?

no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 08:29 pm (UTC)That being said; being a democrat myself, I voted for Obama (if only cause I didn't care for McCain or Palin), and I did kind of expect him to fix stuff.
But as it turns out he's just another politician who gets nothing done. If nothing else it can be said he hasn't made anything worse, and he hasn't had any major fuck ups like Bush did. He just hasn't lived up to the hype.
Personally though, I also blame the Democratic party itself; since they're so busy trying to please everyone and infighting, they NEVER GET ANYTHING FUCKING DONE.
Look at the Healthcare reform. Up until Ted Kennedy died they had an unfillerbusterable majority in the house. They literally couldn't lose, AND THEY STILL COULDN'T PASS IT. Then when they last the majority, it took nearly a year of arguing, and compromising, and bullshit to finally get it passed.
And yesterday, the now republican controlled house voted to repeal it, with all the Republicans voting unanimously to pass it.
So damn you Democrats with your wishy washyness and infighting, and damn you Republicans with your evil alien hive mind powers. All politics are rubbish as far as I'm concerned.
For the record, I'm on the Medicaid, so the Healthcare bill didn't affect me when it was enacted and it wont affect me now that its gone. I'm still sucking on the Government teat. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 12:31 am (UTC)http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.c
no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 06:49 am (UTC)I need a site like that.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 08:29 pm (UTC)Balancing the budget is in theory relatively easy.
Social Security has not kept pace with demographic changes. People live too long.
The US spend more on its military than the rest of the world combined
The problem is there is no political will to do any of those let alone all of them.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 08:37 pm (UTC)The style sheet for this page needs some upgrades.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 01:10 pm (UTC)For the income brackets that really need social security, life expectancy at the time of retirement has not changed very much.
Also, it's Medicare, not Social Security, that's been growing gangbusters in cost.
Paul Krugman's on top of this, you can search his blog archive for details.
Agreed that the Defense budget is totally ridiculous.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 02:06 pm (UTC)That makes a lot of sense. Most of the standard childhood killers have been knocked back by immunization.
I wonder what the life expectancy of people who actually make it to retirement is. Removing all of the people who die at 40 and whatnot.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 05:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 11:16 pm (UTC)I hate it when people play the blame game, because I've studied history enough to know everything has at least SEVERAL reasons for happening.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 11:17 pm (UTC)Oh, well.
Date: 2011-01-20 11:37 pm (UTC)Re: Oh, well.
Date: 2011-01-21 01:02 am (UTC)Today is another day, and now I can.
Date: 2011-01-21 10:18 am (UTC)Let's not even go to the Republicans, who gave the world Sarah Palin, and tried to push the meme that Palin's six colleges in five years (or five colleges in six years?) was in the same breath as Obama's Harvard law degree. Or when, in their quest for American 'exceptionalism' dumbed down the VP segment and with that all she could do was pipe, 'drill baby drill' and wink.
I remember when Regan (father of America according to the GOP) put forth the notion of the Welfare Queen as a black woman just popping out kids like frogs laying spawn (when the stats show that more white people are on welfare than blacks), and the 'voodoo' economics. OMG. The OIlie North scandal (thank you, Enquirer), the school for South American dictators that the Repubs set up and sponsored. OMG.
My relatives, when Regan died, they did a soft shuffle, that's how bad that guy was.
That's not even speaking about Bush II and his eight years of recklessness when the GOP stayed mum on tax cuts, and getting into two wars and now that Obama has the mess to clean up every single white tea party member is all, "It took Obama to help me find my voice" and when you ask them where their full throated disapproval was when Bush II was spending their surplus (that Clinton left behind OMG) like a drunken sailor on leave, they go, "But he was Christian."
Same thing with Sarah Palin, and her 'taking back America for real Americans!' and people explaining that well, she means an America without migrants and when I go, "You mean, the First Peoples? The ones who've said that Obama has been the first President to take their concerns on board?" they ignore that point and go on.
Not saying that Obama is perfect- no. There are things that I wish he'd have stood firmly on, but the GOP is the party of 'no' and not much else. But he's pretty much held to a different standard than his white Presidential predecessors. Obama can't go all 'Suge knight' because he will get the 'angry black man' treatment. He's called soft, and people make assumptions about his manhood because he refuses to go all stereotype. Or him extending tax cuts because the GOP would have moved to slash benefits for the unemployed.
In addition, Fox news (and the reason why I wish Murdock will stay the hell away from any British media, because I've seen what Fox news represents to a certain sort of embittered segment of the population) and it's coverage of everything Obama has pretty much put a bad taste in my mouth, as well as being Palin's employer and public relations mouthpiece.
So yeah, between the media, the GOP, the teaparty funded by the Koch brothers, Republican squillionaires who have a vested interest in seeing Obama's policies fail, even at the cost of making America's economy even more toxic? Or Ailies, head of Fox news, aka GOP talking points tannoy making propaganda instead of actual news? When GOP senators can actually tell the POTUS, "You lie!" without respect for his office? Or Boehner can turn down state dinners with the Chinese head of state (the one who's going to drink America's milkshake, they will... drink it up!) so he can get his (alleged) drank on? Or Limbaugh the pied piper of the GOP doing a racist mockery of how the Chinese head of state spoke? Or McCain against DADT even though it puts gay personnel at a disadvantage to their straight counterparts?
I'm surprised that Obama has been able to do anything at all.
I'm just surprised that after eight years of Bush, two years of tea party candidates (who are now in the Senate and don't want to give up that good gov'ment health care they now have - principles that they got in power for be damned... so soon), that Republicans have the gall to consider themselves a moral majority and ready to go all tsk, tsk, tsk.
Ah, Palin. The woman who the American MSM just wouldn't vet. The one who can see Russian from her house. The one who, when it came time to comfort the grievers in Tuscan, Ariz, made the moment all about her and bandied the term 'blood libel' like it was no thang.
Right, I gotta go. Stick a fork in me because I am done.
Re: Today is another day, and now I can.
Date: 2011-01-21 12:59 pm (UTC)I'm not American, but I do follow U.S. politics, but not nearly to the extent I follow Canadian politics, obviously. But from what I've read, seen and heard, he's certainly not sitting around with his thumbs up his ass.
But I don't really feel like getting into it (I just don't have the energy to defend the politics of a country that's not my own), as I also feel it's more off-topic than anything, really. (Even though I think you had some important things to say!)
Well yeah, same here
Date: 2011-01-21 01:06 pm (UTC)I know that the cultures are different, and with Aunty (BBC) to buffer the madness of the more extreme newscasting (I find that Sky over here isn't as extreme as Fox , but I'm wary when I have to watch Sky over say, BBC). But I've seen Murdoch's paw prints on The Sun and The Times and how they were shilling for Cameron - hard. So yeah, constant vigilance for me.
I also feel it's more off-topic than anything, really
True, which is why I'm just going to knit now, yes...
Re: Well yeah, same here
Date: 2011-01-21 07:23 pm (UTC)Cheers for the correction
Date: 2011-01-21 07:29 pm (UTC)Alas, I can't change the post since people have responded to it.
Gahh, grammar fail.
Date: 2011-01-21 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 11:44 pm (UTC)Though I confess it does upset me to see Obama getting the blame for 8 years of failed Republican policies.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-20 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 03:47 am (UTC)Active stimulus is usually more constructive than passive stimulus. But one problem is that we ran huge deficits for ages, & were actually sort of over-stimulated. We needed the taxes to fund the entitlements we ran, & we went for debt and an inflated bond market instead. Another problem is that now the solution on many lips is "austerity" which will hurt a lot of people who are already underpaid & overleveraged. At some point we need to make the small group financiers who control half the nation's wealth feel some of the bite themselves instead of trying to throw it off on others.
But yeah, Obama isn't all that great. Neither was Bush, neither--I think--would have been Romney or McCain--nor Palin.
I used to be GOP, but now I think we need more Kucinich types & fewer of the Reagan-idolizing pretty-boys & boll weevils that dominate the GOP.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 08:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 03:51 pm (UTC)Say, don't they owe him royalties for using him in their stories?
no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-21 07:24 pm (UTC)