Censorship is bad, mmkay?
Jan. 28th, 2011 07:19 pmOn a more positive note, while digging through my "things to post" folder I found these fun little pages from Liberty Comics, a 2008 special that Image put out to benefit the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (a nonprofit dedicated to protecting comics creators from censorship and legal abuse). A number of big-name creators contributed stories of varying lengths and quality; these are my favorites.

First we have a cute little relatively apolitical story by Darwyn Cooke and Dave Stewart, called "The Deadly Book," narrated by a guy who steals a rare book from his grandfather.

He plans to sell it on eBay, but curiosity runs deep in the monkey brain so he takes a look at the thing first.

There's also the noir-y depressing "No One Rides for Free", by Brubaker and Phillips. A reporter in the middle of a story gets assaulted on the roof during his cigarette break.


On a more hopeful note, there's this little one page story by J Bone.

And finally, just for the lulz, here's Mignola's contribution.


First we have a cute little relatively apolitical story by Darwyn Cooke and Dave Stewart, called "The Deadly Book," narrated by a guy who steals a rare book from his grandfather.

He plans to sell it on eBay, but curiosity runs deep in the monkey brain so he takes a look at the thing first.

There's also the noir-y depressing "No One Rides for Free", by Brubaker and Phillips. A reporter in the middle of a story gets assaulted on the roof during his cigarette break.


On a more hopeful note, there's this little one page story by J Bone.

And finally, just for the lulz, here's Mignola's contribution.


no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 02:37 am (UTC)It's something I wish people had around here.
Also, "It kills you with it's shittiness" is wrong grammar. Should be "its".
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 02:56 am (UTC)Censorship is having someone (a censor, named after the roman official) looking through a work *before* publication and judging if it should be banned or not (and possibly making edits)
Making someone legally responsible for something *after* publication is not censorship.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 11:42 am (UTC)I like the Brubaker one particularly.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 12:20 pm (UTC)Basically it wouldn't matter what kind of leaders we have until a good dictator seizes power from all of them.
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 04:39 pm (UTC)No more stomach rumbles for you, Gokuban!
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 05:19 pm (UTC)And free speech in the southern states works both ways. There's a statue near the Hermitage outside Nashville that people have been trying to get removed for years for it's allegedly racist connotations.
http://www.blueshoenashville.com/histor
no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-01-29 11:37 pm (UTC)