thehefner: (Default)
[personal profile] thehefner posting in [community profile] scans_daily
A couple months back, I got into yet another debate with someone about why I hated Batman using a gun in Final Crisis. I meant to post this at the time as a canonical response, but got distracted with IRL stuff and general geekery at my Two-Face fanblog. Besides, I figured this might be controversial, since it's a controversial real-life topic combined with a controversial comic topic, taken from a comic that was deeply controversial at the time it was released: Batman: Seduction of the Gun.

B:SotG was an anti-gun one-shot published as a benefit issue for the John Reisenbach Foundation for gun-control education activities, a fact which wasn't revealed to readers until the end. DC was flooded with angry letters from gun owners and Second Amendment advocates, many of which were published in the early Knightfall issues. Many letters were along the lines of "My heart goes out to the Reisenbach family, what a tragedy, BUT STILL GUN CONTROL IS BAD I FEEL BETRAYED FOR ACCIDENTALLY DONATING MONEY TO THIS CAUSE." I could do a whole post about that comic and the response it got.

So it might be a bit unfair to use these pages as my reasoning why Batman would never use a gun, and would always find another way to save the day because he's frickin' Batman. It's a very biased perspective. But in this case, I believe it also entirely fits with Batman as a character, and how he's always reacted to guns and gun violence.

WARNING: this is the single most graphic description of exactly how the Waynes died.

Some context: Hudson, a teenage friend of Tim's, decided to show off his father's gun to the guys. In classic After-School Special fashion, he started horsing around and it went off in the friend's living room.

I think it's the first two panels on the last page that really make this, in that it shows how much Bruce elevates Thomas Wayne in memory. Never mind that Thomas was human, and could easily have been killed another way. The point is, that's just how ingrained this ideal is into Bruce's character.

That said, I'm sure there's a point to be made about how Final Crisis was so powerful because he managed to overcome his feelings to do the right thing, yadda yadda yadda. If the story worked for you, well, there's nothing I can say. But for me--and I suspect for many Batman readers--this is why we can never imagine Bruce pulling the trigger on anybody. I could sooner see him shoving the god-bullet into Darkseid by hand. Because he's the goddamn Batman, after all.

Date: 2011-04-16 09:07 am (UTC)
proteus_lives: (Default)
From: [personal profile] proteus_lives
I think you're clever enough. I've always enjoyed your contributions to S_D

Date: 2011-04-16 02:41 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
For the twelfth time: A Right to Drive is enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Under those circumstances, would you consider driving licenses authoritarian bullshit?

Date: 2011-04-17 08:05 am (UTC)
proteus_lives: (Default)
From: [personal profile] proteus_lives
Still need the background.

Date: 2011-04-17 11:17 am (UTC)
valtyr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
No, you don't need me to list the individual made-up reasons that hundreds of people had for voting in a piece of legislation. You absolutely do not, and your claim to is simply laughable, as in I literally find it incredible you are saying 'I can't pretend! I'm incapable of pretending or imagining!'

It's quite clear you have no answer to the question. You cannot defend your position because you don't have a coherent position.

For the thirteenth time: A Right to Drive is enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Under those circumstances, would you consider driving licenses authoritarian bullshit?

Date: 2011-04-19 11:23 pm (UTC)
proteus_lives: (Default)
From: [personal profile] proteus_lives
I think it's amazing you think your positions exist in a vacuum.

Date: 2011-04-20 09:38 am (UTC)
valtyr: (carol laughing)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
I'm sorry, are you suggesting because I don't have the time or inclination to write out thirty-eight fictional accounts of how individual states ratified a fictional amendment in a hypothetical question, I think my positions exist in a vacuum?

No, you're incapable of defending your position, which is why you're asking for nonsensical levels of detail. If I provided those thirty-eight accounts, you would then demand the individual biography of every legislator, because you're trying to distract from the fact you ain't got shit.


scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily


Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

September 2017

      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20212223

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags