it's that I can give credit where credit is due. I'm not a fan of much of Devin Grayson's output, but she can write a darn good character scene, Jim Lee tends to leave me unimpressed, but he can draw a darn pretty Dynamic Duo from time to time.
And so, in the interests of fairness and honesty I have to say that I liked this inteview up at newsarama
In which Judd Winick speaks about his forthcoming arc on Batman and Robin....
Nrama: But this Batman isn't Bruce. This is Dick. What are Jason's feelings about him?
Winick: Jason hates Dick Grayson. He's the good son; he's the one that worked out; he's the one that "Dad" loves best. For me, there's a philosophy behind Jason and Dick that I haven't had a chance to play out fully. I don't think it's going to play out in this story, because it's probably not the place for it. But I don't mind putting the philosophy out there:
One thing that haunts Jason is that he thinks if Dick Grayson who was the one that was about to die, Batman would have saved him.
And worse, if Dick Grayson was murdered, Jason knows that Batman would have killed Joker. He knows that in his heart.
The dark, dark thing for Jason is that he doesn't feel Bruce's refusal to take revenge on the Joker is just about Batman's morals and code that he won't break. He thinks it's about him. He thinks that if Dick Grayson was the one who was murdered, Batman would have definitely killed Joker.
Nrama: So what do Dick and Damian think of Jason as they are forced to kind of team-up with him in this story?
Well, you'll need to go to the interview page to read the answer to that, it's only fair to Newsarama. :)
That's a nice summation of Jason Todd's feelings for Bruce and Dick, and expressed more clearly than I think it has been shown in the comics (IMHO of course). Especially the notion that Jason is convinced that if Dick had died, Bruce WOULD have killed the Joker (The events in "Infinite Crisis" where Bruce pulls a gun on Alex Luthor sort of support that, depending on how you read the original scene) This actually makes me want to read the issues to see how it plays out. Kudos to Mr Winick for that.
For context, the cute, how Jason probably views the role of Robin (These were designed by one of my favourite artists Andy Price for Lego Batman T-shirt that alas, they only made in child sizes, because I would wear the hell out of any of them!)

For fun, the sublime, the history of the Robins, in animated form

Which originated here
And for legality, the ridiculous, in the form of a "Context is for the weak" from "Batman: The Cult"

And so, in the interests of fairness and honesty I have to say that I liked this inteview up at newsarama
In which Judd Winick speaks about his forthcoming arc on Batman and Robin....
Nrama: But this Batman isn't Bruce. This is Dick. What are Jason's feelings about him?
Winick: Jason hates Dick Grayson. He's the good son; he's the one that worked out; he's the one that "Dad" loves best. For me, there's a philosophy behind Jason and Dick that I haven't had a chance to play out fully. I don't think it's going to play out in this story, because it's probably not the place for it. But I don't mind putting the philosophy out there:
One thing that haunts Jason is that he thinks if Dick Grayson who was the one that was about to die, Batman would have saved him.
And worse, if Dick Grayson was murdered, Jason knows that Batman would have killed Joker. He knows that in his heart.
The dark, dark thing for Jason is that he doesn't feel Bruce's refusal to take revenge on the Joker is just about Batman's morals and code that he won't break. He thinks it's about him. He thinks that if Dick Grayson was the one who was murdered, Batman would have definitely killed Joker.
Nrama: So what do Dick and Damian think of Jason as they are forced to kind of team-up with him in this story?
Well, you'll need to go to the interview page to read the answer to that, it's only fair to Newsarama. :)
That's a nice summation of Jason Todd's feelings for Bruce and Dick, and expressed more clearly than I think it has been shown in the comics (IMHO of course). Especially the notion that Jason is convinced that if Dick had died, Bruce WOULD have killed the Joker (The events in "Infinite Crisis" where Bruce pulls a gun on Alex Luthor sort of support that, depending on how you read the original scene) This actually makes me want to read the issues to see how it plays out. Kudos to Mr Winick for that.
For context, the cute, how Jason probably views the role of Robin (These were designed by one of my favourite artists Andy Price for Lego Batman T-shirt that alas, they only made in child sizes, because I would wear the hell out of any of them!)
For fun, the sublime, the history of the Robins, in animated form
Which originated here
And for legality, the ridiculous, in the form of a "Context is for the weak" from "Batman: The Cult"

no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:08 pm (UTC)Or there's Amazon, which has a few, including this one
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:10 pm (UTC)Can be obtained in the UK from play.com in an adult size, but it's perhaps a little... disturbing.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:33 am (UTC)Or that's what I heard, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:50 pm (UTC)Aaaw, I wish they'd kept that in the DS version. (Though I can see why they didn't.)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:50 pm (UTC)O Lego Batman is twisted......
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:52 pm (UTC)Then I got distracted by the fact that that's not what the connector on Lego minifig legs looks like.
Then I laughed at myself for being so nitpicky, and laughed again.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:19 pm (UTC)Neat stuff. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:34 pm (UTC)Still there are some other nice bits like the recasting of "The Batman" opening title frame here
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:59 pm (UTC)Blues Wayne, I think, is Bruce's singing cousin.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:53 am (UTC)Matches Malone's jazzy twin bro???
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:16 pm (UTC)I was stunned to realise that "The Cult" is still apparently in canon (Deacon Blackfire showed up as a Black Lantern)
It does have a nice scene or two with Jason as Robin being about as badass as he ever got to be, but the overall sub-DKR grotesquery of it put me off it big time (And I really hate having to say that about anything by Berni Wrightson, a genuinely awesome artist)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:45 am (UTC)I'd love to get the one with the sidekick reassembly image. Yeah, I think it sums up Jason's problem with the Tim-replacement quite succinctly!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:47 pm (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 10:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:54 pm (UTC)Also, Batman did everything he could to kill the Joker immediately after you died, Jason Todd. Shut up, Jason Todd.
Finally, YOU ARE NOW ALIVE JASON TODD, SHUT THE FUCK UP JASON TODD.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:36 am (UTC)He's also interacted with Bruce, the Joker, Dick, Tim, even Donna for a while, he should have picked up on what went on after his death from those experiences.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:43 am (UTC)And simply because he's interacted with all of them still doesn't mean that they've told him. Because they haven't. Certainly not in any canon scene I've read. Other than Tim saying, "no one could forget you," and Jason being in the Batcave and seeing his Robin memorial. I think it's kind of like asking the character to be a mind-reader when he doesn't have those abilities. But how is he supposed to glean that Bruce did try to kill the Joker from that?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:19 am (UTC)That said, I see you point and now more than ever I want to see Jason encounter Alfred.... perhaps after a little chat with Superman about what went down during the helicopter flight.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:32 am (UTC)Yep, he did... but he still hasn't told Jason about that. (Bruce not telling him, Bruce shutting down, even how Bruce treated Dick post-Jason's death, which was really a lot of hurtful stuff -- I'm thinking about the Marv Wolfman written scene)
That said, I see you point and now more than ever I want to see Jason encounter Alfred.... perhaps after a little chat with Superman about what went down during the helicopter flight.
So do I. I don't think Jason would have anything against Alfred and hopefully Alfred could at least give him a different perspective of which to see things from.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 10:16 am (UTC)"I expected better from you Master Jason." should stop any member of the Batfamily (even the estranged ones) in their tracks and make them rethink their course of action.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:21 am (UTC)Batman didn't avenge Jason's death, and yet Jason is alive again. Thus, we can draw at least one of two conclusions. A) Vengeance is pointless. B) Lack of vengeance leads to resurrections.
In other words, shut up Jason Todd.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:03 am (UTC)1) Whine and complain and kill people about how your death was never avenged
or
2) Go "Whoah, hey! I'm alive again! Yay!"
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 05:11 am (UTC)but
I'm pretty sure that having your brains beaten out by a crowbar (while Mom watches impassively) and getting blown up while your mother watches AS A YOUNG TEENAGER and then after digging yourself out of your grave and suffering memory loss and general brain trauma, then some pretty weird circumstances (living with villains who actively encourage your negative feelings about the situation) and then finding out the dude who not only killed you, but your mother is still at large and killing people and nobody is doing shit to stop him.
Well.
I'm sure you'd just "get over it".
Like it or not, Jason brings up some pretty legit issues about Bruce occasionally even if he's a terror and doing bad shit. And I can't really blame him for being mentally unstable and blaming Bruce for certain things after what he's been through.
Then again, I just generally side against Bruce, who treats his kids like shit. All the time. And never stops. So I don't mind in the least if one of them gives him hell, even if some of the reasons are specious.
(I probably won't reply to whatever you post back, I'm busy right now and just don't actually care about arguing about Jason. Just had to reply once for some reason, in a weird mood.)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 06:19 am (UTC). . .
. . . no.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:09 am (UTC)Count me as one of the people who thinks Jason has semi-legitimate reasons to feel the way he does.
Even someone who thinks Jason is useless should admit that perhaps then Bruce shouldn't have used him. Because that's what Jason thinks happened, and he is at least half right.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:21 pm (UTC)Jason is still a victim of a seriously traumatic event. Looking at it this way: when Barbara was shot and heard that Bruce was standing and laughing with her perpetrator, she was angry at him (Oracle: Year One) and justifiably so based on the version of events that she had. Whether you like the Killing Joke or not, it happened and Bruce may have stood there laughing with the Joker -- the guy who had only recently shot her in the spine, degraded her and degraded her father. Would you expect her, as a victim of crime, to just be like: "Well, at least I survived!" and not express anger and resentment at the situation?
But I mean if we want to put it in terms of reality, the best case example is to see Jason as a victim of a seriously traumatic event, such as aggravated sexual assault/assault/attempted murder. And in some cases, those survivors are angry at more than just the perpetrator: they might be angry at the justice system (which Jason is) in the event that the perpetrator spends no time in jail or that they have to be further re-victimized during the court process; (and thus seeing no "vengeance" or justice for the crimes committed against them) Or at family members/parents/loved ones who they feel sided with the perpetrator (ie. When I covered an inquiry into childhood sexual abuse, in many cases, parents would often think the child was lying if the perpetrator was an authority figure -- that could certainly cause some anger and hostility) Would you say in those cases these victims are "whining and complaining" or perhaps have some justifiable anger?
(And as a sidenote, even though, yes, we as readers know that Batman doesn't side with the Joker, but Jason seems to feel because Batman hasn't done anything about the Joker problem, that he is basically condoning him and allowing more murders to happen.)
It's hard to look at Jason's case based in reality because it's so fantastical, but if you're asking whether I think that Jason's anger is justified, well, I can certainly understand it and sympathize with it; even his anger at Bruce.
And no, I don't think Jason should be jumping for joy that he's alive again -- would you expect that of any other fictional (or real) victim of crime? It's kind of like saying, "God, you need to just get over it. At least you are alive. You should be happy about that. Stop your whining and complaining that the justice system is flawed, that your perpetrator went free and continues to harm others. You just need to find a healthier outlet!"
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 06:23 pm (UTC)In real life people sometimes do tell victims of traumatic events etc to 'just get over it', and it's incredibly gross when they do. Of course this is fictional, but still.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 06:27 pm (UTC)(And thanks ^-^ )
no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 02:38 pm (UTC)Saying that his coping method could use some work is totally fair, heh. It's certainly not working, that's for sure.... though at this point he's pretty much exacerbated the situation beyond all reason.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:05 am (UTC)Rather inductive reasoning you've got there!
Please don't be my research partner.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-27 12:28 am (UTC)I LOL'd...
no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:21 am (UTC)I do think that Bruce loves all of his children, I'm not sure I'm entirely convinced he loves them *equally.* Maybe airawyn put it best when she said.... he loves them differently. But I definitely see where Jason is coming from.
Though... I'm not entirely sure about Dick. I mean, given everything that happened in continuity, I could see why Dick isn't a fan of Jason -- but I also see their relationship as being a lot more complex than that. Them both having a relationship prior to Jason's death and Dick feeling guilt over Jason's death (and return, too, probably, in that he hasn't been able to help him, because Dick helps everybody -- he hasn't given up on Damian, he didn't give up on Rose, etc.) So I just... don't think it's quite so simplistic. Maybe Winick really couldn't get into it in-depth in the interview....
But I think a lot of this makes Bruce, Dick and Jason very human -- I know families where the parents love the firstborn the most -- even when that firstborn has done some terrible things (in and out of jail, domestic abuse).
I'm glad Winick has more stories to tell about Jason because I certainly want to keep reading them. When I read his line saying that he couldn't say anything, I immediately thought: what a tease! I desperately want Jason to interact with the female members of the Batfamily: Babs, Steph and Cass. I don't think those relationships would be simplistic, either, and I really, really, really, really want to see him talk to Barbara. Can I stress that enough? Really, really, really, really, really, really, reaaaaaaaally want to see this happen. (I think it might be time to send in another letter to DC about this.... hahah)
And there's others I'd like to see him interact with, Alfred, Talia again, and Mia Dearden, definitely. I'd like for Mia to call him out on his bullshit and, given everything that's happened to her post-C4J (with her claiming Ollie's an enlightened hypocrite when he stopped her from killing the Electrocutioner) and at least get her to admit that, yeah, she does understand what he's talking about (since Arrows do have a different sense of morality than Bats, moreso Mia and Roy than, say, Connor) And that I think they are.... the only two (? I can't think of any others off the top of my head) street kids turned sidekicks, they have this sort of bond of understanding (plus Ollie's abandonment of her post C4J....) and that she doesn't represent the Bat and is therefore not *one of them* in Jason's eyes.
Whoops, this comment is way longer than I intended it to be, haha
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:28 am (UTC)Wait, is this some widely known thing where firstborns in particular tend to be favoured? Because most of the 'favourite' kids I know are younger siblings.
I still don't really feel that there's much evidence that Bruce loved Dick any more than Jason, at least pre-resurrection. He did the insta-adoption/guardianship thing with both of them, which while creepy, speaks to pretty strong feelings on his part. He lunged wildly at Joker with a machine gun in ADITF and did have serious intentions to kill him.
And - and - Jason is the plucky street kid who made Batman laugh in Crime Alley at his sheer audacity! Dude, come on now, that is powerful. But I absolutely believe that Jason might think it's true because he's so out of the loop, and also seems to have seriously distorted emotional thinking on that front - which I think might be because he's projecting his mother's betrayal onto the world somehow.
And on a personal level, I just don't get someone liking Dick more than Jason - although I heard it *can* happen... :P
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:10 pm (UTC)Why do you think Jan Brady gets so jealous about Marcia? xD MARCIA MARCIA MARCIA
And hey, I only said I wasn't *entirely* convinced Bruce doesn't love his sons equally --- I can be persuaded! ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:46 pm (UTC)If Dick is the favourite, surely it would be because of his (vastly overrated) tendencies towards chirpiness and er, not being murderously bitter and angry all the time? :P
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 07:57 pm (UTC)They are also the ones that become the first focus of the parents attention and unlike later kids, where the attention has to be shared, they get it ALL probably for longer than any kids further down the line
In families with titles or a heritage, the eldest was traditionally also the one who would inherit and received the necessary training to do so.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:26 pm (UTC)Dick is the one he had the highest expectations of because he was the one he worried about most. The fact that Dick managed to exceed those expectations is down to him.
Bruce relaxed a little more with Jason, because after the first one, the rest would be easy, right?
Tim, well, he came pre-raised to an extent the others did.
In some senses, Dick is the one Bruce put the most work into and thus might be proudest of, in his heart of hearts.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 09:02 pm (UTC)It's hard to judge Bruce's relationship with Jason, because it was so tempestuous. Early on he was very jazzed about him in that "I have a new kitten" way, and then of course Jason became very unhappy about something or other (it seemed like something was going wrong way before Gloria) and their relationship deteriorated.
It's sad; Jason was the kid who needed the most from Bruce, but he just didn't seem to realise that at all. That he could just scoop him up off the streets and take him home without anticipating a whole ton of baggage that Dick didn't have is one of the... incompatibly bronze-age elements of Jason's story that just don't make sense in the modern era.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 10:29 pm (UTC)Jason 1.0 was a little vanilla personality-wise, and a little bit much of a Dick-clone in origin, but with his background, he made a certain amount of sense in terms of the Bat-verse of the time, he had the same skills and motivation as Dick and if one glossed over that, he was a competent trainee hero.
Jason 2.0 could have been a great character, and in many ways could be seen as a precursor to Damian. A scrappy, argumentative, overly-aggressive street-fighting Robin that Batman has to rein in rather than teach to fight, and had to deal more with teaching him when NOT to fight. But they seemed to want to have elements of Jason 1.0 still in there and that made an uneven character.
The retcons since his death making him more angsty and more of a street punk haven't helped. Him smoking as Robin being the first on that springs to mind, that just never works for me as an image, it's trying too hard to make him a "bad boy".
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 08:37 pm (UTC)Dick became his ward*, Jason became his son. If anyone had a right to be miffed by the comparison it would surely be Dick, though he really wasn't (because he's a nice guy) and Bruce and he had their discussion about that at Donna's wedding, and cleared the air effectively.
* Various contuity quirks to one side about when Dick became adopted. Zero Hour changed Dick's origin so he was insta-adopted too, but that was more or less instantly ignored in the Gotham Knights story where he's adopted as an adult.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 01:35 am (UTC)The eldest, as icon_uk points out, gets all the attention and is a focus of hopes and dreams, until the youngers come along. He then makes the classic younger sibling complaint that that means the eldest gets more leeway. The classic eldest sibling response would be that, au contraire, they have to obey a very strict set of rules that actually loosen up by the time the youngers come along. Battles all fought as it were. (That was certainly my experience.)
What is often objectively true, is that the eldest spends all their formative years with adults, with no other children around. This tends to make them a) much better at polite and acceptable interaction with adults (since they'll otherwise be banished from social occasions) and b) much more dependent on, and willing to seek, adult approval. Youngers get their company and approval elsewhere. I think that's Dick down to the ground.
What you identify as 'favourite' staus for the youngest is more likely, imho, to be what I would call 'indulged' status. They seem to get away with more (whether because parental/societal attitudes really have changed, eg I used to get a hiding with a wooden spoon, my youngest sibling got time-out; or because parents are now exhausted/time-poor, eg my mother was divorced and raising four kids on a single income, rather than married and a stay at home mother to one or two).
Interestingly, though, while I point at the youngest and cry foul, and she points at me and cries foul even louder, neither of us ever point at the unfortunate two in between. And they point at both of us! I think we have to examine Jason as a classic 'middle child', not as the youngest. From his perspective, he's neither perfect like Dick nor indulged like Tim. I find it pretty funny that Tim then experiences that same displacement vis a vis Damian. And reacts to it in the classic manner.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 07:49 am (UTC)What you identify as 'favourite' staus for the youngest is more likely, imho, to be what I would call 'indulged' status. They seem to get away with more (whether because parental/societal attitudes really have changed, eg I used to get a hiding with a wooden spoon, my youngest sibling got time-out; or because parents are now exhausted/time-poor, eg my mother was divorced and raising four kids on a single income, rather than married and a stay at home mother to one or two).
As a youngest child (ok, only youngest of two, which changes things considerably), I resent your implication that eldest sibling favouritism is somehow genuine while younger siblings are only "indulged!" :P In my experience personality has a far larger effect on filial relationships than birth order; my sister was my mother's clear favourite because she was very similar to her in personality. I have to wonder if this in part a self-fulfilling prophecy though, as my mother was the eldest sibling of two girls and seemed to project a LOT of her relationship with her younger sister on to me and my sister. My mother identified with my older sister, and because of that she was far more indulged than I.
I think I was my father's favourite because I guess he thought of me as more like him? But he didn't have a whole lot to do with us while we were growing up, besides sort of glowering in the background and complaining if we left stray Lego pieces around. I think not having him around during my adolescence might be the real reason I felt less pressure to be "perfect" than my sister did in her early teens. He was certainly an obsessive perfectionist, and I think my mother worried us girls over that in order to please him.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 10:35 am (UTC)He lunged wildly at Joker with a machine gun in ADITF and did have serious intentions to kill him.
And that lasted after that, as well. Knightfall and Scarecrow using fear gas on Batman, making him see Jason get killed, come to mind.
or:
Plus, come on, they were FATED TO MEET.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 11:59 am (UTC)One is from the POV of the, to at least some extent, unbalanced Jason Todd (Who is also shouting complete and other rubbish about Bruce somehow letting a kid he'd never met find out about his ID, when Tim didn't deduce that Batman was Bruce Wayne, he deduced that ROBIN was Dick Grayson and worked out from that.) and the other POV is that of Neron, a liar and manipulator.
Have to say though, that I thought that Bruce turning down the chance to revive Jason was a singularly powerful and affecting moment, he DOES want his son back, but Neron was obviously not to be trusted and the "Monkey's Paw" scenario might well apply. (and that bit about the sound at the end still gives me chills, that's some effective horror there)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 12:29 pm (UTC)The second is that Neron thought that Bruce would be more likely to try and revive Jason than, say, his parents.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 12:50 pm (UTC)The Neron one is interesting in that regard, perhaps with more layers to it; If the Waynes came back, would Bruce stop being Batman? If Jason came back, Bruce would probably continue, except now he'd be Neron's pawn, which would gain Neron more one wonders..?
( * Honestly, I have much the same reaction to the "Bat-Family-analysis" tapes in the Gotham Knights story arc that we eventually find out are made by Bruce Wayne, particularly the one where he waxes rhapsodic about the young Dick Grayson, and how he's "full of grace", which is a very odd choice of words IMHO, it just seems, somehow I dunno... skeevy.)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 01:01 pm (UTC)About the Neron one, I wondered if perhaps Neron thought Bruce wouldn't be able to even conceive of his parents being alive again. After all, if Bruce's parents had never died, Bruce's life as it is wouldn't exist.
(about the "full of grace": I can see how it can seem skeevy, but given that it's about an aerialist, it never strikes me as such. It's a choice of words that I find right somehow, evocative and describing precisely what I imagine Dick to be like.)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 01:26 pm (UTC)"Full of grace" on the other hand has another, religious, context to me as a Christian, since it's the second line of the "Hail Mary", the primary prayer of worship to the Blessed Virgin.
"Hail Mary,
Full of Grace,
The Lord is with Thee... etc"
In a religious context, "Grace" doesn't mean "elegance of movement", it means "a spontaneous, unmerited gift of divine favour from God". Whilst this, in certain ways might describe the effect Dick had on Bruce, I'm not sure it's best articulated like that, least of all by Bruce himself!
As for the Neron bit, it didn't seem to stop Ra's Al Ghul from tyring it, but I never remotely liked that concept. The Lazarus Pit could revive the NEWLY dead, up until that moment in "Tower of Babel" I don't think there was ever a hint that it could revive the LONG dead.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-14 01:39 pm (UTC)up until that moment in "Tower of Babel" I don't think there was ever a hint that it could revive the LONG dead
And since that nothing happens in Tower of Babel, there's still no hint. Just a plot of Ra's to divert Bruce's attention and Bruce not wanting to take the risk of seeing his parents as zombies.
THAT IS A GIANT STONE PENIS WITH A MAN'S FACE ON IT
Date: 2011-04-11 09:17 am (UTC)Re: THAT IS A GIANT STONE PENIS WITH A MAN'S FACE ON IT
Date: 2011-04-11 10:18 am (UTC)Yeah, that actually surprised me too
Re: THAT IS A GIANT STONE PENIS WITH A MAN'S FACE ON IT
Date: 2011-04-11 03:40 pm (UTC)Re: THAT IS A GIANT STONE PENIS WITH A MAN'S FACE ON IT
Date: 2011-04-11 11:53 am (UTC)Re: THAT IS A GIANT STONE PENIS WITH A MAN'S FACE ON IT
Date: 2011-04-11 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:05 pm (UTC)And of coruse, the first/last time they met, Jason blew away a goodly chunk of Damians internal organs with a machine gun, including severing his spinal column. That's the sort of thing that can lead to the bearing of grudges.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:10 pm (UTC)But your first point makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:58 pm (UTC)Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 04:05 pm (UTC)Metaphorically, of course ^_^
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:46 pm (UTC)Incidentally, Damian was shot by Flamingo, not Jason ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 10:03 pm (UTC)but UGH YOU WIN THIS ROUND WINICK, that was actually pretty good I guess.
...with the usual caveat that the reason Batman doesn't kill the Joker is he knows the Joker would just come back, probably with superstrength, or maybe vampire powers.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 04:58 am (UTC)And that's a good thing.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-12 10:00 pm (UTC)