Marvel "Vengeance" interview
May. 24th, 2011 07:29 amWhat happens when you get to play with the toys and try to go with EPIC, while still holding true (but not following) continuity. We get to find out.
Aint It Cool News has the interview with Joe Casey and Tom Brennan about their upcoming Marvel project "Vengeance".
From the article:
MATT ADLER (MA): To begin, how would you sum up the central premise of VENGEANCE?
JOE CASEY (JC): Funny you should ask that, because I’ve been angling to do a mainstream Marvel book that really had no “central premise” for a change. I think superhero comic books get too caught up in all that literary shit. Do you think Stan and Jack and Steve were sitting around thinking about “central premises” in 1962? Hell, no! They were just thinking up cool shit and putting it out. Well, that’s exactly what we’re doing. Make mine Marvel!
MA: How was the idea for the series developed?
JC: Very oddly. It morphed a few times before it got to where it’s at now. Not to mention, a story this big, this sprawling, this epic…it tends to develop even as it’s moving along. There’s a bit in issue #2 that I just wrote that I had no idea would be there. But, in the context of this series, it made perfect sense to go that way. I’ll give you a hint… it involves Bullseye and Lady Bullseye and it’s a love scene. And it ain’t a flashback. Can I get an “Awww, yeah!” up in this hothouse?!
Nice to hear creative teams "swinging for the rafters" with odd characters.
And now to overload you with art from the mini-series.
First, the widescreen editions.

I'll pic it up in trades, but I do love the art.
edit: And is it me or is Doom trying out for a Lady Gaga video?
Aint It Cool News has the interview with Joe Casey and Tom Brennan about their upcoming Marvel project "Vengeance".
From the article:
MATT ADLER (MA): To begin, how would you sum up the central premise of VENGEANCE?
JOE CASEY (JC): Funny you should ask that, because I’ve been angling to do a mainstream Marvel book that really had no “central premise” for a change. I think superhero comic books get too caught up in all that literary shit. Do you think Stan and Jack and Steve were sitting around thinking about “central premises” in 1962? Hell, no! They were just thinking up cool shit and putting it out. Well, that’s exactly what we’re doing. Make mine Marvel!
MA: How was the idea for the series developed?
JC: Very oddly. It morphed a few times before it got to where it’s at now. Not to mention, a story this big, this sprawling, this epic…it tends to develop even as it’s moving along. There’s a bit in issue #2 that I just wrote that I had no idea would be there. But, in the context of this series, it made perfect sense to go that way. I’ll give you a hint… it involves Bullseye and Lady Bullseye and it’s a love scene. And it ain’t a flashback. Can I get an “Awww, yeah!” up in this hothouse?!
Nice to hear creative teams "swinging for the rafters" with odd characters.
And now to overload you with art from the mini-series.
First, the widescreen editions.
| | |
I'll pic it up in trades, but I do love the art.
edit: And is it me or is Doom trying out for a Lady Gaga video?

no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:09 pm (UTC)wow, that's a remarkably stupid answer. And there I thought i'd read it and now he makes me rethink it...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:28 pm (UTC)Also, isn't Bullseye dead? Are they making Lady Bullseye a necrophiliac?
Love the design on the Mister Negative-esque guy though. He's like if Mister Negative and Nega-Scott (from Scott Pilgrim) had a baby.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:32 pm (UTC)(And I'm probably getting #1 just for the promised "Magneto breaks up a drug-fueled Beverly Hills party" scene.. there's no way that can't be laid out hilariously.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:46 pm (UTC)"Well, I think this is a serious project that'll really put us on the map. EXCELSIOR!!"
no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 03:55 pm (UTC)It kind of makes me sad that I won't be getting this series, because it sounds like something I'd enjoy, as I typically like Joe Casey's work in mainstream books, but...no, my goal is to whittle the pull list down to nothing not add more soon-to-be-canceled books to it.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 04:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 04:08 pm (UTC)Turns out, Dragotta and I are like brothers from different mothers. It’s been an intense meeting of the minds. We’re having a blast pushing the limits of what a superhero “anti-event” can be. We send each other shit that’s inspired us over the years…the most recent example is me sending him a bunch of images from THRILLER, an early-80’s DC book by Robert Loren Fleming and Trevor Von Eeden (a favorite of mine from when I was pre-pubescent). He’d heard of it, but had never really seen it. The “cinematic storyboard” approach to superheroes -- in the actual comics -- needs to be destroyed once and for all. We’ve got movies for that stuff. Comic books are their own artform but most superhero comics, the bigger sellers in the Direct Market, play it way too safe to be all that interesting to me. Over the past ten years, I feel like I’ve seen it all. Dragotta and I want to come up with something that we haven’t seen at Marvel and it’s great to have a co-conspirator in that regard.
THANK YOU.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 04:09 pm (UTC)I'm imagining a situation where he's using his arms to pummel him like a grade-school bully.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 04:22 pm (UTC)Seriously, though, odd cast.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 06:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 07:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 08:50 pm (UTC)But I'm hesitant because of something Casey revealed in an interview
he did with CBR yesterday
For example: one thing we've decided about the new character, Miss America Chavez, is that she doesn't wear underwear. Believe it or not, that was an important creative decision. I think it says something about her personality that she deliberately goes out into the field sans underwear. You can see it in the art. How's that for selling it?
I'm still not sure what to think about that.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-24 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-25 04:34 am (UTC)