Red Hood and The Outlaws #1
Sep. 21st, 2011 04:23 pmSo, the first issue of Red Hood and The Outlaws was... surprising.
So much so that I'm not sure what I thought of it. At all. It was very much an introductory issue, and as such it focuses mainly on who the three main characters are, and how they relate to each other. What is clear is that Roy, Jason and Kory have all had extensive changes and/or additions made to their back stories. I've posted three pages that I think illustrate this below the cut.
Some of it is good - like Roy and Jason apparently having something like a friendship...

...And some is bad. Kory now cares very little for individual humans, to the extent that she finds them completely forgettable. Seriously, she doesn't remember any of the Titans, even *Dick,* although her relationship with him is still canon. She has also seems to have lost the 'y' from the end of her name and is now called Kori. The writing and art are both extremely male gaze-y when it comes to Kory. She is depicted with a great deal of sexual agency, but the book drips with the assumption that the only people reading this are the 18-35 male bracket. I found it quite insulting.

Ok, so people who were wondering/worrying whether she might 'get with' Roy or Jason?

The obvious is somewhat subverted by the fact that she's done 'em both. Ordinarily I'd have thought that makes her a lucky lady who gets what she wants, but the rest of the book is so objectifying of her that I feel weird about it. There is potentially some interesting points to be made about her attitude to sexuality, but I think they got lost in her primary portrayal as a male fantasy-style 'nymphomaniac' - people spend an awful lot of time leering at, discussing and photographing Kory, managing to make themselves look like enormous douches in the process. Still, at least she's not being held to the usual comic book heroine standard of being sexy but not actually sexual, I guess? :/
As for the main plot (or what's foreshadowed to become the main plot), it's still very mysterious. It relates to Jason's hitherto unmentioned ties to an organisation called the All Caste. A creepy former member named Essence has come to ask for Jason's help with a string of murders connected to stolen organs, and to tell him that a female mentor of his named Ducra has been murdered. No, I have no idea what any of that means yet either.
So much so that I'm not sure what I thought of it. At all. It was very much an introductory issue, and as such it focuses mainly on who the three main characters are, and how they relate to each other. What is clear is that Roy, Jason and Kory have all had extensive changes and/or additions made to their back stories. I've posted three pages that I think illustrate this below the cut.
Some of it is good - like Roy and Jason apparently having something like a friendship...

...And some is bad. Kory now cares very little for individual humans, to the extent that she finds them completely forgettable. Seriously, she doesn't remember any of the Titans, even *Dick,* although her relationship with him is still canon. She has also seems to have lost the 'y' from the end of her name and is now called Kori. The writing and art are both extremely male gaze-y when it comes to Kory. She is depicted with a great deal of sexual agency, but the book drips with the assumption that the only people reading this are the 18-35 male bracket. I found it quite insulting.

Ok, so people who were wondering/worrying whether she might 'get with' Roy or Jason?

The obvious is somewhat subverted by the fact that she's done 'em both. Ordinarily I'd have thought that makes her a lucky lady who gets what she wants, but the rest of the book is so objectifying of her that I feel weird about it. There is potentially some interesting points to be made about her attitude to sexuality, but I think they got lost in her primary portrayal as a male fantasy-style 'nymphomaniac' - people spend an awful lot of time leering at, discussing and photographing Kory, managing to make themselves look like enormous douches in the process. Still, at least she's not being held to the usual comic book heroine standard of being sexy but not actually sexual, I guess? :/
As for the main plot (or what's foreshadowed to become the main plot), it's still very mysterious. It relates to Jason's hitherto unmentioned ties to an organisation called the All Caste. A creepy former member named Essence has come to ask for Jason's help with a string of murders connected to stolen organs, and to tell him that a female mentor of his named Ducra has been murdered. No, I have no idea what any of that means yet either.

no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 03:51 pm (UTC)I was hoping Kory would be just as strong a lead as Roy and Jason. In fact I was hoping that while both of them would be immensely attracted to her...she would be the one they can't have. That not only puts her on equal footing/role definition with her costars,but it also opens the gates for potential love interests outside of the main 3 (which still could happen mind you, it just becomes a tad more predictable).
Playing Starfire as the "LOL IM A HOT SEX LOVIN ALIEN" is such a huge and overused flanderization that I was really hoping it be obvious to Lobdell to avoid it.
Guess not (at least so far).
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 03:59 pm (UTC)Well, that is kind of a cliche' in and of itself, isn't it? I'm certain I've seen that story so many times. I would think her having both of them as booty calls is a little more unique AND allows for more potential love interests.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:01 pm (UTC)It sounds like you understand what my problem is, here. An alternative but equally male-gaze driven story wouldn't exactly solve it.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:53 pm (UTC)If the rest of the book wasn't trying so hard to objectify her (and doing away with 99% of her past while we're at it despite it all apparently still happening) I would be generally interested but this just makes it come across as skeevey.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:58 pm (UTC)Although tbh I am completely depressed about all the slut shaming Kory is going to get for this. :(
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 10:26 pm (UTC)That kind of kills the mood for one, and for two, she might realize being the 'hot chick' between two guys might spell trouble for the team dynamic? though I don't know what her overall relationship is with the outlaws so IDK...
I do like the arts.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 11:21 pm (UTC)She's not asking you for sex, so it doesn't matter if you think it kills the mood. I wouldn't mind directneness myself :p
for two, she might realize being the 'hot chick' between two guys might spell trouble for the team dynamic?
Why is she responsible for the team dynamic? If the two guys think this might spell trouble for it; why don't they just say "no" to the offer of sex? It's not a problem for her, obviously.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 03:59 pm (UTC)And I personally dislike the idea of both of them drooling over the unattainable Kory - I think if anything that's a more cliché story, which again is actually very male-perspective driven.
The hot-girl-you-can't-have is the kind of dude story that gets told over and over. I have to say I actually have no problem with Kory bagging both guys, I just wish it was told from her perspective and that we got to hear more about *her* attraction to *them.*
But the actual experiential part of female sexuality is very unpopular and uncomfortable to comic writers, it seems.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:16 pm (UTC)I think your saying that the perspective, empowerment, and sexual fulfillment (are these the correct words?) is for the most part here, being told from the guys POV , when it could be equally distributed among the cast (after all SHE'S sleeping with them too); and that the problem is Kory beating treated as the sexual object, as opposed to being a PERSON engaging in sex with other people?
Which if done right, is a more mature and different form of displaying relationships. I just have no faith in most comic book writers to do it correctly lol (even the talented ones).
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:20 pm (UTC)We see a lot of Roy's/Jason's/random little boy's desire for *her* - we don't get the chance to see through her eyes and experience any of the reciprocal attraction she obviously feels back.
Presumably because that might make a *man8 the object of desire, which would of course be totally gay. :/
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:35 pm (UTC)again. i have faith in Lobdell... there is more potenital for good here than for bad.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:01 am (UTC)Old Kory perhaps, but I didn't even get that from this story's new Kori. She takes no initiative at all that I could tell in combat. She follows Jason's orders and that's it, even if she'd said something like "I see tanks up ahead. Do you think I should melt them or explode them?" I'd have felt some sense of self motivation, instead she only even acknowledges the tanks because Jason asks her to destroy them.
And her weird new memory, and inability to tell humans apart (even Roy and Jason) surely bodes ill for her contributions on a tactical level, when as a trained warrior there should be more to her than being a good soldier.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 03:51 pm (UTC)Well, that's one more mark in the return policy's favor.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:13 pm (UTC)I look at it this way, I can't stand Roy or Jason anyway, and this new Kory isn't a character I have any interest in. So as long as they're all stuck in this bag of shite, I don't have to see any of them.
Though, I'm fairly sure this book will fail quite dramatically, and they'll all end up shoehorned into Nightwing or Teen Titans.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 03:52 pm (UTC)Ughh... I miss the New Titans Starfire...
At least, Jason & Roy's friendship kinda fun it seems...right?...right?...
*goes back reading the old couple of Arsenal issues* I miss Lian :(
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:09 pm (UTC)Oh, and you stay classy, DC.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 03:53 pm (UTC)I think there's more to it than that. From what Lobdell has said about Starfire's relationship with Dick, it sounds like they had a really rotten break-up. My guess is that it caused the "group" to fall apart in the process, and Kory remembers it all, but refuses to talk about it.
Also, I'm SO GLAD they're mixing up Jason's past with stuff like the All Castle. I personally found Lost Days to be really boring and an overall crap origin story for Red Hood.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:04 pm (UTC)Hmm, that's interesting! I could actually totally buy that Kory is faking it to avoid uncomfortable conversations, if it weren't for the fact that on one page she thinks about how she likes spending time with Roy and Jason, it's just a pity she has such a hard time remembering which is which....
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:13 pm (UTC)Well, in that case, maybe she'll adapt to the human method of memory as well? Or maybe she did in the past with them and closed it up because the break-up memories were painful? Granted, I'm doing the same theorizing again, but hey, I like doing that kinda stuff.
I'm just saying, if Lobdell was able to combine the 90s Superboy and the YJ Superboy into one cohesive character, he can do the same for Starfire here.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 10:41 pm (UTC)I have a suspicion that the organ thieves may have done something to Kory's mind. A possible alien connection was definitely mentioned.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:01 pm (UTC)I only made it halfway through that last page.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:03 pm (UTC)Apropos of very little, "Kori" would technically be more accurate since her name is Koriand'r, the "y" was more for ease of humans reading it, though Kory Anders was her assumed name on Earth.
I agree that making her more alien and, as an example, having her ability to remember things being different from the human approach is an interesting way to go, but in the same way that making Jack Harkness omnisexual is an interesting idea; It's not the concept that's poor, it's the execution.
Based on this, I can't really imagine this Kori and Dick actually HAVING a relationship (Sex, perhaps, but a long term living together relationship.. not really), nor her having the same impact on his life and worldview that she did.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:15 pm (UTC)The main plot involves organs being stolen from people without cuts or surgery, while they're still alive. Is it possible that Kory's memory was also stolen?
Lobdell also mentions Kori's joyous nature in interviews, and that wasn't very obvious here. she didn't even seem like she enjoyed the *sex,* she just seemed to have some sullen voracious commitment to having as much of it as possible.
I think something is supposed to be wrong with her.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:29 pm (UTC)i think there is somethign wrong with all of them.
part of the coming plot seems to involve them facing thier pasts.
i still have faith in Lobdell, perhaps this portrayal is SUPPOSED to make us feel like something is off...
i mean like you said, its good enough and "on" enough that we don't hate it... but off enough so that we just feel... well we don't know how to feel actually....
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 11:18 pm (UTC)Or maybe I'm just being hopeful, because I've always loved Kori and I don't want to see her character massacred like this.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:07 am (UTC)If she is suffering from some strange form of externally caused amnesia/brain bending then it seems a singularly poor approach to use in a story that introduces her and sets up the scenario, because like it or not, this IS her "First Impression" moment, which will colour future perception of her for new readers.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:26 pm (UTC)its a little bothersome the Cheese cakey ness of the Kori art... but at the same time... Kory has never been a shy one (but at the same time again, this is from mostly male writers....so im... confused as to how i should feel) I would feel a lot more comfortable if there was more male semmi nudity (at least that way it would feel more balanced, i mean there was roy... but why not jason too he's a pasty Gotham boy, he needs sun)
i don't really have an issue with her sexuality. i don't see her as a nymphomaniac at all here. i see her as a woman who knows what she wants and goes for it. i don't see her CRAVING sex i see her saying "You are attractive, I am attractive, we are on a tropical island. what more do you need? If you want to, fine if not, its your loss"
like you said, she keeps her sexual agency.
i guess the real issue i have is her... flippancy towards her past human relationships... however, even there, i feel like it could be her "lying to her self" Kory has had a hard life, but she knows things in life are only temporary. maybe when she split with the Titans she didn't WANT to remember them. if that makes any sense. I think in reality she does remember them and does care for them, but won't allow herself to think about things that are in the past....
i didn't dislike this enough to not read it... it seems to have more potential than faults... so i will give it another issue or two....
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:33 pm (UTC)It's the blatant objectification that I found disturbing, not the sex itself. I was also really creeped out by the memory loss, and the way that Roy didn't seem at all bothered by that even though he (presumably?) used to work with her.
i guess the real issue i have is her... flippancy towards her past human relationships... however, even there, i feel like it could be her "lying to her self" Kory has had a hard life, but she knows things in life are only temporary. maybe when she split with the Titans she didn't WANT to remember them. if that makes any sense. I think in reality she does remember them and does care for them, but won't allow herself to think about things that are in the past....
I am actually beginning to wonder if Kory's mind has been 'tampered' with by some outside force, and whether this will become a plot point soon. Her disconnectedness is quite disturbing,and doesn't hold true to what Lobdell said about her being a fundamentally joyous person, imo.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:40 pm (UTC)exactly.
also as far as the objectification.. some how (and i know its gonna sound like i am making excuses for the writer, maybe its because so far this seems very unllike what i know of him) maybe its SUPPOSED to bother us... i mean Kory has never been shy about showing her body, but those weren't just "Funny remarks" they were, jarring and troublesome....
again it feels like Lobdell is trying to show us that there is something very off and wrong with the situation, not just Kory.
again maybe i am reaching, but as a writer... i tend to look beneath what is written on the page to what is trying to be conveyed.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:49 pm (UTC)Then again I've not read this book yet and I've never read anything with Kory in before, so I'll post a more informed opinion once I've read this.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:00 pm (UTC)the second one is that if she decides that it might be problematic to thier working relationship, and she see's that Roy is attracted to her, she might think, "Look, you think i'm hot, you're not too bad yourself, lets get this out of the way before we get back to work and this becomes an issue"
also yeah i think she finds them both attractive (they are both lithe sexy red heads, who would NOT be attracted to that:)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:43 pm (UTC)Well, Jason's dyed his hair back to black again, which I think kinda blows. I think Morrison said it best--gingers need their heroes too. Ron Weasley isn't enough. XD
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:00 pm (UTC)Understandably, Roy and Jason are both attractive guys, they're comic book characters, they have perfect physiques, but they're not nearly sexually objectified as Kori is being made out to be.
I was just throwing the idea out there that Kori's approach to this might be something akin to "There, it happened, now you don't have to waste time on distractions like fantasising about me." Like I said, I've not read this book yet and I'll come back with a more informed decision once I have.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:03 pm (UTC)Yes, I noticed. >:(
You're getting it all backwards, comic - all backwards! *shakes fist*
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:41 pm (UTC)The way the dialogue reads, it makes me think that Roy knew a lot of the Titans, but wasn't a big member of the group. He may have met Starfire in passing, or more likely heard about her.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:10 am (UTC)But they certainly did meet, and Roy even made a light hearted pass at her before going too far with his comments, and she basically threw him out the door and into a wall.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:28 am (UTC)"Red Hood, Arsenal and Starfire enter the Chamber of All to discover what the Untitled wanted – but they’ll need to leave their most cherished memories as collateral! And when you’re a reincarnated sidekick who lets your madon get the better of you, a former addict turned soldier of fortune, and an intergalactic princess who never quite recovered from a childhood spent as a prisoner of war…? Well, there aren’t a lot of cherished memories to choose from! All this as the trio draws ever closer to dealing with a threat that’s already killed the ancient caste of assassins who taught Jason Todd everything he knows about the art of killing!"
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:34 pm (UTC)well, more money for me!
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:38 pm (UTC)the entire issue felt like being dropped in the deep end, to me. I'm not sure I have enough of a clue about what's going on to judge it.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:39 pm (UTC)Hm. The art objectifies her, it's true, but I'm trying to imagine if the art was different, would Kori come off as male fantasy as she does here? Art can make a world of difference- a perfectly strong sexually positive female character can turn into male fantasy character in 1, 2, 3.
Actions wise, I'm not bothered by anything she does. The whole 'Tamaraneans see humans as sights/smells/don't reallyc are about them' is probably just her fucking around with them because she's mad about the breakup, and if not, I'd actually be rather interested in seeing how that goes. It would be very much an 'alien' characteristic.
*sigh* Well, it's the first issue, let's see how this goes.
Also, if Kori has already slept with both, then that means only Jason and Roy have to sleep together to make my OTP come true! MUAHAHAHA
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:41 pm (UTC)what makes you think they haven't :)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:43 pm (UTC)Thanks for your comment. All the disgust was... starting to disgust me. I hate how visceral people get in their reactions to female sexuality, even if it is problematic.
I don't know if I made it clear, but the art was a *big* part of my problem, although there was a lot of objectification embedded in the text too, and it came from everyone - not just Jason and Roy.
I feel like Lobdell really messed up here. He could have written Kory acting in the exact same way and made it 100% less skeevy is he hadn't been so committed to turning her into a fan service figure.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:59 pm (UTC)Yeah, people have been getting really nasty. 'Kory has sex a lot, but only when she's in love with them!!!! She's not a slut who has sex with people she doesn't know well or doesn't care about!!!!' and such and such. It's like, uh, no, guys, she's a rather sexually open character.
"I don't know if I made it clear, but the art was a *big* part of my problem, although there was a lot of objectification embedded in the text too, and it came from everyone - not just Jason and Roy."
Ugh, yeah, the art really is pretty disgusting in portraying her. Hopefully, it will get better, or we'll get a new artist, or something.
And, ugh, there was objectification in the text? Ugh, wonderful.
*sigh* Nonetheless, I won't drop this unless this continues for the next few issues. I KNOW the writer can write women well and write other people treating them well, so this will hopefully improve.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:30 pm (UTC)which is the main reason I am not dropping this book yet. if we are supposed to take the surface as is... its far beneath Lobdell as a writer...
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:17 pm (UTC)All in all, I think it might have been better to retcon away the Dick/Kory relationship altogether. If it was just casual in this new DCnU that kinda ruins the whole point of it. And if it wasn't - and especially if Kory's memory is out of whack and both Roy/Jason are aware of it - then it makes the two men not look too "heroic" (well again with Roy at least - if Lobdell is following Winick's Lost Days then Jason might get a kick out of sleeping with his brother's ex).
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:21 pm (UTC)I must have missed the memo about how two friends having casual, consensual sex is a sign of disrespect.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:40 pm (UTC)And the person I saw on tumblr wasn't talking about how Jason wouldn't brag about a woman like a trophy, they were talking about how Jason would never have casual no strings attached sex with a woman. :/
Because, you know, casual sex is a terrible thing to have with a woman because they are precious delicate flowers.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:15 am (UTC)Given that, AFAIK, up until this issue we had only one confirmed sexual partner for Jason in his entire life and that was TALIA, I'm not sure we had a lot of evidence either way.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:16 pm (UTC)I have no problem at all with not liking this character change cause it IS a huge one but when you're actually losing terms like 'she's giving it away' and 'she used to be better than this' and that's your whole huge issue, that she's 'one of those girls' now, then it starts to bother me, because it seems like you really dislike it because she's having sex for the 'wrong' reasons, not that it's very male gaze-y, you know?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:24 pm (UTC)I think fandom needs to understand that: Sexual objectification = bad, but female character taking control of her sexuality = good. Because they don't seem to get it.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:16 pm (UTC)Yeah, I expect that a lot of the fanboy messageboards are full of that shit and that's why I'm going to avoid it.
I remember the same thing happened during the Dark Avengers run when Moonstone nailed two (maybe four?) of the guys on the team. I saw her get called a slut and a whore and was like "really?" Granted Bendis didn't help matters in his writing but sadly such misogyny and attitudes towards female sexuality isn't very uncommon among geek culture.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:12 pm (UTC)But of course! They believe girls should be mega hot and unattainable, always posing in skimpy outfits with her ass and bust out, and should ONLY sleep with the character the dudebros identify with most and ONLY at the end of the series.
God forbid a woman actually sleep with more than one dude, as well as being the person to initiate it! Or saying she wants nothing to do with love. Then she's a slut! :/
Urghhhh this is why I don't go on comic anythings except for scans_daily.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:17 pm (UTC)This this THIS.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:42 pm (UTC)That annoys me too--especially when it's folks who try to make themselves as liberal and sex-positive.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:16 pm (UTC)Ugh, yes, that's what surprised me- and yet, also didn't surprise me- about the fan reaction to this. I had to unfollow two people on tumblr, the stuff they were saying was THAT bad. Stuff like 'They made her a whore! The only thing worse if they had an- ugh- threesome!' People who posted stuff on how slut-shaming was bad *two days* ago were saying this, I'm serious.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:38 pm (UTC)JASON: What?
STARFIRE: Put your pale human bodies together and make out for me. *grin*
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 12:28 pm (UTC)Absolutely, though I find that happens A LOT with Kory. I think it's also the subservience (ie. "Jason, is there anything else I can do?") along with the objectifying art that raises my squick factor really high. All this does is tell me that the only reason she's in this book is to be a sexual object.
And I really think a male audience is not the audience you want to go for when writing a book that includes Jason, Roy and Kory. I know that Jason has a big female fanbase.
I think the fanservice-y aspects of Kory have always raised my warning bells. If the writer doesn't change what he's doing, then he shouldn't be writing her. I really hope he does start to flesh out her character much more (um... pun actually not intended...)
This does bother me because I want this book to do well. But as of right now, I wish Kory *wasn't* in the book. :/
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 05:26 pm (UTC)Though, to be honest, as I said before, I've always had a problem with some of the more problematic aspects about Kory and how fanservice-y aspects of her have been portrayed. (I recall reading something where she went into Dick's room to wait for him and it was written as very male fantasy/gaze-y)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 06:08 pm (UTC)I think a lot of us came to see those things as central to her character with the fan-service being an unfortunate superficial thing. (And watching things like Teen Titans Go validated that idea.) But apparently to some, especially male writers, it's actually the sex fantasy that's the backbone of her character. Or the total sum of her character!
no subject
Date: 2011-09-24 02:39 am (UTC)Oh, thank you -- that's exactly what was irritating me, but I hadn't quite articulated it. OK, yes: Ick.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:53 pm (UTC)just saying ;D
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:07 pm (UTC)yeah YMMV on that subject, i though the reactions of the people (that one cop) around babs was more... farcical than anything babs was thinking i think she had legitimate fears (again YMMV)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:51 pm (UTC)What is the point you're making?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:51 pm (UTC)that aside, she had problems with the issue, most of us did, but not everyone up and up hated it... we feel... confused is what it is...
(im actually anxious for the other books to be postd, i hear wonder woman was excellent)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:46 pm (UTC)And by "assume," I mean, "hope and pray."
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:11 pm (UTC)Lobdell clearly stated that No story is ever a clean slate. unless you start a story from a character's birth all characters are going to have history and back story. that is part of the story telling process. in fact that is a major factor of THIS story. ALL three characters have a past. Kori, Jason and Roy all have past histy not only with each other but with themselves. and them facing thier past is going to be part of this first arc as well..
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:23 pm (UTC)But in this first issue that is supposed to establish the characters Jason and Roy both have their personalities established right off the bat, where as if the theory holds true everything we see about Kori here is a lie and the new readers don't have anything to judge this on and it will seem like an ass pull. A character's personality being changed should not be the first plot point in something that is meant to be a jumping on story.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:33 pm (UTC)totally off topic, but when i see your name i think Whitey's Amore.... even though i know its White Sycamore :D my eyes are not as young as they used to be :D
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:07 pm (UTC)On the other, it seems so...fanboy-servicy and crude.
I don't know how I should feel about this.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:37 pm (UTC)its like my thoughts on Ed Benes' art. I LOVED his art. But the cheese cakey ness of it was really annoying sometimes... I think as a writer Gail Simone reigned him in a bit and balanced it a bit (i mean have you seen the men he draws? he draws PRETTY men:)
i like Rocafort's art conceptually, its the unbalanced-ness (god i am just using horrible grammar today) of the cheese cake and the over use of it
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:42 pm (UTC)Rocafort's much the same, in his own way, and whilst we do have a shirtless Roy for the ladies, it's... Not quite the same, I imagine, especially when on the same page, we have that full-back shot of Kory in the water that may as well have an arrow pointing at saying 'LOOK AT THE BUTT!!!'.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:55 pm (UTC)Although I am sort of digging shirtless-Roy's tacky scorpion tattoos. Definitely hitting my kink for trashy guys, there, although I'm sure it wasn't intended to.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:10 pm (UTC)But there's something about the execution... Maybe if they're just casually hanging out instead of posing around half-naked on a tropical beach? I'm not sure...
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:42 pm (UTC)Maybe that was the name of the random guy Kory fell in love with for like an issue of New Teen Titans who was a former member of HIVE and died?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:59 pm (UTC)Dustin must be a retcon implant - or maybe Dustin Nguyen :-)
T-minus 6 days until New Teen Titans: Games is released (9/27/2011)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 07:40 pm (UTC)Games was at your LCS??? Oh man! Amazon has it coming in next week and I'm homebound at the moment so I didn't even try to get it. Thanks for letting me know.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 08:52 pm (UTC)BTW, and more importantly, HOW IS IT???
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 09:14 pm (UTC)Plus, the art is so very, very pretty. :-)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:11 pm (UTC)I'm with the others holding out hope that this was intended to read as "off" and will be a plot point later, if only because the alternative is just awful.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:20 pm (UTC)The Super family's physiology seems very different.
And here we have Starfire acting in a way that is radically different than her prior self to sort of show a detachment from humanity as a whole? Kori's view of sexuality isn't odd in itself but it IS pretty weird given the whole New Teen Titans days still seem to be in continuity (short of Roy having had a kid apparently) unless as folks have mentioned above Kori might just be faking her attitude to get over breaking up with Dick.
And it's even more odd to think of how she'd be a member of the Titans if she can't member things or doesn't care to. :/
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:07 pm (UTC)I mean, that would make for a hell of a title to entice someone in. "They Stole Starfire's Brain!"
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:36 pm (UTC)I suppose it will be easy enough for another writer to explain this away somehow or just ignore it, but still...UGH.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 05:45 pm (UTC)Ooh. She's pregnant with Mar'i and Tamaraneans brains shutdown partially during pregnanacy thus she has amnesia. ....i dunno.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:41 pm (UTC)maybe Lian will now be half Tamaranean too...
Half sisters, yay!
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:48 pm (UTC)(Yes, folks that would be impossible - once pregnant, you can't conceive another pregnancy - but you can have litters with more than one sire and people do breed litters that way especially now that the market is soft and you don't want extra puppies or kitties...)
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:29 pm (UTC)(tho I will say, any cheesecake with Kori is aight by me, each "New 52" preview gives me info on whether or not to pay attention to a new title or not. This is a NOT).
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 07:49 pm (UTC)And those legging/boots? At least the Perez design had flat soles and functioned as greaves.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:08 pm (UTC)I'm sorry, but I *love* Kory's character. I enjoyed her enough in the Titans cartoon that it got me to actually go find the Wolfman/Perez era "New Teen Titans" run to learn more about her, which is what got me started in the DCU. (Yes, the Timmverse helped, but it was Toon!Starfire that actually got me to get off my butt and start reading the original comics.) I loved what I saw so much that I've read *everything* with her in it that I've been able to get my hands on, even when it was something that's a genre I don't usually enjoy. (I'm not a big fan of "cosmic" hero books, but when Kory joined the REBELS, I started reading their book.) Hell, I loved the character and lore enough that I made my primary character on DCU Online be a Tamaranean girl (even though Barb's younger, gayer--literally--snarkier, and has a very different background), because I thought it would provide excellent opportunities for roleplaying amongst the players who know their DC lore.
This... OK, if I were to post what I *really* think of this, I'd almost certainly get in trouble with the mods, because it's got me hot enough about things that if you put a teakettle and steam turbine over me right now, you could probably power the entire Eastern Seaboard.
But the key points that I *can* post without getting into trouble are these:
1) KORY IS NOT AN IDIOT. She was rather naive about humans when she first came to Earth, true, but that's no different from, for example, someone who's lived her whole life in St. Louis suddenly being dropped into the middle of rural China. She was someplace new, where she didn't know the cultural rules, and as a result, she was something of a fish out of water. That doesn't make her STUPID.
2) KORY IS NOT A SLUT. And I hope using the term to refer to this mode isn't seen as slut-shaming; in my mind, there's a difference between a woman who is strongly sex-positive and sees a distinct separation between love and sex, and this sort of near-nymphomaniacal have-sex-with-everyone-you-meet-because-y
3) KORY STAYS ON EARTH BECAUSE EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING SHE CARES ABOUT IS HERE. The only member of her family still alive is Komand'r, who she doesn't dare attempt to reconcile with, and with the destruction of the original Tamaran (which is apparently still in continuity), any places she has a sentimental or nostalgic "I miss my home" feel for are gone, too. If she didn't care about people and things here on Earth, she'd have gone to Rann, or Thanagar, or Okaara, or any one of the other worlds in the DCU where she could have found people she might (if we accept that idiotic "don't see humans as people" thing) actually see as people and be able to remember. The ONLY reason she left Earth and joined the REBELS was because her most recent breakup with Dick combined with seeing him wearing Batman's costume and becoming more dark as a result were too painful for her to be able to stay on Earth, where she might see or hear about him on occasion.
In short: KORY IS NOT A BRAINLESS FUCKTOY WITH NO EMPATHY OR ABILITY TO RELATE TO HUMANS. WHATEVER THIS REALDOLL YOU'VE SPRAY-PAINTED ORANGE IS, IT IS NOT STARFIRE!
Scott Lobdell, Dankor, Jim Lee, Bob Harras, and everyone else in editorial who approved this huge steaming pile of shit? I have just one thing to say to you:
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:27 pm (UTC)Yes, that is slut shaming. There is not a threshhold of sluttiness that a woman can pass, at which point it's OK to turn into a raving misogynist.
And having sex with two men hardly means she'll sleep with "anything with two legs," not that it would matter if she did. If a male character had sex with two female heroines that are canonically highly attractive - even if he didn't love them - I doubt you'd start talking about his total lack of standards.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:35 pm (UTC)Of course, if I were writing that scene, Hal'd get a boxing-glove arrow to the mouth and a 'you're damn lucky I'm not talking to the wife that much these days, Jordan,' from Ollie.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:47 pm (UTC)And if that male character were depicted as not seeing women as people, just "sights and smells" that he could get his rocks off on, and was sleeping his way through the book to satisfy his urges when he can't even remember which one is Jane and which one is Rhonda, when in the past he was depicted as sex-positive and interested in friends-with-benefits relationships with women he cared about as friends? Yeah, then I'd start complaining, too.
I don't know. Maybe being a bisexual white male disqualifies me from having an opinion, maybe it's just that I'm not good at explaining my way of thinking, particularly when something has me enraged like this does, but I'm starting to wonder if it's even worth commenting on things that infuriate me any more.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:59 pm (UTC)I did note what you said, I just disagreed with it. I still do.
And fyi, sex addiction does not make someone a slut either.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 08:41 pm (UTC)Also, how is sleeping with two men 'near-compulsive "I can, so therefore I must" sex'? Even if she did, what the fuck is wrong with that? NOTHING. As long as both parties consensual adults, it's cool.
Also, no one is a slut. Slut is a deragatory word people use on women (or men, although it doesn't have the same connotations) as a gendered slur. You can't 'be' a slut, you can only be called it. Why? Because it's not like being called 'evil' because people can actually 'cross the line' to become evil, like drowning puppies and setting kittens on fire. Women who have had sex and women who have never have sex are called it, making it not a word to describe a person's personality, but a slur.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:44 pm (UTC)And 2: "And if that male character were depicted as not seeing women as people, just "sights and smells" that he could get his rocks off on, and was sleeping his way through the book to satisfy his urges when he can't even remember which one is Jane and which one is Rhonda, when in the past he was depicted as sex-positive and interested in friends-with-benefits relationships with women he cared about as friends? Yeah, then I'd start complaining, too." - it's not quite as simple as that. Kory doesn't have difficulty telling them apart because she just doesn't give a fuck about them, it's because her mind literally isn't equipped to do so unless they're both right in front of her. However, she did say elsewhere in the book that she likes them and they maker her laugh, which suggests that their personalities are important to her. So on what basis can you argue that this is NOT a fwb relationship with two men she cares about as friends, as much as she has the capacity to given her perceptual drawbacks?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 09:53 pm (UTC)I'm not gonna go off on the sort of rant I could, because I literally couldn't sleep last night because this had me so pissed off and I don't want to get worked up again about it, and besides, I would definitely be getting in trouble with the mods (again) for commenting on whether "fratboy fantasy" is a term that should be used here...
Instead, just two things. First, a friend of mine told me (and sadly, I don't have any more detail on this, though it seems to jibe with the stuff from CBR and may, in fact, be a corruption of the quotes there) that when it was being discussed on /co/, someone pointed out that Lobdell didn't want Starfire in the book, editorial forced her on him, and his completely gutting the last 30 years of character development to turn her into a walking Penthouse Forum letter ("Dear Penthouse Forum, I never thought something like this could happen to me, but...") was his way of getting revenge on editorial for making him use her. Again, I don't have any verification of this, but if it's true... well, if it's true, I stand by my initial comment to him, because that's just plain wrong.
The second one is simpler, and may help explain my reaction. Let's say the situation's different, and instead of [i]Red Hood and the Outlaws[/i], we got [i]Green Lantern and the Outlaws[/i]. And as part of the reboot, it's now made clear that due to something weird with Hal Jordan's ring, he can't tell humans apart any more, just seeing them as "sights and smells" and nothing more. And then one of his two teammates, Lady Blackhawk, tells the other that she's slept with Hal, shortly before Hal propositions--and has it accepted by--his other teammate, Huntress. Same amount of characterization shown, same level of gratuitous sexualization of Hal's art relative to Zinda and Helena's, just making the change to a DC male who's had more than a few liasons in the past, and two canonically attractive women?
Under those circumstances, would people around here be defending it as a depiction of "a sex-positive male who retains his sexual agency," and an FWB relationship with two women he cares about as friends, as much as he can given his perceptual drawbacks? Or would it be treated as something horrible, because clearly Hal is just using the girls to get his rocks off and therefore it's blatant misogyny?
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 10:14 pm (UTC)I don't see many people on this post defending this comic book issue. What I did see is different people framing their issues with the story in different ways.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 10:53 pm (UTC)I don't know if you've paid much attention to my stance on sexuality in the past, but I'm pretty much the last person to complain that women who have sex are automatically being *used.*
And if the male character was depicted as a smouldering, fanservice-y sex bomb, and the two girls as eager, salivating chumps? Well, it might be tacky but at least it would be original.
But what do I know - I mean, I have sex compulsively sometimes. Maybe I'm not emotionally healthy enough to judge.
Mod Note
Date: 2011-09-21 07:46 pm (UTC)And please, don't attack comic book authors. Attack and criticise their work all you want, but it is not acceptable to say "Fuck you" to any of the DC staff.
Mod Warning
Date: 2011-09-22 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 10:16 pm (UTC)..real good.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:28 pm (UTC)So on the one hand, everything with Jason is still in place, one presumes, so that makes it okay for him to be a prick to Dick (oh, the rhyming), but Roy's much more uncertain, and so is Kory. For all we know, DC could just be saying she's like this full-stop and always was.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:37 pm (UTC)If you think about the scene with Kory/Roy/Jason above is only a problem (except to a noisy few) if the Dick Grayson factor (and all 3's relationship with him) is taken into account. Lobdell has said that Dick/Kory is still canon, Roy/Dick's friendship is still canon, Jason/Dick's whatever sibling issues are still canon. But I cannot believe that and still believe that Kory would casually have sex with the bitter brother of the "love of her life" or that Roy would unhesitatingly oblige Kory with sex with Dick still in the background. Pre-DCnU Roy wouldn't even have done that and the fact he would sleep with practically anything was a running joke in the last continuity. Now if Dick/Kory's relationship on the other hand still existed in the post-Flashpoint world but wasn't anything apparently memorable then what was the point of keeping it!
They should have just rebooted the whole thing, no past histories, nada so we would have understood that the past Kory is not this Kory, the past Roy is not this Roy and so forth. But DC wants to have it both ways and its just made things even more confusing for the reader. And people thought continuity was screwed up and hard to understand before.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:42 pm (UTC)But their approach is horribly, horribly screwy. I've seen people not understanding in the slightest how Justice League can feature Hal as a GL whilst the GL book has Sinestro with the ring and Hal as a depowered loser, for instance - they don't get the time gap and what not. The same goes for Morrison's Action Comics, which seems to be confusing people as to why he's not in the same gear as Superman or JL.
It's a mess, and it's all because the inmates are running the asylum, frankly. johns wants to have his cake, eat it, and have another portion.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:51 am (UTC)So even here it seems they're establishing that Kory was in the Titans and had that history, only her new alien brain can't keep those kinds of details in her head so she's forgotten them. Jason and Roy are psyched about the advantages of this.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-22 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:24 pm (UTC)Funnily enough, I'm more bothered by the fan reaction of 'WHAT WILL DICK THINK??!?!' than anything on these pages. Not directed at you, of course, but that's one of the things being raised over at CBR, as if Kory's a piece of Dick's property.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:30 pm (UTC)The book's all over the place, to be fair. Roy should be kicking up more of a fuss about why she's saying she doesn't know said people he's asking about, and yet doesn't seem to know her much at all, when he should, really.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-21 09:34 pm (UTC)