Information about Starfire-gate
Oct. 5th, 2011 09:47 amSo a blogger had a conversation with Scott Lobdell a while back and they discussed Starfire-gate.
the blog post can be found here. http://thefiretonight.tumblr.com/post/1
"Kory was definitely being evasive/sarcastic because she did NOT want to talk about her past with them and issues that will come up later in the series. She does not have a memory of ‘a goldfish’ as some people have been saying ‘round the ‘net.
Also, Jason was lying to Roy about certain implications he made in the first issue to Roy about Kory. I won’t say what exactly because I don’t want to spoil the next issue, especially since it’s not out yet."
so it appears that some of our guesses were correct, Kory was being purposfully missleading, and Jason had been lying. Her memory issues are not issues at all, she does NOT want to talk about her past for some reason.
the post goes onto say that Lobdell seemed visibly upset about some of the posting coments people have been leaving on message boards (not the interviews or reviews themselves, but the comments people have left... and i think we can safely assume that the comments were the "starfire is a slut" and the like comments.
I know i a have been one to defend Lobdell during Starfire-gate, and it is because I KNOW he is a great writer, and a great writer of women. which is why the impressions we got from RHATO troubled me. Also as a dabbler in writing i know about playing "the long grift" card and the dangers there in.
hopfully this will comfort some of us who have been... worrying about this
title. The fact that Lobdell actually seems to care about this also helps...
I will be blogging about this more in depth later.
anyways, for legality, because he traveled with her....

One Page From Animal Man #2

no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:08 pm (UTC)"A woman who enjoys casual sex? It must be a cry of help because she was raped and is broken and suffering! Because no healthy and happy woman could ever possibly enjoy casual sex!
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:18 pm (UTC)It's just that in context, I can't think of it ever being handled in a way that wouldn't be a big, offensive train-wreck.
But, hey, maybe Rucka would have been able to do it!
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:27 pm (UTC)(I don't even know Andreyko).
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:31 pm (UTC)Mark Andreyko wrote The Manhunter series (staring Kate Spencer... whom i miss dearly, as Munhunter)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:37 pm (UTC)I haven't read Alias yet. It's on my tbr list though, but pretty low because I've been told it was also using a lot of references to other stuff that could make me feel lost easily.
Actually so is Manhunter, but it's pretty low because I heard Andreyko was pretty Conservative and sometimes it showed in his writing.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:45 pm (UTC)Alias... yeah i suppose there is back story there... but 99.9% of it is explained in the series itself.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 09:03 pm (UTC)and isn't Byrne very pro gay?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 09:08 pm (UTC)that said, what you say is true, im just saying from what i have read of Andreyko's writing, conservative NEVER came to mind...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:43 pm (UTC)Because it seems like virtually every strong and independent female character in comics is either a virgin, a stable wife/girlfriend, or a rape survivor.
It's not the idea of a rape survivor who tries to deal with her trauma by sleeping around a lot that bothers me. It's the inevitability of it. It's like it's so bad and shameful for a woman to freely enjoy casual sex, that she must be turned into a victim to make her sympathetic. "Guys, it's ok, she is not a slut, she is just suffering!"
Even if Rucka wrote the greatest story ever starring a a rape survivor who tries to deal with her trauma by sleeping around a lot, the topic would still be more of the same.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 02:19 am (UTC)Or was that pre-reboot Starfire to a degree?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-06 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:35 pm (UTC)I am quite thankful that Lobdell avoided that minefield. For now, at least
no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-05 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-07 12:41 am (UTC)