1 from Amazing Spider-man 673
Nov. 3rd, 2011 06:25 pm
what ever, i don't care, i STILL think that MJ could and SHOULD be the next Scarlet Spider! in my head, she is... and i will DRAW IT!..... maybe... i don't know.... SOME ONE WILL DRAW IT I INVOKE RULE 32!!!
I would Also LIke to reward you guys who helped me with my paper with this video my professor showed us at the begining of class as we discussed Joss Whedon, Feminism and Astonishing X-Men: Gifted
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYaczoJM
http://fanboywatchtower.tumblr.com/p
i may be a little bit in love with this man...
*Note: POsted my blog link which has he video because for some reason i can't get the link to embed here...

no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:29 am (UTC)on buffy you had through high school Buffy, Cordelia, willow, anya, Joyce, faith and then Giles, angel, and xander, oz for the last season or two.
then in college you had buffy, anya, willow, tara, Dawn, Joyce and then Giles, Xander, and Riley for... a season (never liked riley)
for him everyone was fair game.
and i don't think he Loves Victimizing them at all. He loves showing that women don't have to be victims. that you can throw them through the ringer, just like you would a male character, and they will come out stronger.
also i don't think he victimized them at all. the show was about turning tropes on their head. victims stayed down, victims need to be saved especially if they are women. here, they didn't stay down, they did the saving, and they kicked ass doing it. if they suffered it wasn't because they were women its because of the line of work they were in. and anytime some tried to victimize them they stood up and fought against it and usually won.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:34 am (UTC)I would have occasionally liked to see them avoid their problems because it would have made it seem less like the universe going "well we can't torment you anymore this year if we want there to be a next year to torment you."
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:47 am (UTC)she was the worse treated but she always (well save the slump she had season 7 it had its moments but i was like... geez buff, stop being sooo not buffy) remained buffy.
willow came close. it wasn't because she had power though, it was because she abused that power. she became a "Junky" because she may have started out using her powers for good, but ended up using her powers for personal gain.
Giles was tortured by Angelus, and more often than not he was the helpless victim, same with xander.
i don't know. i always loved that no matter how hard the universe tried to hold buffy and her friends back. no matter how many men (in the form of the watcher's council) tried to control her, she would have none of it. (again season 7 not my favorite season, it had good points "musical!!!" but didn't love her being all mopey)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 10:11 pm (UTC)I honestly didn't believe that for Willow's character, and also felt like the way she was written her not abusing the power was not a possibility. THat's part of the issue I have about what happened to female characters in the Buffyverse. The universe twisted and warped and bent over backwards to make them usffer. Except for Angel I didn't feel that happened with the guys.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 12:18 pm (UTC)I also think there's something of a difference between 'suffering we see on screen' and 'suffering we're only told about'.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 02:31 pm (UTC)I will concede that on-screen suffering has more of an emotional impact than off screen. Though I would still argue that Angel is the worst off even if we stick only to he stuff we see. He did get to see his son taken to hell by an enemy and then come back as a young adult raised to hat him by the aforementioned enemy.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:07 pm (UTC)also, the scene you are talking about with Buffy, she tries to end the relationship with spike because she knows its unhealthy. then he tries to rape her, and she fights him off, thats why she says "I could never love you" because she could never love a rapist.
I think spike went through his share of suffering season 7 once he got his soul back.
riley became addicted to getting sucked... ummm by vampires i mean... his blood i mean.... yeah....
giles was tortured by angelus, (and like i said, frequent victim of kidnapping and torture)
Angel lost his son to his archnemisis and saw them both escape into a hell dimension. he also had to give up his son so that he could have a normal life.
yes, the female characters may cry, and have break downs, and get addicted to magick, but they always stand up and heal themselves. (well okay xander sorta saved willow, but it wasn't because he was a man, it was because he was her best friend.)
Xander broke down when the Priest took his eye. he tried to be all brave when buffy was there, but cried into willows arms. i think the attack on him was far more emotional than the physical act of taking his eye.
On Firefly, Mal was an emotional wreck. Zoe pretty much went through the same thing he did and was FAR MORE adjusted to life than he was, Mal was still "Damaged"
does he seem to lump more onto the female characters? yes, because the female characters are the main characters (except for firefly and a side from river, Mal is the most damaged there) and male characters are mostly secondary characters.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:20 pm (UTC)Yes, I know why she says that. That doesn't change the point.
Spike is not a bad counter-point; his basement-wallowing teary angst is closest to the way the suffering of female characters is wallowed in.
Angel lost his son to his archnemisis and saw them both escape into a hell dimension. he also had to give up his son so that he could have a normal life.
Yeah, well, Darla would have experienced that except oh wait, she'd already killed herself to save her baby because the primal power of motherhood overcomes vampire evil or something?
yes, the female characters may cry, and have break downs, and get addicted to magick, but they always stand up and heal themselves. (well okay xander sorta saved willow, but it wasn't because he was a man, it was because he was her best friend.)
So? The male characters generally don't have the breakdowns like that.
Xander broke down when the Priest took his eye. he tried to be all brave when buffy was there, but cried into willows arms. i think the attack on him was far more emotional than the physical act of taking his eye.
Yeah, once, and speaking as someone who's lost the sight of an eye, it should probably have had longer-reaching traumatic effects than one crying session.
I think he did a lot better job with the women in Firefly, much more range; Zoe, and to some extent Inara, were much more collected and stoic, providing a nice contrast to River and Kaylee's much more emotional stuff. I still don't recall Mal ever having a weeping breakdown or screaming about how he's vile and hates himself while punching his body, though.
yes, because the female characters are the main characters (except for firefly and a side from river, Mal is the most damaged there) and male characters are mostly secondary characters.
...who was the main character in Angel?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:51 pm (UTC)i accidently left out angel too, come on though, angel was ANGSTY and wesly was in HORRIBLE shape after Connor was taken and after Fred died, he wallowed ALOT AND hated himself. (though i still think Spike is the best counterpoint for that)
i would also like to note, that the episodes you sited, (ie seeing red, the spike attepmted rape scene) was not written nore directed by Joss Whedon, by season.... 5 i think, Whedon was more hands off on the series. same goes for the lullaby episode (the episode where darla stakes herself) true he might have planned the over all arch, and might have okayed the episodes, but that went to Stephen S. Deknight and Tim Minear respectively, as they both wrote and directed both those episodes.
he was far more hands on with Firefly. And if you notice most of the episodes he wrote and directed and had more direct contact with are the better episodes of the series.
i am not saying he is perfect, or he gets everything right, but he is good, and has done alot more for female empowerment than any other male creator ever has. (IMHO)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:12 pm (UTC)Yes, Angel was angsty, but in the stoic brooding way. The suffering was quite gendered. Women were much more prone to breaking under the strain, weeping, having to lean on others.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:34 pm (UTC)Though I would like to point out that Buffy's banging of an evil vampire also ended with him getting redeemed and going all heroic sacrifice. He just got to come back because people liked Spike more than Darla.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:39 pm (UTC)Mmph, I'd definitely argue they were handled in very different ways - Buffy's situation had a distinct air of 'this is what you get for banging an evil vampire' whereas Darla didn't even need a soul before she was sacrificing her life for the baby and charging Angel with sad-eyed messages.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:10 pm (UTC)And team Angel lying abouts Fred's death to the Burkles is pretty messed-up, but IIRC Wesley was goint to tell them before Illyria walked up pretending to be Fred. And they probably spared the Burkles some pain by not telling them that this person who looks,acts and sounds like their daughter is just an ancient evil using her corpse as a shell.
I also seem to remember that the baby's soul was also functioning as Darla's soul at the end, and that's why she was all concience-y and self sacrifice-y. And Spike did choose to go and get a soul of his own souless volition, so that's at least some pre-soul redemtion for him.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:15 pm (UTC)Ugh that makes no sense, even in the inconsistent Buffyverse. Did they ever clarify he deliberately got his soul? I thought it was left ambiguous - he could have been going to get the chip removed. And I don't even know if it's redemption, really, as he's previously shown himself to do the most outlandish things for love; it's not a sign of redemption but obsession.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:45 pm (UTC)okay yeah. i know, but for me... its strange... the whole soul thing in the buffy/angel-verse. did angel recieve A soul or HIS soul back? what is a soul. how is it different from memories? are souls and memories intwined? if a part of Fred's memories survives then doesn't a part of her soul survive?
Illyria said that she is not now, nor will she ever be fred... and yeah i get that. but she isn't iilyria either. she's a new being calling herself Illyria.
as much as i loved fred (and really i didn!) i LOVED Illyria because one it gave Amy Acker a completely differnt person to play (and i love amy acker) and 2) it didn't do away with fred completely (despite the soul burning up thing which again, i question)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:55 pm (UTC)A lot of the mythology of the Buffyverse is inconsistent, to be honest. But they seemed pretty definite about Fred's soul being destroyed. I don't quite know what you mean by her not being Illyria, though?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:15 pm (UTC)okay back on topic, yeah i know, there are some inconsistencies. with how the buffy universe works. but as far as illyria, she is being shown to be progressivly more under the influence of fred's memories, at this point, she is as much fred as she is illyria. fred's memories are no longer just echos in the back of her head. as an old god she could care less about humanity. or anything like that, but Fred's memories and personality, and desires influce her to the degree that she is making judgements based on that. even going so far as to tell angel that despite the fact that she is not now nor will she ever be fred, she IS a formerly evil person who is trying to redeem themselves, just like him.
side bar about THIS icon, is that the issue where she takes in a portion of Sentry's Void persona?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 08:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:52 pm (UTC)poor wash...
you know on a slight tangent, the scene where Zoe tells them that she is going to bury her husband totally made me think of Susanah Dean in The Dark Tower when she tells Roland that she is "Gonna bury my man" and now i cannot think of ANYONE else who should play Sussanah Odetta Dean but Gina Torres!