shadowpsykie: (Happy Willow)
[personal profile] shadowpsykie posting in [community profile] scans_daily


what ever, i don't care, i STILL think that MJ could and SHOULD be the next Scarlet Spider! in my head, she is... and i will DRAW IT!..... maybe... i don't know.... SOME ONE WILL DRAW IT I INVOKE RULE 32!!!





I would Also LIke to reward you guys who helped me with my paper with this video my professor showed us at the begining of class as we discussed Joss Whedon, Feminism and Astonishing X-Men: Gifted

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYaczoJMRhs

http://fanboywatchtower.tumblr.com/post/12310564628/so-in-my-graphic-novel-class-at-cal-state

i may be a little bit in love with this man...
*Note: POsted my blog link which has he video because for some reason i can't get the link to embed here...

Date: 2011-11-04 02:31 pm (UTC)
deepspaceartist: Ed Robinson of Barnaked Ladies making a funny face behind Tyler Stewart (Default)
From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist
I wouldn't consider soul annilation 'suffering' so much as 'death without an afterlife'. While Fred definitley has the worst fate of all the main characters who die and stay dead, it is not suffering since one cannot suffer if one no longer exists in any form other than memories.

I will concede that on-screen suffering has more of an emotional impact than off screen. Though I would still argue that Angel is the worst off even if we stick only to he stuff we see. He did get to see his son taken to hell by an enemy and then come back as a young adult raised to hat him by the aforementioned enemy.

Date: 2011-11-04 03:52 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Mine)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
I don't think we're quite talking about the same thing. When I say suffering, I'm not just talking about bad things happening, I'm talking about their responses to it. There's a lot more focus on the suffering of women, and they cry and have breakdowns and entire episodes devoted to how they just can't cope with the heavy burdens of their responsibilities, and they get addicted to magic and fall into unhealthy relationships they regret and ugh. When Angel can't cope, he murders a bunch of lawyers and bangs a hot chick who then is saved by the power of motherhood and kills herself to save the foetus. When Angel bangs a evil vampire because he can't cope, it ultimately redeems her and him. When Buffy does it, it ends with her all tearful and cringing in her bathrobe all I COULD NEVER LOVE YOU.

Date: 2011-11-04 04:20 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Hulk map)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
Yeah, I'm talking about the same incident.

Yes, I know why she says that. That doesn't change the point.

Spike is not a bad counter-point; his basement-wallowing teary angst is closest to the way the suffering of female characters is wallowed in.

Angel lost his son to his archnemisis and saw them both escape into a hell dimension. he also had to give up his son so that he could have a normal life.

Yeah, well, Darla would have experienced that except oh wait, she'd already killed herself to save her baby because the primal power of motherhood overcomes vampire evil or something?

yes, the female characters may cry, and have break downs, and get addicted to magick, but they always stand up and heal themselves. (well okay xander sorta saved willow, but it wasn't because he was a man, it was because he was her best friend.)

So? The male characters generally don't have the breakdowns like that.

Xander broke down when the Priest took his eye. he tried to be all brave when buffy was there, but cried into willows arms. i think the attack on him was far more emotional than the physical act of taking his eye.

Yeah, once, and speaking as someone who's lost the sight of an eye, it should probably have had longer-reaching traumatic effects than one crying session.

I think he did a lot better job with the women in Firefly, much more range; Zoe, and to some extent Inara, were much more collected and stoic, providing a nice contrast to River and Kaylee's much more emotional stuff. I still don't recall Mal ever having a weeping breakdown or screaming about how he's vile and hates himself while punching his body, though.

yes, because the female characters are the main characters (except for firefly and a side from river, Mal is the most damaged there) and male characters are mostly secondary characters.

...who was the main character in Angel?

Date: 2011-11-04 05:12 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Kelda)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
I, for one, am not saying either he's perfect or awful. I think he genuinely tries to be feminist, and sometimes succeeds and sometimes doesn't. I really liked Buffy, and enjoyed Angel and Firefly. But there are problems with Firefly too; Inara's profession is handled very awkwardly, and there's race issues. We can criticise his work without hating him, and we can like his work while still acknowledging flaws.

Yes, Angel was angsty, but in the stoic brooding way. The suffering was quite gendered. Women were much more prone to breaking under the strain, weeping, having to lean on others.

Date: 2011-11-04 05:34 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Jen she-hulk chinhand)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
Well, I think to some extent perception of these issues does depend on how you're treated - so even if you strongly identify with women, if aren't perceived as one, you're not usually treated as one, and if you don't identify as a woman (rather than with women) then I don't think the messages are internalised the same way, you know? It's just so rare to see women who are the badass stars who swallow their pain and are stoic - I would have loved Firefly that much more if Zoe had been the main character.

Well, let's say "tries to behave in a feminist way", and tries to produce work that conforms to his ideals.

Date: 2011-11-04 05:57 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Sue Storm)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
I personally think he is a feminist, i consider myself a feminist. there are other female feminists who concider him a feminist. My Graphic Novel professor, who is a female, says that he is a feminist. There are femists that say because he is not a woman and because i am not a woman, We cannot be feminists. there are so many different types and factions of feminism that its impossible to say "This is the definition of feminism"

Okay? I'm not trying to argue with you about who is and who is not a feminist. I'm not trying to argue about the definition of feminism. I'm saying that I think Joss Whedon believes in the equality of women and tries to illustrate those ideals in his work. In my view, sometimes he succeeds, and sometimes he doesn't.

I like stoic. I'd like to see more stoic, badass women. They're not the only characters I like - I loved Kaylee - but I enjoy stoic dutybound types.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] jlbarnett - Date: 2011-11-05 01:13 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-11-04 06:01 pm (UTC)
salinea: anthy is watching you and her eyeglasses are all shiny (creepy anthy)
From: [personal profile] salinea
The fact that Whedon is a feminist doesn't mean we can't criticize his work from a feminist basis, I hope.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] salinea - Date: 2011-11-04 06:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-11-04 05:34 pm (UTC)
deepspaceartist: Ed Robinson of Barnaked Ladies making a funny face behind Tyler Stewart (Default)
From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist
From that point of view, yeah, you're right. Buffy (the show) definitly spent most of it's suffering time focusing on the women. Giles and Oz while he was there were all stoic, and Xander's problems were usually treated as comic relief. I don't think Angel (also the show) spent too much time on it, though. Cordelia wasn't the dewll and angst type, and Fred (more or less) got over Pylea pretty quick.

Though I would like to point out that Buffy's banging of an evil vampire also ended with him getting redeemed and going all heroic sacrifice. He just got to come back because people liked Spike more than Darla.

Date: 2011-11-04 05:39 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (americat)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
Angel had some distinctly skeevy bits; Cordelia's whole plot was... weird as hell, to be honest, and involved getting knocked up by demons twice. And Fred's lingering painful death was somewhat ooky. (And can I say, I really don't like that they never told her parents and never passed on Fred's last messages to them?)

Mmph, I'd definitely argue they were handled in very different ways - Buffy's situation had a distinct air of 'this is what you get for banging an evil vampire' whereas Darla didn't even need a soul before she was sacrificing her life for the baby and charging Angel with sad-eyed messages.

Date: 2011-11-04 06:10 pm (UTC)
deepspaceartist: Ed Robinson of Barnaked Ladies making a funny face behind Tyler Stewart (Default)
From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist
Well the first demon pregnancy was a one off thing, like Buffy's telepathy or Xander's magic siphillis, not part of Cordelia's overall plot. But yeah, Cordy's plot got a bit screwed-up when Jasmine got involved. No argument there. Before that it was just Cordelia becoming less of the selfish person she was in Buffy, and more of an actual hero. Then came season four. I like to think that S4 Cordy is all Jasmine and the real Cordelia had nothing to do with it after her memory came back.

And team Angel lying abouts Fred's death to the Burkles is pretty messed-up, but IIRC Wesley was goint to tell them before Illyria walked up pretending to be Fred. And they probably spared the Burkles some pain by not telling them that this person who looks,acts and sounds like their daughter is just an ancient evil using her corpse as a shell.

I also seem to remember that the baby's soul was also functioning as Darla's soul at the end, and that's why she was all concience-y and self sacrifice-y. And Spike did choose to go and get a soul of his own souless volition, so that's at least some pre-soul redemtion for him.

Date: 2011-11-04 06:15 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Carol Vulcan)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
Well, I feel they should really have told the Burkles their daughter was dead as soon as possible. Rather than forget about them until they turned up. I mean - she told Wesley to tell them things. And he just... didn't.

Ugh that makes no sense, even in the inconsistent Buffyverse. Did they ever clarify he deliberately got his soul? I thought it was left ambiguous - he could have been going to get the chip removed. And I don't even know if it's redemption, really, as he's previously shown himself to do the most outlandish things for love; it's not a sign of redemption but obsession.

Date: 2011-11-04 06:43 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Tony and a pony)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
how does that not make sense? the idea that a mother and a child share a connection both physical and beyond is not a new concept. Piper had the power to create forcefields because her son was able to create them.

Well I don't think anyone's arguing a mother doesn't share a physical connection with the foetus she is gestating. (Although how the fuck Darla is gestating a baby when she is dead...) But the Buffyverse has never addressed a nonphysical link as far as I'm aware. (Piper's from Charmed isn't she?) When Cordelia was pregnant with demons they didn't catch souls from her, did they?

yeah they did, Spike said that he did it for her, to be the man she deserves.

Yeah, that was what I was describing as ambiguous. Still, if he told Angel he went to get it deliberately, that'll do.

Spike previously offered to murder his sire for Buffy; getting a soul can easily be interpreted as another move in that style.

Date: 2011-11-04 07:32 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Steve's butt - Super Soldier)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
Mother's have this... connection to thier children.

Sorry, but if you're setting up a magical connection in fiction, you need to foreshadow it/set it up a little. I'm not a mother, but I do have a mother (as is customary) and we certainly don't have any kind of spiritual connection, and I can assure you she has no particular insight into whether I'm well or not. (Exciting times with severe appendicitis!)

IDK, she's been pregnant with demons twice, haha. They didn't really explore the biology of the situations.

Date: 2011-11-05 03:19 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] jlbarnett
Well I don't think anyone's arguing a mother doesn't share a physical connection with the foetus she is gestating. (Although how the fuck Darla is gestating a baby when she is dead...)

magic. Angel went out and performed a ritual that would allow a life that should end to continue. But it wouldn't work for Darla because she'd been brought back from the dead once. Then dead sperm met live egg and instead of no kid because Angel's dead the spell kicks in and suddenly.. Connor.

When Cordelia was pregnant with demons they didn't catch souls from her, did they?

No, but she did catch demon-ness from them

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-06 03:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] jlbarnett - Date: 2011-11-06 08:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-06 08:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] jlbarnett - Date: 2011-11-06 08:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-11-04 06:51 pm (UTC)
deepspaceartist: Ed Robinson of Barnaked Ladies making a funny face behind Tyler Stewart (Default)
From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist
Wesley definitly sould have gone to the Burkles sooner, of coruse. But considering he just had another in the long line of the universe kicking him in the crotch, I can't really blame him for not being together enough to do that.

Yeah, the whole Spike thing suspect, the only time we hear about him trying for his soul is from him after the fact, and even a souled Spike is not the most trustworth of sources. Fact remains that Spike was redeemed by the end of Buffy, though.

And as for the Darla/babySoul thing, two vamps having a kid was already inpossible, so why does the babySoul thing make no sense? It's not like there were well defined Buffyverse rules about the effect of souled babies in souless mothers.

Date: 2011-11-04 07:03 pm (UTC)
valtyr: (Rhodey chinhands)
From: [personal profile] valtyr
You'd think Wolfram and Hart's personnel department would have measures... and you know what, I'm sorry Wesley, but actually Fred's life and death are more important to her parents than to you, and the last fucking thing she ever asked you to do was talk to them. I actually do blame him, and Angel, and everyone else who knew she had parents who loved her very much and didn't bother to inform them their daughter was dead.

He was, but it was much less directly connected to the boning - the boning was presented as actually damaging to Buffy - whereas Angel's evil-banging produced a miracle baby of redemption. (I mean, if we want to compare their redemptions, Spike went out and got a soul. Darla had one injected into her by Angel's penis, I suppose.)

IDK, it's just a step too far. Her getting knocked up was bad, but the idea that having a soul bobbing about inside you magically gives you morals seems loltastic. And, you know, taps into that whole thing where motherhood is magical and special and redeems bad women. And the whole thing where Women Must Die For Their Unborn Children Because I Think We All Know Who's The Important Person Here. Which I'm not saying Whedon was deliberately invoking, but they're some stale old tropes.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 07:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist - Date: 2011-11-04 07:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 07:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist - Date: 2011-11-04 08:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 08:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist - Date: 2011-11-04 09:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-11-04 07:44 pm (UTC)
deepspaceartist: Ed Robinson of Barnaked Ladies making a funny face behind Tyler Stewart (Default)
From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist
You're right. Angel or Gunn or someone should have told them. I just don't personally blame the guy who watched her die and now has to deal with the demon-god wearing her corpse around every day. And I reeally wouldn't trust W&H's personnel department with any sort of death notification. Especially since like 90% of W&H deaths are murdered by co-worker/client/Demon working for evil god.

The whole 'motherhood redeems' thing, while defitly a tired old trope, is not really the whole story there though. It's one (often questionable) thing to have a woman turn good because of and/or die to save an unborn baby, but it is another to have a vampire woman kill herself because she knows she'll likely become a remorseless killing machine after the baby is born or dies. It's not like any concience or morals the demon in Darla's corpse had would last after the baby is no longer also in the corpse.

I think what we can all take away from this is that, while often entertaining, the Buffyverse in incredibly convoluted and confusing.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 07:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist - Date: 2011-11-04 07:57 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 08:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist - Date: 2011-11-04 08:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 08:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] deepspaceartist - Date: 2011-11-04 09:53 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-04 09:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-11-05 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] jlbarnett
personally I would think, since W&H's contracts extend past death and the fact we've seen soul removal is possible that they'd have steps to pull her soul out so they wouldn't be cheated.

As for the difference between Buffy and Spike and ANgel and Darla, Buffy was just miserable and wasn't looking to or going to get out of it, and Angel was looking for some sort of sign

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] valtyr - Date: 2011-11-06 03:14 pm (UTC) - Expand

Profile

scans_daily: (Default)
Scans Daily
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, [community profile] scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.

Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, [community profile] scans_daily is probably not for you.

Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.

May 2013

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags