1 from Amazing Spider-man 673
Nov. 3rd, 2011 06:25 pm
what ever, i don't care, i STILL think that MJ could and SHOULD be the next Scarlet Spider! in my head, she is... and i will DRAW IT!..... maybe... i don't know.... SOME ONE WILL DRAW IT I INVOKE RULE 32!!!
I would Also LIke to reward you guys who helped me with my paper with this video my professor showed us at the begining of class as we discussed Joss Whedon, Feminism and Astonishing X-Men: Gifted
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYaczoJM
http://fanboywatchtower.tumblr.com/p
i may be a little bit in love with this man...
*Note: POsted my blog link which has he video because for some reason i can't get the link to embed here...

no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:07 pm (UTC)also, the scene you are talking about with Buffy, she tries to end the relationship with spike because she knows its unhealthy. then he tries to rape her, and she fights him off, thats why she says "I could never love you" because she could never love a rapist.
I think spike went through his share of suffering season 7 once he got his soul back.
riley became addicted to getting sucked... ummm by vampires i mean... his blood i mean.... yeah....
giles was tortured by angelus, (and like i said, frequent victim of kidnapping and torture)
Angel lost his son to his archnemisis and saw them both escape into a hell dimension. he also had to give up his son so that he could have a normal life.
yes, the female characters may cry, and have break downs, and get addicted to magick, but they always stand up and heal themselves. (well okay xander sorta saved willow, but it wasn't because he was a man, it was because he was her best friend.)
Xander broke down when the Priest took his eye. he tried to be all brave when buffy was there, but cried into willows arms. i think the attack on him was far more emotional than the physical act of taking his eye.
On Firefly, Mal was an emotional wreck. Zoe pretty much went through the same thing he did and was FAR MORE adjusted to life than he was, Mal was still "Damaged"
does he seem to lump more onto the female characters? yes, because the female characters are the main characters (except for firefly and a side from river, Mal is the most damaged there) and male characters are mostly secondary characters.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:20 pm (UTC)Yes, I know why she says that. That doesn't change the point.
Spike is not a bad counter-point; his basement-wallowing teary angst is closest to the way the suffering of female characters is wallowed in.
Angel lost his son to his archnemisis and saw them both escape into a hell dimension. he also had to give up his son so that he could have a normal life.
Yeah, well, Darla would have experienced that except oh wait, she'd already killed herself to save her baby because the primal power of motherhood overcomes vampire evil or something?
yes, the female characters may cry, and have break downs, and get addicted to magick, but they always stand up and heal themselves. (well okay xander sorta saved willow, but it wasn't because he was a man, it was because he was her best friend.)
So? The male characters generally don't have the breakdowns like that.
Xander broke down when the Priest took his eye. he tried to be all brave when buffy was there, but cried into willows arms. i think the attack on him was far more emotional than the physical act of taking his eye.
Yeah, once, and speaking as someone who's lost the sight of an eye, it should probably have had longer-reaching traumatic effects than one crying session.
I think he did a lot better job with the women in Firefly, much more range; Zoe, and to some extent Inara, were much more collected and stoic, providing a nice contrast to River and Kaylee's much more emotional stuff. I still don't recall Mal ever having a weeping breakdown or screaming about how he's vile and hates himself while punching his body, though.
yes, because the female characters are the main characters (except for firefly and a side from river, Mal is the most damaged there) and male characters are mostly secondary characters.
...who was the main character in Angel?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:51 pm (UTC)i accidently left out angel too, come on though, angel was ANGSTY and wesly was in HORRIBLE shape after Connor was taken and after Fred died, he wallowed ALOT AND hated himself. (though i still think Spike is the best counterpoint for that)
i would also like to note, that the episodes you sited, (ie seeing red, the spike attepmted rape scene) was not written nore directed by Joss Whedon, by season.... 5 i think, Whedon was more hands off on the series. same goes for the lullaby episode (the episode where darla stakes herself) true he might have planned the over all arch, and might have okayed the episodes, but that went to Stephen S. Deknight and Tim Minear respectively, as they both wrote and directed both those episodes.
he was far more hands on with Firefly. And if you notice most of the episodes he wrote and directed and had more direct contact with are the better episodes of the series.
i am not saying he is perfect, or he gets everything right, but he is good, and has done alot more for female empowerment than any other male creator ever has. (IMHO)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:12 pm (UTC)Yes, Angel was angsty, but in the stoic brooding way. The suffering was quite gendered. Women were much more prone to breaking under the strain, weeping, having to lean on others.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:20 pm (UTC)yeah i know his stuff has some problems. but he does try to do right (i don't like saying "He tries to be feminist" because that implies that a, he is not, and b, there is a set of criteria for feminism. there are so many different types of feminism and not all of them agree with each other. it is a difficult term to pin down because there is no ONE definition for feminism)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:34 pm (UTC)Well, let's say "tries to behave in a feminist way", and tries to produce work that conforms to his ideals.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:53 pm (UTC)as far as stoicism (whose definition has long since lost it's true meaning) yeah, i love Zoe, and Inara because they are cool, level headed and kick ass. but i also love Zoe because she loves her husband, and I love inara because she is the resident mama bear (well everyone is the mama bear/papa wolf when it comes to Kaylee, messing with kaylee is just not healthy... for anyone.)
i liked Mal's and Zoe's partnership. they played off each other well.
Purely "Stoic" characters are uninteresting to me... which is why i was only ever luke warm to Angel (as a character, Angelus was far more entertaining... evil but hell he had personality) and Oz (oh he's cute but that does not make him interesting) when his composure broke, when he lost the Stoicism, THEN he became more interesting... of corse when that happened he left... so...
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:57 pm (UTC)Okay? I'm not trying to argue with you about who is and who is not a feminist. I'm not trying to argue about the definition of feminism. I'm saying that I think Joss Whedon believes in the equality of women and tries to illustrate those ideals in his work. In my view, sometimes he succeeds, and sometimes he doesn't.
I like stoic. I'd like to see more stoic, badass women. They're not the only characters I like - I loved Kaylee - but I enjoy stoic dutybound types.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:34 pm (UTC)Though I would like to point out that Buffy's banging of an evil vampire also ended with him getting redeemed and going all heroic sacrifice. He just got to come back because people liked Spike more than Darla.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:39 pm (UTC)Mmph, I'd definitely argue they were handled in very different ways - Buffy's situation had a distinct air of 'this is what you get for banging an evil vampire' whereas Darla didn't even need a soul before she was sacrificing her life for the baby and charging Angel with sad-eyed messages.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:10 pm (UTC)And team Angel lying abouts Fred's death to the Burkles is pretty messed-up, but IIRC Wesley was goint to tell them before Illyria walked up pretending to be Fred. And they probably spared the Burkles some pain by not telling them that this person who looks,acts and sounds like their daughter is just an ancient evil using her corpse as a shell.
I also seem to remember that the baby's soul was also functioning as Darla's soul at the end, and that's why she was all concience-y and self sacrifice-y. And Spike did choose to go and get a soul of his own souless volition, so that's at least some pre-soul redemtion for him.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:15 pm (UTC)Ugh that makes no sense, even in the inconsistent Buffyverse. Did they ever clarify he deliberately got his soul? I thought it was left ambiguous - he could have been going to get the chip removed. And I don't even know if it's redemption, really, as he's previously shown himself to do the most outlandish things for love; it's not a sign of redemption but obsession.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:25 pm (UTC)here its basically stating that the connection between a mother and a child goes beyond mere physical connection, its a connection that goes as far as the soul.
yeah they did, Spike said that he did it for her, to be the man she deserves. he reiterated it with ANgel later saying that he willingly set out to get his soul.
it might have been a sign of obsession it might not be (that is the part that was left ambiguous, we only have his word for it after the fact)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:43 pm (UTC)Well I don't think anyone's arguing a mother doesn't share a physical connection with the foetus she is gestating. (Although how the fuck Darla is gestating a baby when she is dead...) But the Buffyverse has never addressed a nonphysical link as far as I'm aware. (Piper's from Charmed isn't she?) When Cordelia was pregnant with demons they didn't catch souls from her, did they?
yeah they did, Spike said that he did it for her, to be the man she deserves.
Yeah, that was what I was describing as ambiguous. Still, if he told Angel he went to get it deliberately, that'll do.
Spike previously offered to murder his sire for Buffy; getting a soul can easily be interpreted as another move in that style.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 07:23 pm (UTC)yeah he repeated it after too in buffy when he was hugging the cross (it made me weepy...) but yeah, he mentioned it a couple of time in and too angel
yeah piper was from charmed but i was using that as an example of expanded thought. There are people here in our world now who beleive that a mother and child share link beyond the physical. Some that know when thier child is in danger. its something i beleive. Mother's have this... connection to thier children. i just think that's what they were trying to build off of... though i agree the discrepencies between cordelia's first pregnancy and Darla's (and yeah, the fact that both Darla and Angel were... you know... DEAD... then again i don't know too much about vampire biology sooo...) i can only think that... wasn't Cordelia's pregnancy like... different? weren't they eggs or something and not so much a fetus? (i see what you mean about discrecpancies...
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 07:32 pm (UTC)Sorry, but if you're setting up a magical connection in fiction, you need to foreshadow it/set it up a little. I'm not a mother, but I do have a mother (as is customary) and we certainly don't have any kind of spiritual connection, and I can assure you she has no particular insight into whether I'm well or not. (Exciting times with severe appendicitis!)
IDK, she's been pregnant with demons twice, haha. They didn't really explore the biology of the situations.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 03:19 am (UTC)magic. Angel went out and performed a ritual that would allow a life that should end to continue. But it wouldn't work for Darla because she'd been brought back from the dead once. Then dead sperm met live egg and instead of no kid because Angel's dead the spell kicks in and suddenly.. Connor.
No, but she did catch demon-ness from them
no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 03:16 pm (UTC)No, but she did catch demon-ness from them
On the one hand, I guess it's nice there was some precedent. On the other, rather than 'souls cross the placental barrier' it appears to be 'foetus trumps gestater'. Which is less than happy-making.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:51 pm (UTC)Yeah, the whole Spike thing suspect, the only time we hear about him trying for his soul is from him after the fact, and even a souled Spike is not the most trustworth of sources. Fact remains that Spike was redeemed by the end of Buffy, though.
And as for the Darla/babySoul thing, two vamps having a kid was already inpossible, so why does the babySoul thing make no sense? It's not like there were well defined Buffyverse rules about the effect of souled babies in souless mothers.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 07:03 pm (UTC)He was, but it was much less directly connected to the boning - the boning was presented as actually damaging to Buffy - whereas Angel's evil-banging produced a miracle baby of redemption. (I mean, if we want to compare their redemptions, Spike went out and got a soul. Darla had one injected into her by Angel's penis, I suppose.)
IDK, it's just a step too far. Her getting knocked up was bad, but the idea that having a soul bobbing about inside you magically gives you morals seems loltastic. And, you know, taps into that whole thing where motherhood is magical and special and redeems bad women. And the whole thing where Women Must Die For Their Unborn Children Because I Think We All Know Who's The Important Person Here. Which I'm not saying Whedon was deliberately invoking, but they're some stale old tropes.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 07:44 pm (UTC)The whole 'motherhood redeems' thing, while defitly a tired old trope, is not really the whole story there though. It's one (often questionable) thing to have a woman turn good because of and/or die to save an unborn baby, but it is another to have a vampire woman kill herself because she knows she'll likely become a remorseless killing machine after the baby is born or dies. It's not like any concience or morals the demon in Darla's corpse had would last after the baby is no longer also in the corpse.
I think what we can all take away from this is that, while often entertaining, the Buffyverse in incredibly convoluted and confusing.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 03:40 am (UTC)As for the difference between Buffy and Spike and ANgel and Darla, Buffy was just miserable and wasn't looking to or going to get out of it, and Angel was looking for some sort of sign
(no subject)
From: