Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:11 pm (UTC)In addition to being able to control plants and being an expert biochemist, Pam can get people to say what they know by putting them in a trance, and Dinah explains in the issue that her skills are needed for the baddies they're going after.
And was she in Arkkham/jail or wash she just chilling in a forest or something?
It is implied in the issue that she's very early in her bioterrorist career. So as far as I know, she hasn't been admitted to Arkham in DCnU. My guess is she's going the Catwoman route in that she's transitioning from being a full-time villain to anti-heroine instead.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 11:20 pm (UTC)If that's true then it seems likely that they could have gotten rid of Harley and Ivy's friendship. :/
Anyways, thanks for the answers. :p
no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:34 pm (UTC)Also glad they finally explained what that kiss was about in the first issue. Confused the hell out of me.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:44 pm (UTC)Ivy should be a stunningly beautiful woman, but be lethal to touch or kiss (It's sort of the point of her name). I may be old fashioned and out of date, but I think I'd fund a human with naturally GREEN skin to be someone I'd be more than a little bit cautious about going near.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-18 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-16 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 12:39 am (UTC)It seems to me Gail Simone really likes to build her heroes, is that an accurate assumption? I'm not a fan of the build them up style of story telling.
And I mentioned this in the past but don't recall getting a response. Does anyone else think Starling is actually going to be as bad news as everyone is telling Canary she is? She just seems totally untrustoworthy to me.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 09:11 am (UTC)Am I getting this right?
...so did Didio & co lose there job to someone else or what?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-17 07:54 pm (UTC)The choice of random black swirls seems just that. Random. It's not particularly thematic in any way.
The eyes look interesting, I suppose. I wouldn't have picked the eyes to look particularly monstrous on a seductress, but whatever.