overlooked all the times I stated my opinions with the caveats "to me" and "IMO"
Number of times you used the caveat "to me": zero. Number of times used the caveat "IMO": one. (No "in my opinion" either.)
Evidence seems to suggest it's not that I overlooked "all the times", it's just that you imagined them being there when they weren't there.
I'd love to believe this would give you the idea that maybe your opinions are being expressed more didatically and forcefully than you intend, but what are the odds?
I also like the way you translated "asking you to elaborate in an attempt to understand your point of view" as "goading you because you don't like a picture I like". Seriously, goading? Where did you even get that from? Did you even consider the idea you weren't expressing your opinion very clearly, or do you just assume anyone who doesn't instantly understand you is a grudgewanker?
I mean, that's an interesting story you've made up about how I was obsessing about you not liking a picture, but it's just that. I support your right to write fanfic about me, if that's how you get your jollies, but I'm going to have to ask you stop presenting it as truth.
Oh, and I see you've translate 'I didn't "ask you how" anything' as 'I didn't ask you anything'. I realise the stuff you pretend I say is easier to argue with, but perhaps you could just stick to the stuff I say. I mean, if you're going to make up all my interior and exterior dialogue, you might as well just write yourself notes, no need to bring the Internet or the real me into it.
Judging from what your earlier reply to me, I just assumed that paraphrasing was fair game now!
Also, you may have missed the "to me," but it is still there. It's even in some nice round brackets that make it easy to find.
Anyway, good night. I spend too much time in my day job dealing with horribly aggressive strangers to make it worthwhile engaging them in my spare time too.
Paraphrasing means keeping the meaning but changing the wording. Dropping 'how' changes the meaning. It's not paraphrasing.
Oh, I'm sorry for missing that instance. But as I'm sure you're not foolish enough to try and pretend one instance of each is all those times, my point stands that you're claiming to have qualified your opinion a lot more than you actually did.
Good night to you too. If you behave like this to the strangers you meet at your day job, I'm not at all surprised they're aggressive. Of course, on this showing, they could just be asking you questions which you assume are goading based on some offense you imagine they feel. How horribly aggressive!
While Scans Daily encourages vigorous debate, overt aggression is unnecessary. If you find a thread escalating, take a step back, or bow out of the conversation. While we note you attempted to bow out, you also returned to this thread.
While we realize there may be personality conflicts and that not all members need to get along or like one another, we ask that our members respect one another. Thank you.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 10:07 pm (UTC)Number of times you used the caveat "to me": zero.
Number of times used the caveat "IMO": one. (No "in my opinion" either.)
Evidence seems to suggest it's not that I overlooked "all the times", it's just that you imagined them being there when they weren't there.
I'd love to believe this would give you the idea that maybe your opinions are being expressed more didatically and forcefully than you intend, but what are the odds?
I also like the way you translated "asking you to elaborate in an attempt to understand your point of view" as "goading you because you don't like a picture I like". Seriously, goading? Where did you even get that from? Did you even consider the idea you weren't expressing your opinion very clearly, or do you just assume anyone who doesn't instantly understand you is a grudgewanker?
I mean, that's an interesting story you've made up about how I was obsessing about you not liking a picture, but it's just that. I support your right to write fanfic about me, if that's how you get your jollies, but I'm going to have to ask you stop presenting it as truth.
Oh, and I see you've translate 'I didn't "ask you how" anything' as 'I didn't ask you anything'. I realise the stuff you pretend I say is easier to argue with, but perhaps you could just stick to the stuff I say. I mean, if you're going to make up all my interior and exterior dialogue, you might as well just write yourself notes, no need to bring the Internet or the real me into it.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 10:17 pm (UTC)Also, you may have missed the "to me," but it is still there. It's even in some nice round brackets that make it easy to find.
Anyway, good night. I spend too much time in my day job dealing with horribly aggressive strangers to make it worthwhile engaging them in my spare time too.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 10:27 pm (UTC)Oh, I'm sorry for missing that instance. But as I'm sure you're not foolish enough to try and pretend one instance of each is all those times, my point stands that you're claiming to have qualified your opinion a lot more than you actually did.
Good night to you too. If you behave like this to the strangers you meet at your day job, I'm not at all surprised they're aggressive. Of course, on this showing, they could just be asking you questions which you assume are goading based on some offense you imagine they feel. How horribly aggressive!
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 10:40 pm (UTC)Not ever, really, but certainly not because you think they were too forceful in their opinions about sexy pictures of men. :/
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 10:54 pm (UTC)Mod Note
Date: 2011-11-28 11:07 pm (UTC)This is under discussion by the Mod team so we may come back it.
Mod Note
Date: 2011-12-04 05:03 pm (UTC)While we realize there may be personality conflicts and that not all members need to get along or like one another, we ask that our members respect one another. Thank you.