I have absolutely no problem with that fanart, either in concept or execution. :P If I have a quibble it's that for fairness' sake, Widow should have a full-frontal pose for a change like the guys usually get, while they shake their moneymakers....
Is that Rogue that Cyke is looking at in the 'still on the fence' panel?
i also like that Scott isn't looking at it as a break, but as one group focusing on different fronts. They aren't enemies, but believe they should be focusing on different things.
Interesting! Culturally speaking, it still doesn't really work because our ideas of "sexy" for men and women just aren't equivalent, but at least your example shows an *inkling* of what it might look like if male heroes were drawn for sex appeal first and foremost - I mean, at least it looks like somewhat like something someone might conceivably find sexy, rather than a grotesque joke like most of the role reversal pics do.
The ones that I feel miss the mark widest are the ones which try to draw male bodies in female postures, but inadvertently end up drawing the same old female bodies in female postures, just with a few male characteristics grafted on.
Actually, the pic in this post is a good example - those are not like any male asses I've ever seen. They are just... just too big and round-y. But I guess it proves something about our discomfort with sexualised men, if the guy trying to make that very point is unable to actually draw a sexualised *male* ass?
Well, Tony's pose there is a copy of a Spider-Woman pose from a specific pin-up, so presumably it is what an artist found to be a sexy pose for a woman - and I certainly find it a sexy pose for a man.
The main difference is the musculature, and Tony's hips aren't as curvy.
When I said "it looks somewhat like something someone might conceivably find sexy", I meant specifically that it looks like something that could be sexy even to someone *male-attracted.* I mean, most of the poses in typical role-reversal pics are taken from actual pictures of heroines, it's just that some 'female' poses really don't work well on men without some serious tweaking
I don't find the pic you posted sexy myself even though I do like some traditionally 'feminine' poses on men, but I can understand why you do.
I... don't follow what you mean by male-attracted? Attracted to males? It's a well-done picture of an attractive man in a sexualised pose, so presumably a decent percentage of people attracted to men would find it sexy?
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 03:51 pm (UTC)Blue steel, indeed.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 03:55 pm (UTC)Is that Rogue that Cyke is looking at in the 'still on the fence' panel?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:06 pm (UTC)It is -
http://www.newsarama.com/php/multim
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:09 pm (UTC)But poor Rogue! This must be like losing her second family, all over again, no matter what she chooses.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:16 pm (UTC)http://magickmaker.deviantart.com/galle
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 04:59 pm (UTC)...But I've never seen that.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:24 pm (UTC)Bwahahahaha! This will teach ya, nerds!
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:43 pm (UTC)The ones that I feel miss the mark widest are the ones which try to draw male bodies in female postures, but inadvertently end up drawing the same old female bodies in female postures, just with a few male characteristics grafted on.
Actually, the pic in this post is a good example - those are not like any male asses I've ever seen. They are just... just too big and round-y. But I guess it proves something about our discomfort with sexualised men, if the guy trying to make that very point is unable to actually draw a sexualised *male* ass?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:45 pm (UTC)You are a good obliging sort of fellow when it comes to things like this. ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 05:48 pm (UTC)The main difference is the musculature, and Tony's hips aren't as curvy.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 06:01 pm (UTC)I don't find the pic you posted sexy myself even though I do like some traditionally 'feminine' poses on men, but I can understand why you do.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-28 06:03 pm (UTC)