espanolbot (
espanolbot) wrote in
scans_daily2011-12-07 23:31
Entry tags:
Nightwing: Dick and other Cringeworthy Comicbook Moments
Warning for nudity, sexism, racism and a horrible instant of "slut shaming".
From the second Nightwing Annual from 2007, here's Dick and Babara's first meeting following the events of the Killing Joke.


Shouldn't the kissing panel me more "Mfffffhhhhh" than "shh"?
Jennifer Walters at the receiving end of one of the worst "slut shamings" in Marvel comicbooks.


Context: the Leader is arguing that gamma radiation poisoning makes people not responsible for their actions, which is the logic used to excuse Dr Banner for the Hulk's frequent rampages, so legally his megalomaniac tendencies aren't his fault either. As more evidence of this, he has his lawyer bring up a full list of the people Jennifer slept with as She-Hulk versus ones as herself to be entered as evidence of how gamma radiation effects her judgement, or something.
Legal explanation or not, it still seems to be as about as liable in court as that time in Veronica Mars where a defence lawyer uses Mars' confidential medical records to damage her statement.
Wonder Woman had the patience of a saint in the old days...

Come to think of it, so must have Sue...

And Kathy Kane...

The Beast appears to be either a master of sarcasm, or he's trying to spare Jean's feelings.

Oh, Billy, no! Bad idea! Bad idea! No stop!

*facepalm* Editors, you're not helping!

Up Next, depending on if it's in the public domain, I'll be analysing this,

It's a terrible comic both in ways that should be obvious, and ways that aren't.
If it's not in the public domain, I'll be doing a special on Jack Chick instead.
From the second Nightwing Annual from 2007, here's Dick and Babara's first meeting following the events of the Killing Joke.


Shouldn't the kissing panel me more "Mfffffhhhhh" than "shh"?
Jennifer Walters at the receiving end of one of the worst "slut shamings" in Marvel comicbooks.


Context: the Leader is arguing that gamma radiation poisoning makes people not responsible for their actions, which is the logic used to excuse Dr Banner for the Hulk's frequent rampages, so legally his megalomaniac tendencies aren't his fault either. As more evidence of this, he has his lawyer bring up a full list of the people Jennifer slept with as She-Hulk versus ones as herself to be entered as evidence of how gamma radiation effects her judgement, or something.
Legal explanation or not, it still seems to be as about as liable in court as that time in Veronica Mars where a defence lawyer uses Mars' confidential medical records to damage her statement.
Wonder Woman had the patience of a saint in the old days...

Come to think of it, so must have Sue...

And Kathy Kane...

The Beast appears to be either a master of sarcasm, or he's trying to spare Jean's feelings.

Oh, Billy, no! Bad idea! Bad idea! No stop!

*facepalm* Editors, you're not helping!

Up Next, depending on if it's in the public domain, I'll be analysing this,

It's a terrible comic both in ways that should be obvious, and ways that aren't.
If it's not in the public domain, I'll be doing a special on Jack Chick instead.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
On the other hand, people are also getting more aware of the fact that it isn't right.
Think of it this way: in the 1940s/50s, a comic like, say, Tarot, witch of the black rose would have engendered a lynch mob -- but for "indecency" and "pornography" and "loose morals attempting to lead us astray" because even so much as thinking about a woman in sexual terms when you weren't married or planning to marry her was sinful and wrong, because a woman's body should at all times be fully covered and proper.
Nowadays, it draws criticism because it's blatantly exploitative (and because of its lousy art and worse writing).
So yes, progress, of a sort.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Also if this is obvious i'm sorry, i have been writing papers for the last few days... my brain is pretty near to mush)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I think so.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Wheras in Veronica Mars, Aaron Echolls lawyer brought up Veronica's medical records. It was illegal for the lawyer to have even seen those records, and doubly so to enter them as evidence. That should've sparked an instant mistrial by the judge and charges brought against the defense attorney.
The fact that you can argue that that wasn't even the biggest WTF moment of that entire trial tells you what a clusterfuck it was.
ETA: I've only ever seen the Nightwing scene from the "afterglow" on. Seeing the lead-up makes Dick look like and even bigger... well, dick.
no subject
She never had to be worried about her secret identity.
"Diana can't possibly be Wonder Woman! Women are too dumb and weak to be strong and smart like Wonder Woman!"
no subject
no subject
It makes me like Dick and Babs as a couple even less.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
GATEKEEPING - it's a woman's job.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
The Nightwing one made me go "Oh, they are so cute, oh that is just so wonderful, oh that is... FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
no subject
no subject
We are still much more likely to view sex as a need for men, and one that is more or less separate from their moral character. Whereas in the case that you're talking about, it seems pretty clear that they aren't just trying to argue that sex is something a grieving widow wouldn't usually want* - they are trying to use the amount and perceived deviance of the sex (i.e. the threesome) as proof of what a weird and nasty and morally dubious woman she is.
The disturbing thing is that to many people that type of 'evidence' would be all too persuasive. They would be disgusted enough by the idea of a woman acting so far out from her prescribed role that they wouldn't need to hear anything else.
In effect, it could be argued that they are trying to shift the focus from the crime of murder to the crime of being a slut. Because once they've convinced the jury that she's guilty of the latter, it's much easier to convince them of the former as well.
*which is actually a very contentious claim in itself. We're well familiar with the concept of 'drowning your sorrows'; isn't the idea of taking solace in sex quite similar?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Slightly. Very, very slightly. In that case the woman was the one getting married, and her old boyfriend had come over before the wedding to pick up some of his stuff that had been uncovered while she got ready to move into her new husband's home. He later confessed to a mutual friend, who threatened to personally kill him if he ever mentioned it to anyone again (and risked ruining their friends' happy marriage in the process).
The moral of the story, as told to me years later and an ocean away by the mutual friend was, "Some men are irredeemable assholes, and this is how you can tell".
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Essentially, the plot is about a German girl that's a Nazi, but eventually (I don't remember how, its' been ages since I read it.) rejects Nazism and embraces Jesus as her savior.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Mod note!
I can see where you're coming from, that you're speaking hypothetically and how it began as relevant to the OP's scans, but I'm gonna put my mod hat on for a second and ask that you leave this thread to lie before it accidentally falls into slut shaming of it's own. Can do?
Cheers.
Re: Mod note!
no subject
no subject
Totally adding this one to my HANK PYM IS A WIFESBEATER file
no subject