Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 08:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 04:45 pm (UTC)What I'm concerned about is how the writers will balance the aforementioned realism and danger with avoiding constant deus ex machina moments like "Batman shows up" or "Superman tosses the bad guy into orbit".
no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 02:14 pm (UTC)The guy should, arguably, be much more powerful, but I think he's scaled down because he's a Batman foe.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 05:13 pm (UTC)I also read that comic where Karlo-face absorbs Wonder Woman who is herself a clay construct given life, and I liked the creative use of his abilities and the connection of clay but at the same time it was a headscratching moment for me.
Aren't all Clayfaces the victim of some kind of chemical that turns them into a mass of shapeshifting cells? Unless Karlo got his powers from being say, a magical earth elemental, I couldn't understand how his abilities would be able to affect Wonder Woman's clay body. Then again I get the same reaction every time magic beats science or science beats magic for the purposes of the plot.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 06:02 pm (UTC)In fact, the only seriously legitimate Clayface defeat I like is the psychological one Batman performs at the end of Feat of Clay, in BTAS.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 06:35 pm (UTC)Apparently one Clayface is the offspring of two other Clayfaces and another Clayface got powers by injecting a sample of the Hagen-Clayface.
There's quite a crazy pedigree here...
God do I love comics :D
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 05:03 am (UTC)Ahh, I see what you did there.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 08:02 am (UTC)Okay, I know the context, but come ON! ;-)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 09:02 am (UTC)Just checking, but...
Date: 2012-02-16 11:18 am (UTC)Re: Just checking, but...
Date: 2012-02-16 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-16 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 02:18 pm (UTC)