Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
Re: Santorum
Date: 2012-03-19 08:57 am (UTC)Re: Santorum
Date: 2012-03-21 01:49 am (UTC)I love how DOMA was foisted on us by a Democrat in the first place. And now a Bush-era appointee has ruled that it's <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/02/22/430779/breaking-bush-appointee-finds-doma-unconstitutional/?mobile=nc>unconstitutional</a>. Obama will mine people's understandable revulsion towards Santorum, et al. for more money, more votes, more cred, and then he'll spend the next four years dithering and expecting accolades for it. I'd bet my last five bucks on that.
Re: Santorum
Date: 2012-03-21 01:13 pm (UTC)Garry Trudeau portrayed Clinton as a floating waffle in "Doonsbury." Do "waffle" and "dithering" mean the same thing?
Re: Santorum
Date: 2012-03-21 04:02 pm (UTC)Yes, "waffle" and "dither" mean the same thing, and in retrospect, I was too easy on Obama. He's not dithering. He's willfully stringing along millions of American citizens because, deep down, he doesn't care about them. He used them as a stepping stone to advance his own fortunes and he will use them again as many times as he possibly can. It's the same shit Democrats do over and over again to their supposed base, and it's why I stopped voting for any of the self-serving fuckers years ago.
But as long as Santorum and his ilk are out there, Democrats always have a built-in means of bullying the people they screw. Hey, vote for us! At least we don't call you poopy names to your face!!
Re: Santorum
Date: 2012-03-21 01:51 am (UTC)