sherkahn: (Larfleeze)sherkahn ([personal profile] sherkahn) wrote in [community profile] scans_daily,
@ 2012-04-25 09:36 am UTC
Entry tags:char: human torch/johnny storm, char: spider-man/peter parker, creator: jonathan hickman, title: ff
We saw the preview earlier, and at times I can hear The Hangover movie theme playing in the background as I read this fun issue, and at times I hear "How do you solve a problem like Maria?"

yeah, I'm weird like that.

So many choice pages to post, but I have already posted 2, so I can only do 2 more.








Yes, that is Mary Jane Watson getting funky with Johnny Storm.

(Read 81 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

whitesycamore: (pic#913785)


[personal profile] whitesycamore
2012-04-26 09:23 pm UTC (link)
If the King is seen to flout his own law because it inconveniences him, then there goes his much of his authority, and he's no better than any despot. ("Well, I didn't vote for him")

So... therefore he should burn his wife because *not* burning his wife inconveniences him in the sense of undermining his authority? That decision would seem to be based on pragmatics, not morality--unless he was operating under a sort of Kohlberg law-and-order morality.

I personally think that if you don't burn women alive then you are a lot better than despots who do. And a lot worse than an unfaithful wife, for that matter.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread) 


biod: Cute Galactus (Cute Galactus)


[personal profile] biod
2012-04-27 02:05 pm UTC (link)
In some versions Arthur holds the hope that Lancelot will save her, since he had to uphold the law... Which makes the deaths of all the people Lancelot had to kill to do so extra unnecessary, but what are ya gonna do?

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent) 


(Read 81 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)