Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:19 pm (UTC)Wanting to turn a teenage girl into a person of mass destruction to bully the world into complying with a list of demands seems like more of a Dr Doom plot than a heroic one. Though this was also the guy whose response to finding a girl programmed into being a murderer by a government programme that has repeatedly targetted his people was "Whelp, she's be a good addition to my covert death squad!".
There's being determined to protect your people in the face of repeated attempts to kill them, and then there's viewing children as being expendable on the road to your goals.
The ends justifies the means GENERALLY isn't a philosophy associated with the good guys, Scott. If it was, then the methods that Stark used to try and keep the general public safe during and after the Civil War wouldn't have been as contested as they were.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:25 pm (UTC)Based on their previous dealings with Phoenix, Jean and Rachel in particular, assuming that the Phoenix host WOULD be a weapon of mass destruction is a major assumption.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:40 pm (UTC)I can understand people saying that the Phoenix was generally a force for good but that kind of loses weight when the "one bad thing" it did was killing billions of innocents.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 09:11 pm (UTC)Rachel (and then Jean herself) operated as the Phoenix for years with no significant damage done and are probably a better exemplar of what the Phoenix can be than anything else.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 09:48 pm (UTC)I honestly don't know what to say about this crossover because how out of character everyone is being. I'm sensing imminent fuster-cluck and cringing preemptively as I watch this go down.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-05 07:18 pm (UTC)Sounds like a Harvey comic. (:
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:32 pm (UTC)Then again, she did cause some kind of repowering. We call them the 5 Lights.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:37 pm (UTC)If I were in a position of power in the Marvel universe, I'd try to compromise by allowing Hope and the Phoenix to merge, only off-world with a failsafe in case their "blind faith" ends up killing the world instead. And if she's not a means for reempowering and just another PMD... then get Reed Richards or someone to rig the spacestation the merge occurs on to fall into a black hole or something, just to be safe.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 08:45 pm (UTC)Not a bad plan. Too bad both team were busy holding their Idiot ball.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 03:17 am (UTC)But then Scott gets angry and Steve gets stupid and Scott gets stupid too and then everyone just starts beating the shit out of each other and you know the rest.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-05 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-02 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 03:22 am (UTC)In the case that Hope harnesses the power of the Phoenix and controls it and powers up a lot of mutants....
Will she also have control over them like she did with the 5 lights? (Is Scott aware that she can control them? BTW?)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 05:16 am (UTC)It's a little frightening when you think about it.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-04 03:22 am (UTC)Oh man I can kind of see where Bishop is coming from, even though I am not that into the whole killing Hope thing.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-04 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-03 10:52 am (UTC)Scott seems to be aware, he doesn't seem to care a lot.