Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 07:16 pm (UTC)sorry that made giggle... and think of an 80's guitar riff :D
no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:11 pm (UTC)The art does reinforce this as the bullet isn't dented as it would be with a ricochet.
It's a bit much, but I guess it's feasible.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-07 07:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 07:18 pm (UTC)and i admit i thought "Awe Eros you are sweet, misguided, but sweet"
about not wanting Clark to break Diana's heart....
though him catching the magic bullet.... (both another song riff and useful kitchen product) annoyed me...
no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 09:24 pm (UTC)Yes, I understand what the scene is supposed to signify, that Superman is showing Diana that he's making a decision of his own free will to love her in spite of his fears about hurting her. That's all fine and dandy. However, as this very issue shows, Superman is still vulnerable to the effects of magic. And Eros' bullets are of very powerful magic considering how we've seen they're capable of literally penetrating through Diana's unbreakable bracelets. And yet somehow, Superman is capable of catching a literal magic bullet just like he would an regular one? Sure, he's got enough super speed to be able to catch it, but that bullet should have gone through his hand. Or at the very least pierced his skin and drew blood. And IMO, if a writer has to violate the pre-established rules of a fictional universe that have been set-up well in advance in order to make the story work, then that writer is doing something wrong.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-07 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 11:22 pm (UTC)Although I did like when she said, "Let the truth set you free!" It sounds a bit like a slogan. (Red Bull gives you wings!)
no subject
Date: 2013-02-07 11:12 am (UTC)John 8:32: (KJV): And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
no subject
Date: 2013-02-06 11:47 pm (UTC)I don't know even with importing characters from Azzarello's WW, I still think this "romance" could have been filled with Generic Female Superheroine X and its all for SUPERMAN'S benefit. What role is WW (the dominant superheroine in all fiction) playing here other than as "Superman's Girlfriend" (to use the title of an old DC book starring Lois)? I still don't see it.
First Page
Date: 2013-02-07 12:42 am (UTC)Re: First Page
Date: 2013-02-07 02:17 am (UTC)Re: First Page
Date: 2013-02-07 03:41 pm (UTC)