Superman says, "Bananas!"
Jul. 4th, 2009 11:54 pm
I promised
The cover, which did catch my eye:

Aaaaand, here's the context. Or the setup, anyway. The plot could pretty much be any characters, and it's... well it's Bob Haney. Really long, all over the place story. Ghost of John and Martha, Superman stands in as newsman for Clark, Batman visits a geek show, etc., etc.
Lots of it revolving around 'New Metropolis'. Anybody know if it ever showed up in another story?

Clark's 'freed the slaves' comment/joke about salary what? Bruce's: 'siphon off excess population' what?
Also: Ever hear of urban sprawl, 1976 World's Finest Comic?

Clothes. In a pool. Look like 'a guy struggling to swim'. Okay.

From World's Finest #235, Art by Dick Dillin and John Calnan, Story by Bob Haney
A whole bunch of other stuff happens, but I think Bruce and Clark on a date

And this panel are enough.


He ain't no hollaback girl!
Date: 2009-07-05 05:24 am (UTC)...on that note, I need sleep.
Re: He ain't no hollaback girl!
Date: 2009-07-05 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 07:00 am (UTC)Also: Why are they holding a business meeting in a gym? (I know, I know, Earth Logic, booooo, etc., but really now.)
Ahhh, another chance to use my Bromance icon...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:15 pm (UTC)Ahhh. I *love* your Bromance icon.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 09:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 02:12 pm (UTC)It really, really threw me.
Just offhand, here you have it, let's listen in on the 'real' thoughts of Bruce Wayne and Clark Kent. And be afraid.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-07 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-07 04:18 am (UTC)To me it smacks of a certain amount of elitism.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-07 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-06 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-07 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-06 11:46 pm (UTC)Other than that, Clark and Bruce look ADORABLE.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-06 11:50 pm (UTC)Aren't they, though?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-07 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-07 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-06 11:53 pm (UTC)