ext_396464: (Banned)http://xdoop.insanejournal.com/ ([identity profile] xdoop.insanejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] scans_daily,
@ 2009-07-11 01:36 pm UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Entry tags:char: green goblin/norman osborn, char: sub-mariner/namor mckenzie, creator: jae lee, creator: leonard kirk, creator: paul cornell, event: utopia, publisher: marvel comics, title: dark x-men


This is from Dark X-Men: The Beginning #1. It's by Paul Cornell and Leonard Kirk.







(Read 50 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)


[identity profile] mcspakypants.insanejournal.com
2009-07-11 09:37 pm UTC (link)
When I talked to Matt Fraction at HeroesCon about the "First Mutant Namor" thing he said it would be addressed in Utopia, and probably debunked.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread) 



[identity profile] bariman1987.insanejournal.com
2009-07-12 06:49 am UTC (link)
Namor can't be the first mutant. He's not even a century old, and there's been many mutants older than that. Wolverine, for instance, was born in the early 1800s.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread) 


ext_396464: (Banned)


[identity profile] xdoop.insanejournal.com
2009-07-12 11:34 am UTC (link)
I think they meant "first mutant" as he was created first.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent) 



[identity profile] jackissuperfly.insanejournal.com
2009-07-13 02:20 am UTC (link)
In-universe, he's the first mutant of the modern age, the first mutant in the mutant baby-boom. (Technically he's not, but let's pretend.) And you could make a pretty good argument that he's the first Big Name Mutant, which is definitely the case: the Marvelverse 1930's had quite a few superheroes, but by this point, all anyone remembers is Namor and Torch, and Torch is a robot.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent) 


(Read 50 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)