Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively,
Please read the community ethos and rules before posting or commenting.
Links
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 11:58 am (UTC)The best part here is the 'I was under oath, what could I do?' part from Bruce. It's such a great statement about the character.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 07:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 11:50 am (UTC)Fishy
Date: 2009-08-19 06:38 am (UTC)Re: Fishy
Date: 2009-08-19 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 08:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 08:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 11:57 am (UTC)Jury duty selection is normally quite random and being called up for jury duty doesn't even mean, necessarily, that you'll be called for jury selection. Of the three times I've been called, I've only served on a jury once. Many large urban locations now let you just call to see if you're even actually needed that particular day. If you look at the jury roles in Los Angeles, you'll see plenty of famous names.
The main reason you don't see many powerful and rich CEOs on the jury roles is two-fold: first off, they can legitimately make a case that they couldn't serve on a jury without having an adverse effect on their job and their company. Second, many cases would automatically make them a poor choice during jury selection - any business case holds the chance to be prejudicial for that CEO, for example, and the chance for a conflict of interest can be great.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 09:32 am (UTC)God, DCAU is so great.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 12:37 pm (UTC)By serving on the jury, he's denying a man his basic right to a fair trial.
I mean sure, it's depicted as fine here because the guy is guilty and apparently has a hair trigger, but Batman is still actively working against the principle of innocent until proven guilty. What he's doing is really deeply immoral.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-19 01:43 pm (UTC)And is it just me or do Tim's eyes almost look scared as he's kicking the guy?