Upcoming stuff...
Aug. 20th, 2009 05:56 pm...from Secret Six and Wonder Woman.
Both from The Source.
First, the cover to Secret Six #16.

For the linkaphobes and uncertain, that's Black Alice.
Then two pages from Wonder Woman #36.

Both from The Source.
First, the cover to Secret Six #16.

For the linkaphobes and uncertain, that's Black Alice.
Then two pages from Wonder Woman #36.


no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 02:42 am (UTC)It looks like the artist either A) Found a chopped up model photo off of Photoshop Disasters (probably footwear?), or B) Did his own cut/paste before his paint-over. This is why you need to not directly copy photos to do your work, kids. :P
At first pass the concept and color is good, he/she just needs to learn some anatomy stat.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 05:26 am (UTC)I'm not saying he didn't "ref" the pose, I'm saying it's obvious (now even more so with that link) that he uses photos as a crutch for his lack of anatomy/lighting knowledge. So when he picks up ref that's been poorly re-touched, or he chops it up to suit his needs, he's got no clue how wrong everything is. I'm all understanding that unskilled art comes out when you're learning, but this dude is getting paid by a major company. It boggles my mind.
I was always taught to send sequential pages to publishers 'cause they had all the awesome cover artists they ever needed, but this. This reminds me why I question that often.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:35 am (UTC)http://danielluvisiart.blogspot.com/2009/0
As for why he has this job? I'd think this (http://adonihs.deviantart.com/journal/22365368/) was a big part since a month later he started working with DC.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 10:24 am (UTC)I don't see how his post was a big part either. I mean, there might be some explanation if he knew someone inside, but obviously that was not the case. If he went the SDCC route, then GOD HELP US ALL since Marvel/DC only take unsolicts by drop box, from which they choose peeps for reviews. That means they choose him cold call and that's...*sigh*
Yah, okay. Put "do serious cover samples" on my projects to-do list.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:10 pm (UTC)I still love Giganta's new costume. Fuctional, stylish, and non-panty-flashing, it's a win-win!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:25 pm (UTC)Good to see some pagetime for a rogue who needs it, too. I hope this is more than the incidental namecheck-pummel-dismiss she usually gets. And maybe that it involves Ryan in some way. I miss that dude.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 02:33 am (UTC)So, so much seconded. I miss Ryan. I miss Giganta and Ryan. They should totally have an awkward, uneasy team-up date. It would be glorious.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:34 pm (UTC)I wish other comicbook artists would take note. Heroines can look sexy and NOT look like a casting call from Rock of Love.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 10:40 pm (UTC)What's with the graves -- Scandal and Bane have to bunk up?
I am glad to see Giganta has pants on.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:23 pm (UTC)For a second, I thought that was Cheetah going for a REALLY WIERD STYLE.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-20 11:55 pm (UTC)Though when Wondy herself appeared there was this attempt to make Giganta some huge epic rival whose presence can cause Diana to totally go berserk, something not remotely justified by their history; if I had to name one real problem I had with Simone's run it's how she frequently attempts to retroactively impose character history (Etta being her closest friend, for example). Diana and Giganta have met like three times, and she's never been much more than a joke.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 01:17 am (UTC)At the same time though I kind of fear for her.
Gail brought Tarantula in only to end up killing her and had an arc that had Artemis get tortured (though later freed her and had her bloodying up many a captor). I trust in Gail but I'm wondering what Alice could do with the Six, she doesn't have a connection unless she and Jeanette go at it for some reason.
Not sure how to feel aside from saying that cover is PURTY.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 02:32 am (UTC)I don't care much about Black Alice though so eh.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 03:02 am (UTC)It's all about tone. Something like Carol Danvers' torture in MS MARVEL, or Temi's recent rape threat in SECRET SIX, passes the test because of how the supposed victims reacted - specifically, not like victims. There was never any question, to my mind, that no matter what happened to Artemis, much, much worse was going to happen to whoever did it, and she herself wasn't going to be broken by it. She's defiant, calm, and dangerous; there's no trace of fear or helplessness in her, no sense that they have any power over her beyond the simple, very temporary, physical fact of her chains. She reacts like a male character would, and like any hero should, with confidence and control and effective forward action (taunting the guy into hitting her, which stopped him pawing her).
Brutalizing a character is fine. It's required by the genre. It's just that female characters are generally victimized instead, which is not okay. I typically trust Gail to know the difference, which means, yeah, I'm not nearly as skittish about that kind of set-up when she's writing as I would be most other comic authors. It's more about her cred than her gender, though; Rucka's got a good track record too, for example, so I'm not real concerned about Batwoman's apparently unrevealed "tragic past," and I was never skeeved out by Chase's kidnapping or the border abductions in MANHUNTER, so Andreyko gets similar leeway with me.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 04:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 04:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 04:59 am (UTC)It's the only way I can begin to understand what's going on there.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:01 am (UTC)Look at it closely. It's choppy! It's just such a good composition (legs aside) that you almost don't notice it.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 05:31 am (UTC)I wish Anon hadn't linked me to his DA page. It's Epic bad for someone being paid to be a cover artist for a big company. I was enjoying my ignorance.
*Goes to ease the pain with some James Jean covers.*
no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-23 03:39 am (UTC)For a second, I was hoping it was Abby Scutio.
I was really, really hoping it was Abby Scutio.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 09:32 am (UTC)