I mean for Fuck's Sake, Tony's paid his dues. Although honestly, most of Tony's problem was poor editorial control with different writers portraying him differently. It matters less with Osborn (especially since he's being portrayed as a dick intentionally, just with varying levels of competence). Tony swung between brutish thug to conflicted humanitarian in the space of the same month, depending on what title he was on.
Re: I dunno man
I mean for Fuck's Sake, Tony's paid his dues. Although honestly, most of Tony's problem was poor editorial control with different writers portraying him differently. It matters less with Osborn (especially since he's being portrayed as a dick intentionally, just with varying levels of competence). Tony swung between brutish thug to conflicted humanitarian in the space of the same month, depending on what title he was on.