As stated below, one of the clear points in our community ethos: Calling out other members or creators for discriminatory or oppressive behavior is encouraged for the good of the community.
Please do not tell other members to calm down or police their tone.
So...shouldn't bluefall be the one talked to for posting an angry post about the issue? Isn't blue's post being oppressive by being angry about the story? It's not even a comment that blue should calm down as blue's opinion doesn't matter, it's that the story clearly doesn't matter as it's going to be retconned soon.
Isn't blue's post being oppressive by being angry about the story?
I don't think you know what oppressive means.
Are you seriously trying to argue that bluefall is oppressing someone by posting 'fuck everything' on a comics community? Who? Is she oppressing... DC? You? Me? Superman?
Maybe not so much oppressive as seriously trying to sway people into being angry about it. It's essentially a post saying I'm pissed and YOU should be pissed. If blue put an actual reason it wouldn't be a thing but as it is yeah, it's pretty extreme.
But saying someone else can't say a person should calm down is probably more oppressive than anything, it's well, anybody's first reaction.
Calling out other members or creators for discriminatory or oppressive behavior is encouraged for the good of the community.
Diana's treatment as a character has been very poor, and this is bad. It's also sexist. Sexism is oppressive.
By making a post about this sexism, bluefall is calling out discrimatory or oppressive behaviour.
Posts like bluefall's are encouraged under community rules.
Got that?
But saying someone else can't say a person should calm down is probably more oppressive than anything, it's well, anybody's first reaction.
1) I don't think you know what oppressive means. 2) It wasn't my first reaction, stop generalizing from yourself. 3) If you want a comics blog where telling women to calm down and stop getting upset about sexism is accepted (encouraged, even!) there's... well, most of them. You can't have this one. That's not oppression.
To be fair, Blue didn't make a post about sexism. Blue posted a few comic scans and said they were mad, and that's it. The discussion of sexism was started by other people.
Just wondering, do you know what tone policing is, how common it is used against someone finds something problematic and oppressive in the way it was presented, and how it frames any narrative of dissent into being over emotional and lacking in a calm, logical assessment?
Well yes, that happens everywhere. It's one thing to be angry about something and blurt it out, but if they don't put it in a good way (IE fully explain) it'll just be torn to shreds and have the person painted in a bad light.
But saying someone else can't say a person should calm down is probably more oppressive than anything, it's well, anybody's first reaction.
In addition: more oppressive than anything
I don't think you know what a sense of proportion is, either. Not being allowed to tell a woman to calm down when she swears at sexist comics is not 'more oppressive than anything'.
I can't imagine how you thought that was a reasonable thing to say. Sexism, racism, homophobia! Ethnic cleansing, starvation, silencing of the press! Trade sanctions, IMF, rigged elections! Step aside! There's a new oppression on the block, and it is...
Not being allowed to dismiss the concerns of women.
In a comics community.
On the internet.
I bet Martin Luther King, Emmeline Pankhurst and Harvey Milk feel pretty silly now, wasting their lives like that when they could have been fighting for the right to tell women to calm down. Why, with their combined efforts, we might dare to dream of telling women not to worry their pretty little heads about sexism, it's no big deal!
I mean when you're angry and people you barely know tell you to calm down, you typically take that as what, earnest, good-natured advice? This is something that isn't pretty much universally recognizable as a dick move? Really?
I think important to note in all this is the second half of the sentence, which has largely been forgotten. The reason behind "calming down" was not a belittling of your sentiments, but a joke that it was all going to be retconned anyway. In other words, the poster was making an attempt to comment on DC Comics, not you, or whether your problems with the issue were legitimate. Clearly things would have gone better if they had posted "Don't worry" instead of "calm down" but I think the intention was the same. My two cents.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:34 pm (UTC)... apparently not reading what they're writing isn't unique to DC this week.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 11:21 pm (UTC)My sincere apologies, that was not my intent.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 11:30 pm (UTC)Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 10:48 pm (UTC)Please do not tell other members to calm down or police their tone.
Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:03 pm (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:13 pm (UTC)I don't think you know what oppressive means.
Are you seriously trying to argue that
Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:17 pm (UTC)But saying someone else can't say a person should calm down is probably more oppressive than anything, it's well, anybody's first reaction.
Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:23 pm (UTC)Calling out other members or creators for discriminatory or oppressive behavior is encouraged for the good of the community.
Diana's treatment as a character has been very poor, and this is bad. It's also sexist. Sexism is oppressive.
By making a post about this sexism,
Posts like
Got that?
But saying someone else can't say a person should calm down is probably more oppressive than anything, it's well, anybody's first reaction.
1) I don't think you know what oppressive means.
2) It wasn't my first reaction, stop generalizing from yourself.
3) If you want a comics blog where telling women to calm down and stop getting upset about sexism is accepted (encouraged, even!) there's... well, most of them. You can't have this one. That's not oppression.
Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-10 12:56 am (UTC)The rest seems pretty much spot on, though.
Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:39 pm (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:49 pm (UTC)Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:54 pm (UTC)In addition: more oppressive than anything
I don't think you know what a sense of proportion is, either. Not being allowed to tell a woman to calm down when she swears at sexist comics is not 'more oppressive than anything'.
I can't imagine how you thought that was a reasonable thing to say. Sexism, racism, homophobia! Ethnic cleansing, starvation, silencing of the press! Trade sanctions, IMF, rigged elections! Step aside! There's a new oppression on the block, and it is...
Not being allowed to dismiss the concerns of women.
In a comics community.
On the internet.
I bet Martin Luther King, Emmeline Pankhurst and Harvey Milk feel pretty silly now, wasting their lives like that when they could have been fighting for the right to tell women to calm down. Why, with their combined efforts, we might dare to dream of telling women not to worry their pretty little heads about sexism, it's no big deal!
Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-11 03:02 am (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:32 pm (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:46 pm (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:49 pm (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-09 11:21 pm (UTC)Oppression is "the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner."
Anger is "a strong feeling of displeasure and belligerence aroused by a wrong."
They are two very different concepts. Some of us know this from direct experience.
Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-10 03:49 am (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-10 07:17 am (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-10 08:04 am (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-10 08:11 am (UTC)Re: Mod Note
Date: 2011-02-10 08:32 am (UTC)I can see not taking it the right way but oppressive?
Really?
Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:Re: Mod Note
From:no subject
Date: 2011-03-03 03:01 pm (UTC)