![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sherkahn posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
scans_dailyFollowing up on brooms post, ComicBookResources one more page from the preview.
... and Quentin Quire will be Brad Pitt.... ok, maybe not Brad.... Rory Culkin.
Quentin... you HAD to say it...
brooms post, ComicBookResources one more page from the preview.... and Quentin Quire will be Brad Pitt.... ok, maybe not Brad.... Rory Culkin.
Quentin... you HAD to say it...
no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 04:04 pm (UTC)Hell, if I ran a casino in that universe, even one on earth, I'd make a point of hiring people who can watch for that kind of thing, and invest in a lot of power nullifiers while I was at it.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 04:23 pm (UTC)I think Logan's betting on it. Quentin will get himself exposed/busted, and that Logan will have to gamble on his own solo against a "big fish"/casino. That way he gets more people betting against him with more money, and he gets more money if he wins on his own.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 06:19 pm (UTC)Personally I think this whole mission is more about Logan trying to get a feel for what Quentin is really capable of more than anything else. I mean didn't Logan flat out say a few issues back that none of them have any idea what Quentin's real power set is other than TP and the occasional TK?
no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 08:05 pm (UTC)Should someone ever say that, you are allowed to smack that person.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-17 08:28 pm (UTC)"Did you have to say that? 'There's no turning back?' That's almost as bad as 'Nothing could possibly go wrong' or 'This'll be the best Christmas Walford's ever had.' "
no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-19 05:41 am (UTC)No, no. You should be allowed to use the person as cannon fodder or as a meat shield. It makes his last words so much more satisfyingly ironic. XD
no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-18 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-20 04:26 am (UTC)