nefrekeptah: (Default)

[personal profile] nefrekeptah 2012-05-04 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't see how this is a parody. I mean, yeah, obviously the name is a parody, but I don't recognize who the characters are supposed to be imitating, nor do I see how "stopping people from releasing rabbits" is supposed to be mocking what the Avengers do.
okkult3000: (Default)

[personal profile] okkult3000 2012-05-05 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Nowadays, a work is a parody when the creator realizes it's not very good only after releasing it to the public. See also: the Spirit movie.
glprime: (Default)

[personal profile] glprime 2012-05-05 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
OH SNAP!

(and verily, thou speakest the truth)
yvonmukluk: (Default)

[personal profile] yvonmukluk 2012-05-05 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
'Nowadays'?

I'll have you know claiming a work a parody after its release dates back to at least space Mutiny.

Behold:http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ParodyRetcon

(I fail at html)
silverzeo: (Default)

Or better yet...

[personal profile] silverzeo 2012-05-05 11:22 am (UTC)(link)
Marville...
Or that Quagmire rapes Marge, she ends up liking it, and him killing off the Simpsons joke on the Family Guy...
auggie18: (Default)

Re: Or better yet...

[personal profile] auggie18 2012-05-06 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
In all fairness, I think Marville was a parody from the get go. That didn't stop it from being terrible, though.
icon_uk: (Default)

[personal profile] icon_uk 2012-05-05 09:47 am (UTC)(link)
I assume that it's taking the notion of a Government sponsored superteam performing acts which enforce those Government policies to the absurd extreme.

If it's a Government sponsored animal research facility then breaking into it is a Federal matter and the team could be called in.

It seems a mite heavy handed and it's not a title I'd follow but I'm pretty sure I've seen worse produced comics marketed during the 90's

[personal profile] cleome45 2012-05-05 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
The poor Nineties. They never get any respect. :p
icon_uk: (Default)

[personal profile] icon_uk 2012-05-05 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
As someone who remembers first hand the comics of the 70's onwards, there's a reason for that.

[personal profile] cleome45 2012-05-05 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I was checked out for most of the Nineties. Should I consider that a blessing?
mrstatham: (Default)

[personal profile] mrstatham 2012-05-06 10:49 am (UTC)(link)
Holofoil covers, guns, 'bad-girl' art and Liefeld. Four reasons out of the relative hundred or so I could pick out as to why the 90's sucked for comics. Though it *IS* incredibly important to note that not all 90's comics were bad, just the very prominent ones. It's not like there isn't shit being produced that's a complete waste of paper, and it's not like bad comics stopped being made as of December 31st 1999.