On the one hand...yay, more representation in comics and an Asian-American cretive team!
On the other, Cho is acting like a goddamn fratboy and half of that creative team is Frank Cho, who's not exactly been a shining exemplar of political correctness.
I love it. Its carrying on the whole Incredible Herc vibe. Also Cho is acting more like a teenage boy who know he looks good than a "movie" fratboy to me. Seeing a lot of appreciation for women of all body type but no misogyny.
Enh, I feel like that last part - regarding Cho's intentions - is not unlike a guy thinking he's being flattering when he tells a woman "I'm attracted to fat chicks", or similar. Cho draws women of different body types mostly for wank-fodder's sake, not for representation - and, evidenced by his constant "Outrage!" covers, apparently gets very upset and indignant when anyone calls him out on that fact.
I can't lie I love that stuff so many I am the wrong guy. I think its fine for certain books to be unabashed cheese/beefcake.
Harley Quinn, Grayson , Midnighter, etc. The only time cheesecake bother me is when it doesn't fit the tone of the story/scene. Greg Land's random pornfaces, antonmically improbable poses by the females in a Batman or JLA comic, that sort of thing.
This book just seems like good clean fun and I think there is a place for that.
Yeah, I thought he was just another guy who liked drawing the pretty ladies, of which there are obviously a bunch in comics, but then I made the mistake of looking at his blog.
Robbi Rodriguez, the co-creator of Spider-Gwen, kind of aggressively told him to knock it off when he drew the character in a suggestive pose. I wouldn't say he "threatened" him, though.
That specifically, but I got the sense he was generally sniping at anyone who dared criticise him - after all, it started out as that artist (the co-creator of Spider-Gwen) criticising him for drawing Spider-Gwen in the pose of that infamous Milo Manara Spider-Woman cover in order to troll people who criticised that cover.
It doesn't 'need' to be PC, but I'd probably enjoy this book much more if Frank Cho hadn't spent the last 6 months or so deliberately baiting feminists who (justifiably) criticised some of his art as being deliberately cheescakey.
It's like Marvel is deliberately putting some of the worst people on books featuring POCs as main characters (see also: Edmonson on Red Wolf).
And when men are complaining about how it's objectifying, then I suppose the two are the same thing. Honestly dudes in comics seem largely to be drawn to align with male power fantasies, only instead of titillation they're meant to be ideal physiques. There are rare exceptions (Dick Grayson is I believe the favoured example), but they're the exception rather than the rule. It's not a 1:1 thing.
When was the last time a man complained about being the art in comics objectifying his gender? Speaking as a man, I don't think I can recall an instance where that's the case. That doesn't mean women aren't being objectified. And Frank Cho's response to these criticisms really don't do him any favours.
There's a difference between doing so good-naturedly and with some courtesy - for instance, as much as I disagree with everything any GOP candidate stands for, I did kind-of admire Cruz' response the other day to Trump's accusation of being a "maniac", by self-deprecatingly posting the music video of the song of the same name on his twitter.
Whereas Cho's pieces just generally come off as spiteful and/or begging for attention/asking for a fight.
Amadeus Cho may be extremely intelligent, but he's never exactly been gifted with an abundance of common sense or restraint. Add that to the power of a Hulk, plus what appears to be a general lessening of inhibitions in that form, and you have a teenage guy who's definitely going to be obnoxious, annoying, and full of himself.
And it's obviously not going to end well for him. :)
It's long been my head-canon that being a Hulk drastically reduces inhibitions. In Bruce Banner, this is a problem because he's holding back psychological trauma, multiple personalities, and serious anger issues, but his cousin Jen doesn't have those issues, so being She-Hulk has only really changed her from a shy, mousy woman to an extrovert full of joie de vivre--her former self would never have gotten fired from a law firm for accidentally breaking a copier with her backside, or wrecking a conference room table in a fit of pique on her way out.
I'm pretty sure that's actual canon, though I can't remember just where it was established. Possibly in one of the She-Hulk series, where it was indeed specified that becoming She-Hulk loosened her inhibitions.
I was under the impression, reading it, that this was part of what being a Hulk is doing to Amadeus: rather than being enraged or extroverted, as per Bruce or Jennifer, Amadeus's Hulk side makes him an incorrigible flirt who's prone to not thinking. Instead of over-analyzing, he isn't analyzing at all, and is generally prone to doing the first thing that flies into his head.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 05:27 pm (UTC)On the other, Cho is acting like a goddamn fratboy and half of that creative team is Frank Cho, who's not exactly been a shining exemplar of political correctness.
Jury's still out.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 08:44 pm (UTC)Harley Quinn, Grayson , Midnighter, etc. The only time cheesecake bother me is when it doesn't fit the tone of the story/scene. Greg Land's random pornfaces, antonmically improbable poses by the females in a Batman or JLA comic, that sort of thing.
This book just seems like good clean fun and I think there is a place for that.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 10:59 am (UTC)It's like Marvel is deliberately putting some of the worst people on books featuring POCs as main characters (see also: Edmonson on Red Wolf).
no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 02:55 pm (UTC)When was the last time a man complained about being the art in comics objectifying his gender? Speaking as a man, I don't think I can recall an instance where that's the case. That doesn't mean women aren't being objectified. And Frank Cho's response to these criticisms really don't do him any favours.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 07:03 pm (UTC)Whereas Cho's pieces just generally come off as spiteful and/or begging for attention/asking for a fight.
no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 07:16 pm (UTC)And it's obviously not going to end well for him. :)
no subject
Date: 2015-12-16 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-17 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-12-17 02:36 am (UTC)Was that establishing it for Hulk-ism in general, or just that her Hulkform, in particular, was inhibition-light?
no subject
Date: 2015-12-15 09:37 pm (UTC)