No, but in the context of the thread, I was assuming your argument ran along the lines of "Islam fosters a uniquely evil brand of terrorism (probably because of all the brown people), unlike Christianity, which is universally enlightened and peaceful," and is that where we're going? Because I would love to be proved wrong here.
The only one acting shitty is you. You’re looking for an excuse to act offended.
Asking whether or not Christian suicide bombers are a thing is not a suggestion that Christian terrorism doesn’t exist nor does it suggest that Islamic terrorism is a result of skin pigmentation over religious ideology as you wrongly accused me of implying.
super_fly said that "the implication that teaming up islamic terrorists is the only way to get [Christians] to use suicide bomb tactics" was inaccurate.
In response to that I asked how many Christians have actually committed suicide bombings.
In response to that I asked how many Christians have actually committed suicide bombings.
What answer are you looking for, though? Is it "None"? Does that bolster a further argument of "Christians are not (as) inherently violent," as implied from super_fly's comment earlier? Because I linked examples of Christian violence earlier, and the response was "well, those aren't suicide bombings" and it's just like... is that supposed to make them less reprehensible, or...?
I suspect the mod hammer is going to come down on this conversation fairly soon, but for as much as you accused me earlier of making ignorant assumptions, all this is coming off as somewhat disingenuous in the light of post-9/11 Islamophobia.
You can infer whatever you want if you want an excuse to be outraged. There's plenty that can be said about the prevalence of Christian extremism in comparison to Islamic extremism but if I had wanted to say something about it I would have. I'm not one to mince words.
Walter: "So....my economic policies have completely tanked it to record lows, my attempts to terraform just made worse environmental damage and the kid I was pushing to take over the world is an unstable psychopath.
You know...if I didn't know better...I'd swear being the most brilliant man on Earth doesn't mean you're actually always right."
Ok but when you make that many people see clowns having sex there's a small chance at least one of them's at least going to be like, "Y'know - I'm a little bit into that."
no subject
They're all far more utterly fucking deranged than this in real life
I apologise to any right wing christians I made cross with this pun
Though personally I think I nailed it
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You're wrong.
It's cool, just don't make ignorant assumptions next time.
no subject
no subject
Asking whether or not Christian suicide bombers are a thing is not a suggestion that Christian terrorism doesn’t exist nor does it suggest that Islamic terrorism is a result of skin pigmentation over religious ideology as you wrongly accused me of implying.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
In response to that I asked how many Christians have actually committed suicide bombings.
That's it. There is no thesis.
no subject
What answer are you looking for, though? Is it "None"? Does that bolster a further argument of "Christians are not (as) inherently violent," as implied from super_fly's comment earlier? Because I linked examples of Christian violence earlier, and the response was "well, those aren't suicide bombings" and it's just like... is that supposed to make them less reprehensible, or...?
I suspect the mod hammer is going to come down on this conversation fairly soon, but for as much as you accused me earlier of making ignorant assumptions, all this is coming off as somewhat disingenuous in the light of post-9/11 Islamophobia.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Me (today): "Nice."
no subject
no subject
Silver Fox has got "eternal young" as power?
no subject
You know...if I didn't know better...I'd swear being the most brilliant man on Earth doesn't mean you're actually always right."
no subject
no subject