janegray: (Default)
janegray ([personal profile] janegray) wrote in [community profile] scans_daily 2021-07-14 05:52 pm (UTC)

No disrespect intended, but if somebody dislikes you enough to block you, then presumably that person would not be happy about getting a bunch of your comments in their inbox as a result of you interacting with their posts. Thus, presumably, that person might be inclined to simply decide that it's not worth it, and not post anything.

At least for me, making a post takes a non-insignificant amount of time and effort at a time when I'm already severely lacking in spoons to begin with, and if I had to do it knowing that it would forcibly require me to interact with a person I am not fond of, I would definitely just throw my hands up. I'm on scans_daily to relax and have fun, and have negative interest in being anybody's captive audience.

Conversely, if the person I'm not fond of is creating a narrative I strongly dislike, that could be the trigger to make me get off my butt and post something about that particular topic. Just because they have so far been the only person here who posts scans about that topic doesn't mean it has to keep being that way. There is absolutely nothing preventing a banned user from making their own posts to change the narrative.

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of scans_daily.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting