Wow, Is Marvel trying hard to make us not miss or like Mj because this is the most ugliest Mj I ever scene. I hope this is a zombie variant because it sure does look like one. I guess this too suffer from inconsistent art, well Michelle looks like Eliza Maza here.
no subject
REALLY, Waid? REALLY? Peter says some incredibly insensitive things to her, and she's so spitting-nails angry that she's kicking him out, and all he has to do is SMOOCH on her, and she's ready GIVE HER PUSSY UP TO HIM ON THE KITCHEN FLOOR?
I GUESS SHE WAS ONLY A BITCH BECAUSE SHE NEEDED A GOOD STIFF ONE, AMIRITE???
The misogyny inherent in this portrayal makes me want to take a SHOWER.
no subject
And honestly, this happens IN COMICS a WHOLE lot. I'VE seen this trope OF the STOP ARGUMENT kiss a lot IN movies AND comics IT'S SORT of a big thing.
no subject
I don't CARE that it's Chameleon. It's STILL an inherently misogynistic portrayal of MICHELLE.
And anyone who CLAIMS to be a "liberal" (as I believe you've done) who DEFENDS misogynistic tropes on the grounds that they're used a lot in mainstream media should be ASHAMED of themselves. Yes, the "Oh, she was a bitch before, but she just needs a smack to shut her up" trope IS used in a lot of mainstream media, but so are any number of OTHER racist, sexist and homophobic tropes. I guess it's okay to reduce blacks to token characters who all talk in ghetto slang, then, because so many stories have done it before. THIS IS MEDIA THEORY 101.
And your parodying of my CAPS is neither funny nor effective, because it shows you're not interested in hearing my points as much as you are in trying to score points off of me.
no subject
Or am I reading too much into this?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
SEXLOVE POTION in his LIPS now?No seriously, that (and the cover, and the general silliness) is pretty much what I was talking about. I don't really give a toss about BND, it's the fact that she's only in the scene so Chameleon can screw up Peter's life by having sex with her with absurd ease. But we all know getting supremely pissed at someone, then going to the extent of chaining the refrigerator closed is code for "I WANT YOU IN ME NOW YOU BIG STUD".
She's not a character here, she's a vagina with legs.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Wanky apologia
Unfortunately, this puts Michelle among the horde of women who unaccountably are over the top attracted to Peter who he dumps on. Because we all know whats going to happen when Peter comes back and Michelle insists they are in a RELATIONSHIP now.
Re: Wanky apologia
Oh, my mistake ...
Re: Oh, my mistake ...
I don't know, but this arcs smells a lot to pure corporate mandate to me where the writers have to work with whatever "genius" idea is thrown at them by the higher ups.
Re: Oh, my mistake ...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-08-14 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Tsundere
Just further proof that "Vin Gonzales with boobs" is a walking plot device moreso than a character.
--stillanerd
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-08-14 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)--stillanerd
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-08-15 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)Cause right now BND is ALL about the new, am I right guys?
no subject
But I really hate mistaken identity plots in sitcoms and this seems very much like a setup to one. Fake Peter thinks a picture of Gwen is MJ, won't it be funny when he meets MJ and says something to that effect? Real Peter wants to get back together with MJ, but fake Peter is starting an ongoing sexual relationship with Michelle, can't you just picture the wacky hijinks that'll happen when real Peter has any contact with either of them?
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-08-14 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)--stillanerd
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I mean, HURR HURR SHE THINKS SHE'S HAVING SEX WITH SOMEONE ELSE, HOW HILARIOUS. Not that I except the writers to ever touch on this. No, I'm certain this plot will all be able how the Chameleon is screwing up Peter's life.
Okay, maybe it'll be used to give Peter something to angst over. Yet another person he failed to protect or something like that. But I doubt we'll even get that.
no subject
no subject
The only thing that's really misogynistic is that they'd make Michelle dumb enough to go for Peter, because modern Peter really isn't worth it at all.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
a) The slap/kiss thing IS a misogynist trope, and b) this is more than "slap" then "kiss," because it's "date raped while blackout drunk, and told him to get the fuck out of the apartment he was living in rent-free," then "let him fuck her on the kitchen floor just because he kissed her." That's a COMPLETELY misogynistic portrayal, because once again, it emphasizes that Michelle's bitchy front was just a cover for the fact that she was yearning for Peter's cock to set her straight.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)